But have you met the big time boosters at these schools? Do they seem to lack political clout? How do you think they will react to losing their deductions or seeing a lesser product. Can you really invigorate the massas by attacking a national pastime?
How will Iowa fans and Grassley constituents take this?
Georgia is the only school that has that kind of department profit. Most schools budget up to their expected income and make maybe several million in profit.
Oops, I mean the ones that make a profit since most schools LOSE money.
If ‘Bama is any indication, tax deductibility is overblown as a concern to boosters. The people in Tuscaloosa certainly don’t give a rat’s ass about anything right now but winning, whatever it costs.
What I don’t underestimate, though, is (1) jealousy from academic types over what coaches are paid; (2) resentment over the power the coaches have in negotiating their deals with college administrators; and (3) the desire on the part of the NCAA to gain more control over college football, the biggest cash generator in college athletics.
Do I see revoking the tax exemption as a sexy political issue? No way. Do I see it as a potential wedge issue between certain factions in college sports that may be used politically as a lever to restructure college football? Let’s just say I’m not so sure about that one…
“A lot coaches during the recruiting process will do things just to attract you. They will make you think that they’re this type of person just to get you to go to that school. And then you get there, and sometimes it’s completely different, the person is completely different. And with Coach Richt, you could see him doing that during the recruiting process and it’s like ‘Man, I hope he stays that way if I sign there.’ And once I committed, same way. Once I signed, same way...” -- Shaun McGee, AJ-C, 5/22/13
But have you met the big time boosters at these schools? Do they seem to lack political clout? How do you think they will react to losing their deductions or seeing a lesser product. Can you really invigorate the massas by attacking a national pastime?
How will Iowa fans and Grassley constituents take this?
Georgia is the only school that has that kind of department profit. Most schools budget up to their expected income and make maybe several million in profit.
Oops, I mean the ones that make a profit since most schools LOSE money.
KG, a couple of points in response:
If ‘Bama is any indication, tax deductibility is overblown as a concern to boosters. The people in Tuscaloosa certainly don’t give a rat’s ass about anything right now but winning, whatever it costs.
What I don’t underestimate, though, is (1) jealousy from academic types over what coaches are paid; (2) resentment over the power the coaches have in negotiating their deals with college administrators; and (3) the desire on the part of the NCAA to gain more control over college football, the biggest cash generator in college athletics.
Do I see revoking the tax exemption as a sexy political issue? No way. Do I see it as a potential wedge issue between certain factions in college sports that may be used politically as a lever to restructure college football? Let’s just say I’m not so sure about that one…