I had a hard time believing Tebow would leave any competitive game for Brantley “to run a few plays” whatever that’s supposed to mean. Barring injusry or a game that has already been decided, can anyone honestly imagine just bringing Brantley in for the hell of it?
I do think they should play him as much as possible in games that are decided, though, both for his development and for Tebow’s sake.
“I hope they would have the same commitment every year,” Richt said. “But they are human and they’re going to be hearing about it and thinking about it all year and they know that we can’t wait ‘til midseason to be in midseason form. We’ve got to be there Game One. So that means you’ve got to be prepared.” -- AJ-C, 5/7/13
I am SHOCKED!!! Shocked, Shocked, Shocked that CUM would say one thing and do another.
There are no words to described how shocked I am…except for one: SHOCKED!!!
(to RedCrake): “Your winnings, Sir.”
RedCrake: “Oh, thank you very much! Everybody out at once!”
Me thinks Tebow would have made one heck of a LB. Richard Samuel as well. Come to think of it both those guys would have made great fullbacks too.
It’s always a pleasure to know which of our players are not living up to our expectations.
After all, that’s what it is all about, right, living up to our expectations?
or safety…………..
I had a hard time believing Tebow would leave any competitive game for Brantley “to run a few plays” whatever that’s supposed to mean. Barring injusry or a game that has already been decided, can anyone honestly imagine just bringing Brantley in for the hell of it?
I do think they should play him as much as possible in games that are decided, though, both for his development and for Tebow’s sake.