Daily Archives: June 12, 2011

Exorcising Adelson’s ghost

Georgia will be ranked higher than #64 in this year’s Orlando Sentinel preseason rankings.

About these ads

5 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Media Punditry/Foibles

Big.

So how big is Big John Jenkins?  This big:

I don't suppose I have to tell you that's Jenkins on the left.

Marc Weiszer gives us some perspective.

… In this picture, Jenkins is sitting next to running back Johnrone Bunch, who is listed at 6-2 and 194 pounds on the Mount Ida College web site…

And remember, Jenkins is a guy who has running back experience on his resume.

23 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

Always read the fine print, part two.

I noted back in February that the Connecticut legislature was considering a bill called the “Connecticut Student-Athletes’ Right to Know Act”.  The bill required schools to be more forthcoming with recruits about the ins and outs of athletic scholarships.

Well, Connecticut House Bill 5415 has in fact passed.  Its passage is being hailed as a “major breakthrough for players’ rights”.  The bill requires Connecticut schools to post a hyperlink on the front page of their official athletic web sites which takes a reader to a list of policies the schools follow.  Oh, yeah, if recruits are given written materials by recruiters, those materials must contain a reference to the web site and link.

That’s nice.  And it’s better than nothing at all.  But it’s not the greatest thing since sliced bread, either.

That’s because it was watered down from a proposal that really did have some teeth to it.

… The original bill was entitled “An Act Requiring the Informed Consent of Prospective Athletes Being Recruited to Institutions of Higher Education.”  The present bill has been renamed ”An Act Requiring Full Disclosure to Prospective Athletes Being Recruited to Institutions of Higher Education.”  The substitution of ”full disclosure” for  ”informed consent” may appear semantic, but is significant.  Full disclosure is a much lower standard than the elevated duty of informed consent.

Moreover, the present bill merely requires that colleges and universities “provide a hyperlink entitled ‘Student Athletes’ Right to Know’ on the front page of its official athletic Internet web site with various details concerning the “fine print” contained in the athletic scholarship.  Coaches who recruit student-athletes will not be responsible for disclosure and informed consent as described in the original bill.  Clearly, a hyperlink on already busy athletic department website does not compare to the compliance required by a coach obtaining informed consent from a student-athlete.

Gee, I wonder how that happened.

Again, this isn’t to say the new law isn’t without its good points.  Putting the information out there in a coordinated fashion can’t hurt.  But as the author of the above notes, “… this information is only useful if the student-athlete clicks on the hyperlink, reviews the information and has a conversation with the coaches recruiting the student-athlete.”  Now there’s a conversation every head coach looks forward to having with a prospective student-athlete and his parents.

So, no, the next major step isn’t to provide more of the same with regard to information about academics, as the post at Oversigning.com suggests.  It’s to eliminate the virtual middleman the legislature created when it changed the direction of the bill.  Make coaches have that talk and make them do it in a substantive way so that informed consent means just that.  Then we’ll have something worth bragging about.

18 Comments

Filed under Political Wankery, Recruiting

Always read the fine print, part one.

One of the moves made at Destin hailed as a major development by the parties involved is the banning of coaches from 7-on-7 tournaments.

… By now, you’ve probably read or heard about the ills of 7-on-7 tournaments, claims of unseemly third-party characters shopping recruits while simultaneously driving a wedge between player and coach in the recruiting process. Such uneasiness about the dubious characterization of 7-on-7 events led to the Southeastern Conference proposing and passing legislation at its annual meeting in Destin, Fla., earlier this month. The new regulation will keep non-scholastic 7-on-7 tournaments off member institution campuses and also bar SEC coaches from participating in off-campus tournaments and events.

The legislation had the backing of SEC coaches.

There is, however, a big difference between “non-scholastic” and “all”.

… But in a black-and-white world filled with grays, all 7-on-7 events aren’t equal.

Georgia football coach Mark Richt, who also was in favor of the 7-on-7 legislation, recently concluded a tournament at the Mark Richt Camp. Alabama is set to host the Nick Saban 7-on-7 Classic beginning this Friday.

How is this allowed?

The SEC legislation only applies to non-scholastic 7-on-7 teams/tournaments, meaning tournaments composed solely of high school teams are free of restrictions. Which is why 48 teams from across the state and country will descend upon Tuscaloosa for Saban’s tournament this Friday and Saturday.

As much as they’d like to say differently, this isn’t about helping recruits nearly as much as it is about helping high school coaches.  Which helps SEC coaches.

4 Comments

Filed under Recruiting, SEC Football

There ain’t enough room in the state for both of ‘em.

Shorter Kevin Scarbinsky:  if Jay Jacobs were a neutral observer like I am, he’d kiss Nick Saban’s arse, too.

7 Comments

Filed under Gene Chizik Is The Chiznit, Media Punditry/Foibles, Nick Saban Rules

Talk isn’t always cheap.

The funny thing about this story is that if Wisconsin had played NC State last season, Toon could have praised Russell Wilson’s ability to the skies with the media and nobody would have cared.

4 Comments

Filed under Recruiting, The NCAA