Watching the river flow

At Northwestern, they’re frantically trying to convince the players to put the unionization genie back in the bottle.  The student-athletes and their families have questions, and, hey, the school has answers.  Commence freaking out over a threat nobody’s voiced:

The “Background” section covers the school’s protocol if players strike: “Northwestern could potentially bring in replacement players, perhaps even asking the walk-on football players to cross the picket line,” and the tension from such a situation would be “unprecedented and not in everyone’s best interest,” the school states.

Boy, I’ll say.

Wonder why nobody asked the question how come schools and the NCAA didn’t take student-athlete complaints and concerns seriously until the lawsuits and the NLRB ruling started piling up.  Because it sure seems like those threats are getting somebody’s attention.  I mean, this is one helluvan analogy South Carolina’s president makes (h/t The Crystal Ball Run).

Shoring up the levee prior to Hurricane Katrina could have prevented the massive flooding that devastated New Orleans.

Determined not to make mistakes similar to those made in Louisiana, the NCAA more than three years ago began down a path toward transformation. Now, even amid rising waters, we are nearing the end of extensive work to shore up our governance structure, and soon we will provide better support for student-athletes.

On Friday, the Northwestern University football team will vote on unionizing. Regardless of the outcome of this vote and its potential ramifications, the NCAA must act now.

Admittedly, the wheels of progress have turned too slowly.

So the NCAA is voting on its new governance structure the day before the Northwestern unionization vote.  That’s some fortuitous timing there, Brother Pastides.

If the NCAA vote passes and the Northwestern vote fails, my guess is that after you hear its enormous sigh of relief, the NCAA will blather about saving the game and will return to resting on its laurels.  The short-term problem with that, of course, is that the antitrust suits are still out there and aren’t going away.

The long-term problem is that the foundational tension between amateurism and the enormous sums of money flowing into college sports isn’t going away, either.

The change has happened in part because of changing attitudes about amateurism and in part because of ­continued missteps by the NCAA. But it has mostly been about the money. And for all the money flying around college basketball, it’s college football that is raking in the craziest amounts: ESPN is paying reportedly $5.64 ­billion over 12 years for the upcoming College Football Playoff—six games each season. It is one thing to say that a $50,000 scholarship package is sufficient compensation for players when teams play 11 games a year on local television; it is quite another when the TV contracts are exceeding those of professional sports. The money has turned an abstract argument into a moral one.

The problem is that every fix seems to fundamentally alter things: You just can’t mend college sports without breaking them. At least, we haven’t figured out a way yet, as the recent challenges to the status quo show.

The biggest problem is that the NCAA hasn’t even tried to figure out a way yet.  Admittedly, I’m not sure if it’s capable of finding a solution – although I’m pretty confident current leadership can’t – but waiting for the court cases to go badly before making the attempt strikes me as a profoundly stupid way of managing the situation.

And all we can do is watch.

About these ads

8 Comments

Filed under It's Just Bidness, Look For The Union Label, The NCAA

8 responses to “Watching the river flow

  1. Bulldog Joe

    Good to see Georgia’s out in front on this one. Maybe this explains why we loaded up our lineup with walkons the past four years. ;-)

  2. As I’ve said before, I’m not a fan of unions in general, I think in the long run they harm more than they help. But the student-athletes had to find a way to have a voice. In my mind the best case scenario though is that all this unionization talk scares the NCAA and schools into granting most of the reforms requested, then the unionization effort fizzles away. If they can get those reforms without the drawbacks of having to be in a union, that’s great for the student athletes.

    Of course, as Bluto has pointed out, depending on what happens with the court cases, a players union may eventually become a necessity, if the schools have to start implementing pay scales, royalties, etc. Having to do that on a school-by-school basis, rather than collectively, would be rough.

  3. Hogbody Spradlin

    The NCAA mistakes being oblivious with being impervious.

  4. The other Doug

    I wonder if NW will face any financial payments if their team strikes and they fail to provide one. The Big10 Network must be fed.

  5. Always Someone Else's Fault

    Just blow it up already.

  6. Dog in Fla

    Sometimes Harris Pastides is a college president, sometimes he’s the water

    USC President Harris Pastides on the UK court storm: “Once I realized I was paying [the fine] anyway, I ran down … I enjoyed every dollar.”

    http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/03/south-carolina-president-harris-pastides-joins-in-on-court-storming-fun/

  7. James

    It’s been a pretty good time watching every single NCAA talking point, when eventually tested by reality, turn out to be an absolutely inversed from reality.

    The NCAA exists for the betterment of the student-athlete…of course only when threatened.