Testy, testy

The O’Bannon plaintiffs are ready to go to trial.  The NCAA, understandably, is in no such hurry.  And it’s gotten some support from an unlikely source

On Friday night, lawyers for Keller — a former Nebraska and Arizona State quarterback — filed a motion that said that if the claims are not separated at trial, they want to delay the trial. The NCAA has previously sought that as well. The Keller plaintiffs are attempting to protect their claims against the NCAA from overlapping litigation.

The Keller plaintiffs said they can be ready for trial in six months once U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken lifts a stay that has prevented discovery from being accumulated. If Wilken decides the antitrust case won’t impact the right-of-publicity trial, the Keller plaintiffs said they have no position on the NCAA’s request to delay the trial.

The videogame-related claims are “not ripe for trial” because discovery is not completed, the Keller plaintiffs wrote. They said the O’Bannon plaintiffs cannot “adequately represent” the interests of the Keller plaintiffs because the two classes have “divergent interests.”

… and from more likely sources.

Also Friday, eight media companies — CBS, Fox, Turner, ABC, NBC Universal, A&E, NPR and Discovery — filed a brief supporting the NCAA in its attempt to appeal a First Amendment issue for the trial. The companies, along with the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, are jointly trying to file the brief to persuade Wilken to let the NCAA appeal a First Amendment issue to the 9th U.S. Circuit Appeals.

Wilken ruled on April 11 that the First Amendment does not guarantee media organizations unlimited rights to broadcast entire college football and basketball games — a defense used by the NCAA. She concluded that the question of whether athletes hold any ownership rights in their athletic performances depends on whether the athletes validly transferred their rights of publicity to another party, such as a school, conference or broadcaster.

All of this sounds like it’s going to Donald Remy’s head.  He’s getting a little more feisty.

In a statement released Saturday, NCAA chief legal officer Donald Remy said, “All interested parties other than Mr. Hausfeld and his O’Bannon clients agree: the antitrust case scheduled for trial on June 9 should not go forward with videogame-related claims that are now at risk of being tried two or three times. The unanimity of opinion, including not just defendants but also all non-O’Bannon plaintiffs, demonstrates that granting the motion to sever would avoid prejudice and massive, unnecessary duplication of effort. Mr. Hausfeld and his clients are alone in their opposition to the motion, and their amped up rhetoric should be dismissed for what it is: a smokescreen to distract from the merits and promote their PR agenda.”

Speaking of amped up rhetoric, maybe Remy would like to turn his attention to Jim Brown.  He’s inviting it:  “I wanted to say it as harsh as I could, because I want them to come at me in any way they want to…”  Then again, if there’s a 77-year old man I wouldn’t want to mess with, it’s Jim Brown.

About these ads

8 Comments

Filed under The NCAA

8 responses to “Testy, testy

  1. Don Leebern

    “…if there’s a 77 year old man I wouldn’t want to mess with…” Huh? Did somebody just kick me?

  2. AthensHomerDawg

    I’d really like to be a part ofgroup where I can get comments from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. You could do that here. Some very savvy people contribute to the discussions here. Bluto keeps the menu pretty varied though. Go back to his earlier posts and look to see who he referenced and build you a log and then visit those sites and see what they have available. Good luck.

    • Sorry, had to pull the comment you responded to… it’s spam.

    • Shipping Department

      Subject: Urgent Supply of Electric Scooters

      From: Electric Scooters Chartered, 23 Rue de Kilmax, Capital City, Togo

      Dear AHD, Your good name was referred to assist us in taking delivery of a surplus supply of electric scooters and that we urgently need to export. Your name comes to us with the highest reference for trustworthiness and you are the only person we are contacting to help in taking delivery of $1,000,000 US worth of low-mileage reconditioned scooters that will be delivered FOB to you in Savannah. The terms of your kickback will of course be greater than anything that your wildest dreams can imagine. Please provide us with your brokerage accounts information so that we may clean them out to legitimize the purchase order. Upon departure via freighter the entire amount will be refunded to your accounts in addition to a generous finder’s fee which you will be able use to purchase anything that you have ever desired. Good luck.

      Warmest Personal Regards,
      Director of Exports

      • AthensHomerDawg

        DIF …
        Y you wanna do me that way? ;-)

        • Dog in Fla

          Unable to resist but only because I knew that the engineering programs at the f/k/a Florida Metropolitan University vocational and trade school were nowhere nearly as good as Tech’s.

  3. Reipar

    I actually agree about the interlocutory appeal, but do not know enough on the video game claims. No sense in having a trial over an issue that should not go to a jury. This case will still go forward and has enough issues for any jury already without improper ones.