Category Archives: ACC Football

“I didn’t come to Maryland to cut sports.”

Sure.  It just worked out that way.

More than six months after Maryland revealed plans to eliminate eight athletic programsas a way to overcome a multimillion-dollar deficit, Athletic Director Kevin Anderson officially announced Monday that seven of those teams were unable to raise the necessary money for survival.

Men’s and women’s swimming; men’s tennis; women’s water polo; acrobatics and tumbling (formerly known as competitive cheer); and two men’s track programs, cross-country and indoor track and field, were eliminated. Those programs did not show enough progress toward raising eight years’ worth of total costs by June 30.

Anderson still maintains Maryland’s woes are part of a bigger picture of what’s plaguing D-1 athletics – “Anderson called football and men’s basketball ticket sales “very important” to the department’s revenue strategy, but he was quick to point out Maryland isn’t alone on this issue.” – but somebody needs to take a look in the mirror.

Maryland athletics faces such a dire financial situation largely because of declining revenue from its football and men’s basketball programs. After undertaking a $50.8 million expansion of Byrd Stadium in 2006, and accruing approximately $35 million in debt as a result, Maryland saw attendance at football games fall every year until this past season.

Meanwhile, Maryland men’s basketball watched its attendance drop by more than 1,700 fans per game this past season, the steepest decline among ACC schools.

Think the $2 million buyout paid to Friedgen and the $3 million just spent on a new football field wouldn’t come in handy right now?

About these ads

6 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, It's Just Bidness

Wednesday morning buffet

I think I smell fresh seafood from Destin.

8 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, BCS/Playoffs, Big 12 Football, SEC Football, Strategery And Mechanics

I just want you to be happy, honey.

Tony Barnhart has some really bizarre advice for the ACC in this piece about five steps the conference can take to save itself:

… The ultimate trump card you can play with Florida State is your knowledge that they really don’t want to be in the Big 12. They want to be in the SEC. The SEC is in the process of putting together its own network and somewhere down the road may want to expand to 16 teams. Florida State missed on a chance to join the SEC in 1990. They don’t want to miss out again. Use that chip to buy yourself some time.

I had to read that three times to make sure I missing something there, but, yes, he is suggesting that the ACC should tell FSU to wait until its gets the partner it really wants before up and leaving.

“We’re not at the height of our game right now,” an ACC athletics director told me.

This would certainly cement that.

12 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, Media Punditry/Foibles

Game changer

Be still my heart.  The ACC is apparently pursuing something I mocked the other day, according to Tech AD Dan Radakovich.

Regarding a possible bowl alliance for the ACC champion, Radakovich said that will be a topic of discussion for a conference call of league athletic directors this week. He said that league associate commissioner Michael Kelly has been working on “trying to set something up similar to what you had seen announced last Friday with the Southeastern Conference and the Big 12.”

“Similar” is an amorphous term.  Unless you think matching up against Boise State in the Orange Bowl every year is something that will change D-1 football as we know it.

One thing to keep in mind as these lock-ins proliferate – if the postseason does go to a plus-one format, the more bowls that match up teams based purely on conference affiliation and not rankings, the harder it’s going to be to achieve a consensus on the top two teams after the bowl games are played.  Now there’s a formula for stability.

5 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, BCS/Playoffs

SEC! SEC! SEC!

From Jon Solomon’s victory lap over the SEC’s emasculation of the ACC:

The ACC can’t even cheat better than the SEC. North Carolina got a bowl ban, Georgia Tech vacated its 2009 ACC title, Bowden lost too many wins to keep pace with Joe Paterno, and the jury’s out on what happens to Miami.

The SEC? South Carolina salvaged its 2010 SEC East title and its future despite NCAA violations, and Alabama and LSU staged the first BCS Championship Game between two teams on NCAA probation.

I bet Mike Slive kvells like a proud papa about that.

2 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, SEC Football

Mark Bradley knows how to fix the ACC.

I admit it’s possible that he’s deliberately being stupid as a trolling device, but assuming that he’s sincere, man, Bradley’s post about how all is not yet lost for the ACC is one incredibly moronic undertaking.

Start with this:

The ACC needs to tie itself to a big new bowl. This part is true. Indeed, this is essential. The chance of the champions from the SEC and the Big 12 being omitted from the presumptive four-team BCS playoff is small; the chance of  an ACC titlist not making the final cut is rather larger. (No ACC team has played for the BCS title since Florida State in 2000, which was so long ago that Mark Richt was the Seminoles’ offensive coordinator.)

To be considered viable, the ACC cannot have its champ landing in, say, the Champs Sports Bowl. Nobody knows how the postseason matrix will look two years down the road — will existing bowls become part of the BCS tournament? — but the ACC can’t wait. It must find itself a worthy partner. That partner need not be the Big East, the least of the Big Six football leagues. Better for the ACC to forge an alliance with the runner-up from the Big Ten or the Pac-12 or even the SEC than to be doomed to a decade of playing Cincinnati.

Nothing says conference validation like agreeing to have your best team face off against somebody else’s runner-up.

Moving on, Bradley’s advice for FSU is to stay put.  Its president knows best, y’all:  “Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska and Texas A&M left the Big 12 at least in part because the Big 12 is not an equal share conference. Texas has considerably more resource avenues and gains a larger share (and I say this as a former dean of the University of Texas at Austin).”  Except Barron’s wrong about that – the Big 12 is an equal revenue share conference.  One that’s generating more TV revenue per school than FSU’s current home.  Oh.

Finally, even though everyone knows the conferences are ruled by football TV money, Bradley thinks the ACC should seek its salvation by doubling down on its last expansion move.

Swofford should go hard at Kansas and Louisville, schools that graced the 2012 Final Four and that play creditable football. That would stretch the ACC map deeper into the Midwest — and into the Kansas City and Louisville television markets — and would make this the basketball league to end all basketball leagues.

That “Kansas plays credible football” is the part that makes me wonder if Bradley’s just trolling here for sport.  But aside from that, all you’d end up doing by following this advice is to make the ACC into the Big East, redux.  (You know, the conference that Bradley is telling Swofford to avoid like the plague.)  If basketball was the glue that Bradley believes it to be, Pitt and Syracuse wouldn’t have left their old conference in the first place.  And while I’m at it, here’s one more question:   how do you reconcile the ACC’s better academics – remember, that’s a reason for FSU to stay – with Louisville’s admission?

I think Bradley needs to stick to his Paul Johnson is a genius in all ways material.  Even that’s less stupid than this piece.

**************************************************************************************

UPDATE:  By the way, Mark, this is how bad things have gotten for the ACC.

… Del Conte said that the once dead Big 12 “now has schools like Florida State, Clemson and Miami trying to get in.”

Yep.  The AD at TCU, which was a proud member of the Big East about fifteen minutes ago and before that was holding court in the mighty Mountain West, is now looking down at some of the ACC’s crown jewels.

18 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, Media Punditry/Foibles

Man the lifeboats, boys! It’s every mediocre program for itself!

While I think the “interest because of strong academics” part of this story is complete bullshit, I’m not surprised in the least to hear that Georgia Tech is rumored to be putting feelers out.

16 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, Georgia Tech Football, It's Just Bidness

The ACC has a football problem.

There are a couple of eye-opening quotes from Clemson’s AD in this Q&A piece worth noting.  First, if you want to understand why the ACC seems to be teetering on some sort of precipice these days, here’s why:

… The conference and the membership well understand what is happening. For example, in this latest contract with ESPN, 80% of it is generated by football. As good as basketball has been in the ACC, it is very evident just through this contract that football has to be very, very relevant.

Raiding the Big East for Pitt and Syracuse may look great from a basketball perspective, but it doesn’t do a damned thing for football.  Too bad that’s where the money is.  And the ACC has had a hard time understanding that lately, which is kind of surprising, given that the moves that brought FSU, Miami and Virginia Tech into the conference were all driven by football.

But here’s the sobering part of the conversation:

… For example this new contract has two look-in windows- one at five years and one at 10 years. The purpose of that – in talking with ESPN people and our people in the same room – is to look at the end of five years where are we- competitively, what’s our performance, and does it merit a significant increase in the rights fee. There’s no question that on ESPN, the rights to television money is larger than any other conference. They’ve got other- the SEC has CBS and other conferences have other carriers, but there is tremendous exposure for the ACC football games as well as basketball games and other Olympic sports. As far as exposure, it’s a very good contract. Dollar wise as far as what ESPN is paying, it’s at the top, but overall because of the lack of CBS, you don’t have the same kind of dollars that other conferences have. But, having said that, ESPN has made it very clear that the purpose of writing in those look-ins is to see where we are in five years. You don’t wait until the end of the 15 years to say, ‘hey, how are we doing?’ That’s the purpose of the five-year and the ten-year look-in to challenge our conference and all of us associated with the conference know that football is extremely important and we have to perform and do everything we can to perform. [Emphasis added.]

The WWL insisted on writing look-in provisions into the new TV deal.  That’s not exactly a vote of confidence in your long-term prospects, ACC.

32 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, It's Just Bidness

Mike Slive, putting the screws to the ACC

Tony Barnhart tells the story:

The SEC will announce at Noon ET an agreement with the Big 12 for their champions to meet in a to-be-determined bowl game if they are not a part of the anticipated four-team playoff beginning in 2014.

An industry source said the alliance between the two conferences will be similar to that of the Big Ten and Pac-12, whose champions meet annually in the Rose Bowl if they are not a part of the BCS championship game.

“The thinking is, the Big 12 and SEC, we’re in the strongest positions right now. Let’s create a big-time matchup,” a source told CBSSports.com. “I don’t know if other leagues will create matchups like this, but this is a way for the two leagues to develop [a partnership].”

In one sense, this isn’t much:  the bowl game itself is almost meaningless.  There hasn’t been a national title game without a participant now a member of either conference since 2001.

But as a message, it’s profound.  The ACC just found itself locked out of the public perception of being one of the major players.  Now when it comes to football conferences, there’s a big four and there’s everybody else.  (Unless you think there’s a lot more cachet to a ACC-Big East partnership than I do.)  If you don’t think this is going to add more fuel to the FSU fire, you’re nuts.  I’ll leave you to speculate on what Slive hopes to gain here.  Let’s just say that if I were John Swofford’s dog, I’d be keeping a low profile today.

The SEC just chose a side.  The ACC lost.

******************************************************************************************

UPDATE:  By the way, if the next step the new partnership takes is to emulate the regular season scheduling matchup the Pac-12/Big Ten have agreed to, that will take some of the sting out of the SEC staying with an 8-game conference schedule.  Although I will laugh my ass off if the first pairings include South Carolina-Oklahoma and Iowa State-Georgia.

24 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, Big 12 Football, SEC Football

If there’s anyone who knows what the ACC is like, it’s Bobby Bowden.

FSU’s former coach speaks truth to power… er, mediocrity.

“My message would be stay in the ACC,” Bowden told Arute in a transcript provided by SiriusXM. “Do you want to win a National Championship at Florida State?  You’ve got a better chance in the ACC than you have in the Big 12, or even the SEC.

“You say, ‘Well, gosh, they’re much stronger in those conferences.’  Yeah!  They beat up on each other and you can’t hardly get there.  You know what?  Florida State, wait ‘til you get good enough to rule the ACC then you start looking for someplace to jump.  But my opinion?  They should stay right where they are.”

The man knows what he’s talking about.  After all, that’s the real reason FSU chose to join the ACC over the SEC in the first place.

32 Comments

Filed under ACC Football