Monthly Archives: November 2007

Boomer Buckeye

Jason and the guys at Eleven Warriors have shifted allegiances this week.

If I thought Pitt had even the proverbial snowball’s chance, I’d likely do something similar at GTP. Alas, there will be no sighting of Wannstedt’s mustache here.

Comments Off on Boomer Buckeye

Filed under BCS/Playoffs, The Blogosphere

Les Miles has the best team in the country… for 60 minutes.

AOL Fanhouse’s Charles Rich absolutely nails Les Miles’ idiotic comment about how good his team’s season has been.

The thing is, I’m not sure that’s the dumbest remark Miles made at his weekly presser. Here’s what he said about Darren McFadden and the Tiger defense:

The Arkansas game in certain personnel, they didn’t have a chance. When they got to the running back personnel and started using (Darren) McFadden like they did, I have to admit they had us. Even when we could get an extra guy to the play, we still couldn’t make the tackle. That is Arkansas. I think it is unrealistic to look at a defense and think that they will hold them to 250 yards…

“They had us”? It’s “unrealistic” to hold Arky to 250 rushing yards? Jeebus. It happened in a third of the games Arkansas played this year.

Auburn held McFadden to 43 yards and the Arky rushing attack to a total of 67 yards. Tennessee only allowed 151 yards on the ground by the Hogs. Arkansas was held under 250 yards rushing in two other contests this season.

But not by LSU, which, by the way, is ranked higher in rushing defense than any of the teams that held Arky under that magical yardage figure that White Cap conceded. I’m impressed.

Toss in the fact that he’s already doing a little anti-Georgia lobbying on the BCS title game (not that it’s going to matter), and Miles has made me a Tennessee fan this week. You know, that Phil Fulmer fella’s not a bad looking guy…

3 Comments

Filed under General Idiocy, SEC Football, The Blogosphere

Georgia Tech lies and cheats.

Like we didn’t know that already.

Here’s all it takes to get thrown out of a game for flagrant clipping:

What’s a little thing like a right knee between friendly rivals?

5 Comments

Filed under Georgia Tech Football

A. J. Green is coming for your footballs

Normally, I don’t like to dwell on Georgia’s verbals here, as I’m a “get ’em in the barn first” kind of person, but I have to admit to getting a little excited about the prospect of WR A. J. Green suiting up in the Red and Black.

Why?

(h/t Swains @ Online Athens Football Forum)

6 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Recruiting

Mark Richt still gets it.

Tucked in at the very end of the Bulldog Hotline show from last night comes this pearl of wisdom from Georgia’s head coach:

William in Augusta said CMR has made it easy to be a Georgia fan the last seven years. College football is the greatest sport but the only one where the championship is not decided on the field. Presidents need to decide whether their loyalties are to their schools and teams or to a stodgy old bowl system. CMR – you may not like the answer .. the regular season is more exciting than any other sport ..because there is no playoff system. [Emphasis added.] If you had a playoff system, some of these games wouldn’t be as meaningful since teams that lost knew they could make the playoff.

Well said.

Now, if we could just get him to see the light about keeping the WLOCP in Jacksonville…

***********************************************************************************

UPDATE: Dan Wetzel, on the other hand, is about as clueless as a man can be. The “Wetzel Plan” (cool name, hunh) manages to combine just about every bad playoff concept ever conceived into one overarchingly stupid concept. So I guess it does have the virtue of being economical.

It’s not just the appearance of all the usual dumb ideas – 16 team playoff with all conference champions qualifying (Central Michigan, come on down!); the elimination of all of the major bowl games; the automatic assumption of massive increases in revenue; Cinderella and brackets (aka December Madness) – that makes his “Plan” so moronic. It’s the relentless, cheery detachment from reality that elevates it into something truly special. Such as when he writes

… Does anyone without direct rooting interest really care if USC wins the Pac-10 Saturday? How about the Virginia Tech-Boston College ACC title game?

Since when did “direct rooting interest” become dirt under our shoes? Christ, that’s the essence of college football.

My favorite part – after Wetzel complains that the current system is “illogical”, he goes on to say

… For even lower-rated conferences – the Sun Belts, the MACs – allowing annual access to the tournament would not only set off celebrations on small campuses but it would encourage investment in the sport at all levels. Suddenly, there would be a reason for teams in those leagues to really care. This would improve quality throughout the country…

Dude. No. Look at your brackets. You’ve got a 7-5 Central Michigan team playing in a tournament that excludes schools like Tennessee and Texas. However you may want to characterize that, logic ain’t part of the equation. Or your article, for that matter.

16 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs

Raise your hands

Looking at the final SEC regular season stats, how many of you out there expected before the start of the year that Georgia would end up (1) leading the conference in sacks and (2) finishing fourth in the conference in sacks allowed?

2 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

Relax people. It’s a joke.

This strikes me as one of those articles you stick in the time capsule and come back and revisit in a month and a half or so.

Why would the viewing public necessarily be turned off by a game featuring the #6 scoring offense in the nation versus the #8 scoring offense?

And Ohio State and USC are better stories? Why, exactly?

6 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs, Media Punditry/Foibles

Eh, no.

Pete Fiutak at CFN kinda gets on my nerves this morning with a twofer.

First, there’s his open letter to Heisman voters about why Tebow should win the award over McFadden. Now, I disagree with that position, but I can certainly see an argument being made for it. Nor would I have a problem if Tebow won. He’s had a helluva year.

But then Fiutak writes this…

So how does McFadden have Tebow beat in the Heisman race this year? I’m looking for anyone to provide one cogent reason why and how No. 5 has been better than No. 15. A monster game against LSU isn’t enough.

Well, wait a minute. Why isn’t that LSU game a cogent reason? Where’s Tebow’s signature victory this year? Florida’s got almost as many losses as Arkansas and won’t be playing in a BCS bowl game, either, even though many would insist that the Gators are one of the elite teams in college football at this point in the season. So what have all of Tebow’s excellent statistics gotten his team this year that any number of other great (or even very good) QBs wouldn’t have accomplished?

If you extend this reasoning out to its logical conclusion, we’re going to risk reducing this whole thing down to a numbers game. There are a whole lot of kids at less than stellar programs who should have their names thrown in the mix each year if that’s where we want to follow Fiutak on this.

And just out of curiosity, why does Tebow’s GPA matter?

Moving on, Fiutak lays down the law. Georgia shouldn’t play in the BCS title game, because

… If you’re not going to have a playoff, then the regular season has to mean everything, and that means you cannot play for the national title if you can’t even win your own conference. Double that if you can’t even win your own division…

and in case you missed his point, he repeats it…

If you can’t even prove that you’re the best team in your own division, how can you even be considered among the two best teams in the country?

Well, first off, Georgia tied for the SEC East title. It didn’t lose the division; it lost the tiebreaker to play in the championship game. Ordinarily, that’s a distinction I could care less about, but if Fiutak’s gonna make an issue over it, he should at least be accurate about it.

But it’s Fiutak’s larger point that I have a problem with. To state that any team like Georgia that isn’t a conference champ should not be eligible to play for the MNC is fine – if that’s the rule going into the season. An ad hoc change on the fly as Fiutak suggests would be awfully unfair to schools that play in conferences that have championship games and, in some years, to schools not named Notre Dame.

You want to make certain that you devalue the meaning of the regular season? Tell every player on the Georgia team that the way he did his part to help his squad claw back in the national title picture isn’t going to make any difference now because of a rule you just implemented.

This isn’t a BCS vs. playoffs argument I’m making here. You could have this same issue with a four or eight team playoff format. It’s about being fair. As Mark Richt has said, there shouldn’t be a problem with Georgia being in the mix if that’s how the process has been arranged. If you don’t like it, fix it in the offseason, Pete.

9 Comments

Filed under College Football, Media Punditry/Foibles

The SEC at the finish line

The conference regular season is now over. The SECCG will feature Tennessee and LSU. I thought I’d take a look back over how the teams finished out and compare that with how they started and progressed/regressed over the year. You can find my previous looks here, here, here and here.

SEC WEST

  • LSU (6-2 SEC; 10-2 overall). The best team in the conference – again. The team with two inexplicable losses – again. You have to give Les Miles credit for consistency. And, as the Tigers’ last two games don’t mean much in the vast scheme of things, at least compared to a MNC, expect them to roll. Again.
  • Auburn (5-3 SEC; 8-4 overall). Not quite as good as I thought they’d be at the beginning of the season, the Tigers had some good moments (Florida), some bad moments (Georgia) and some inexplicable moments (Mississippi State). That loss to South Florida and near miss with Kansas State don’t look too hot, either. Bottom line: Auburn underachieved, just not as much as some other schools in the West did.
  • Arkansas (4-4 SEC; 8-4 overall). Lost amid all of the turmoil between Nutt and the fanbase was the fact that this team was close to having a very successful year. Only one of those conference losses wasn’t tight. Marcus Monk’s injury killed this team’s chances.
  • Mississippi State (4-4 SEC; 7-5 overall). Considering how little he had to work with on offense, Croom did one helluva job this year. This was not a team that you wanted to play close and leave in a game. Boring to watch? Sure. But I doubt many Bulldog fans will be complaining at their bowl game. You have to wonder what Croom could do with a team whose offense was merely competent.
  • Alabama (4-4 SEC; 6-6 overall). The most inexplicable season in the conference this year, bar none. Alabama was the only SEC team to lose two games out of conference. Saban gets a pass, of course, from the Tide fans and he’s got an excellent class coming in, so there’s no sense of panic in Tuscaloosa, but still. They better hope Saban’s right when he blames it all on inherited personnel.
  • Mississippi (0-8 SEC; 3-9 overall). They fired Cutcliffe, who can coach, because he couldn’t recruit. They fired Orgeron, who can recruit, because he couldn’t coach. God only knows who they get this go-round. Ole Miss wasn’t going to be very good this season, but nobody expected the Rebs to be quite that wretched, either. The midseason surge where they looked competent against some good teams (not that they got any wins from it) proved to be a mirage that made Orgeron’s performance look even worse. And that fourth quarter coaching job in the Egg Bowl… ugh.

SEC EAST

  • Georgia (6-2 SEC; 10-2 overall). Mark Richt told us what he thought he had with this group at the beginning of the season and he was ultimately proved right. Finding a way to get them to play focused was the big story for the Dawgs, but the other part of the picture this year was the time it took to figure out the right personnel to play on the offensive and defensive lines, wide receiver and linebacker. Oh yeah, there was that Moreno kid, too.
  • Tennessee (6-2 SEC; 9-3 overall). Well, we learned one thing: Phil Fulmer is a pretty good coach when he has a gun pointed at his head. For all their ups and downs, the Vols wound up where I thought they would record-wise, albeit by a pretty strange route (how many teams have wound up in the SECCG despite being outscored in the conference?). Ainge may have been overshadowed by a couple of other QBs in the division, but he had a fine year. UT wouldn’t be in the SECCG without him. Or the kickers at South Carolina, Vanderbilt and Kentucky.
  • Florida (5-3 SEC; 9-3 overall). Again, another team that finished about where I expected. Tebow proved to be a superb QB in Meyer’s system; the Gators’ extremely young defense proved to be Florida’s Achilles’ heel. The Gators are young and loaded and the battle between Florida and Georgia next year should be the big story in the SEC.
  • Kentucky (3-5 SEC; 7-5 overall). When the dust settled, 2007 wasn’t even as successful a year for the Wildcats as 2006 was. Maybe the LSU win took too much out of this team. Of course, not going +15 in turnover margin this season didn’t help.
  • South Carolina (3-5 SEC; 6-6 overall). Five straight losses to end the season. For once, beating Georgia was not a key to a successful year for the ‘Cocks. This team still has significant depth issues, especially on defense, that aren’t going away with one good recruiting class. You have to question if the task in Columbia is too big even for Spurrier.
  • Vanderbilt (2-6 SEC; 5-7 overall). Everyone keeps saying that Bobby Johnson is a good coach. Maybe yes, maybe no. I have a hard time saying yes for sure, when I look across the field at the guy who coached the Commodores’ last opponent. Grobe’s accomplished far more at Wake Forest than Johnson has dreamed of at Vandy. This was an OK season in Nashville, but they’re still not going to a bowl game. And this was a senior laden team, which doesn’t bode particularly well for next year.

Overall, I think you’d have to say the SEC looked much stronger in the middle of the year than where it finished. One big reason for that was the number of teams in the SEC East that returned a lot of players – Kentucky, South Carolina and Vanderbilt – and got off to good starts. As the season wore on the youth at Florida, Georgia and Tennessee got its footing and the traditional order was restored (the big three went 5-1 against the others, with the only loss being Georgia’s in the second week of the season).

All that being said, it was also one of the most entertaining seasons I can remember. LSU’s two losses were classics. Auburn’s win at Florida was a nailbiter. ‘Bama had two great games back to back with a last second win against Arky and a last play loss to Georgia. Tennessee and Kentucky played a four overtime game with everything on the line for the Vols. And you had to love Sylvester Croom’s reaction at the end of the Egg Bowl. Really, every team in the conference – except for Ole Miss – had at least one great moment during the season.

Encore, anyone?

5 Comments

Filed under SEC Football