In the wake of a one

Obviously, as with any race, it’s more important where you finish than where you start, but that preseason #1 ranking is still a thrill for any Georgia fan right now (even someone like me who isn’t a proponent of preseason polling in the first place).

The good news, historically speaking, as this AJ-C quiz shows, is that a #1 start leads to a fairly high finish at season’s end.  The not-so-good news, as Paul indicates, is that it’s a tough position to defend over the course of the year.

I hate to keep coming back to that schedule thang, but if you take a look at this post at Sunday Morning Quarterback, it’s hard to escape the reality that three of the top five contenders (Ohio State, Oklahoma and Southern Cal) have a clearly easier row to hoe from our current vantage point than do either of the SEC candidates.  Other than that (yeah, yeah…), the Dawgs are clearly valid competition for a slot in Miami.  But as SMQ concludes, it’s hard to escape the fact that the stakes in the OSU-USC game will be enormous.

*******************************************************************

UPDATE: The Jacksonville Times-Union’s Gene Frenette believes the #1 ranking is a cause for rejoicing if you’re Mark Richt.

4 Comments

Filed under College Football, Georgia Football

4 responses to “In the wake of a one

  1. Chuck

    That’s the one thing that is really broken with college football–inequitable schedules.

    Like

  2. Chuck,

    I agree. However, if you look down the road at future schedules the fascinating thing is that the better programs that have bigger stadiums are now under intense fan pressure to give their fans a little more on the non-conference schedule front.

    To that end, check out the future schedules of Southern Cal, Ohio State, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and Miami. Here:
    http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/future_schedules/

    The new model seems to be schedule 1 gorilla game a year and then hit your conference schedule. Even Ohio State is participating with upcoming games against Miami, Tennessee, Virginia Tech, and Oklahoma.

    It still doesn’t compensate for having a weak conference. Much of that is cyclical. But it’s a tiny step forward in a broader broken process.

    Shrink Div I to 90 or so teams and ban Div I-AA games. That’s the only real answer.

    Like

  3. Shrink Div I to 90 or so teams and ban Div I-AA games. That’s the only real answer.

    Agreed – except I’d go all the way down to eight ten team conferences.

    Like

  4. Will

    “But as SMQ concludes, it’s hard to escape the fact that the stakes in the OSU-USC game will be enormous.”

    True, but not as enormous as the WLOCP between our undefeated Dawgs and the undefeated Gators. SECCG and MNC on the line.😉

    Like