Let’s see… Tommy Tuberville sits three starters against Tennessee-Martin, defensive tackle Sen’Derrick Marks, defensive end Antonio Coleman and noseguard Tez Doolittle, presumably so they would be rested and better healed for the game this Saturday. So riddle me this: would Tuberville have done something like that in 2004, when his team was in the MNC hunt and had to protect its undefeated record?
My guess is no. Sure, he may have yanked those guys out of action as soon as there was a comfortable margin, but sit them from the get go? Doubtful. There was too much at stake to take that kind of chance, regardless of the opponent.
But in the context of a 2008 season that’s gone south, where there are two meaningful games left on the regular season slate, the calculus becomes quite different. Auburn has bigger fish to fry than Tennessee-Martin. Given that Auburn’s bowl opportunities don’t seem very attractive at present, Tuberville’s elected to treat the Georgia and Alabama meetings as – dare I say it? – a sort of in season playoff for Auburn.
Which leads to my real question here. Would it be unreasonable to expect coaches to engage in the same sort of calculations if we entered into an era of extended playoffs? Wouldn’t it be prudent in some cases for coaches to preserve their resources in the regular season so that they could maximize their contributions in the postseason? And if it is, is that the sort of balancing act we college football fans want to see?
Just asking…
*****************************************************************
UPDATE: Maybe this is the flip side of the coin.