So Iowa State hires Paul Rhoads, who was the defensive coordinator at Auburn, to replace Gene Chizik, who once was the defensive coordinator at Auburn and eventually wound up as the head coach at Iowa State until he was hired to be the head coach at Auburn replacing the guy who hired Chizik and Rhoads to be the defensive coordinator at Auburn (although not at the same time), to be its new head coach.
Is it better for Auburn or Iowa State if…
- Auburn has a better record next season than Iowa State, but wins less games in ’09 than it did this year?
- Iowa State has a worse record than Auburn next season, but wins more games in ’09 than it did this year?
- Iowa State has a better record than Auburn next season, but both teams go to bowl games?
- Auburn has a better record than Iowa State next season, but both teams play in the same bowl game?
- Iowa State has a better record than Auburn next season, but both teams play in the same bowl game?
- Auburn wins more games next season than Iowa State does, but Pat Dye says Gene Chizik isn’t man enough to beat ‘Bama?
- Iowa State has a winning record and Auburn has a losing record next season, but Iowa State loses to Iowa and Auburn beats Alabama?
- after next season, Chizik takes a job in the NFL and Rhoads is hired to replace him?
- Jimmy Sexton retires?
I probably should have thrown something in there about Muschamp, but I’m too tired to try.
Get The Picture 