What we should be talking about with SEC expansion

First of all, kudos to Bruce Feldman for taking the blogosphere seriously with his Q&A with Chris Brown.  (Chris kind of straddles the line, given that he writes for mainstream outlets, too, but still…)

Anyway, in response to a question about what he’s most looking forward to seeing in college football this season, Brown had this to say:

… it’s clear that the SEC has dominated college football for the last several years, and a lot of that has been due to their outstanding defenses. Alabama and LSU’s talent-laden squads last year were, of course, Exhibit A. Yet almost all of the rest of college football has been paced by offensive juggernauts like Oregon, Stanford, Oklahoma State, and so on. Obviously whether the SEC’s defense-led dominance can continue is really the most pertinent question in all of college football in terms of deciding who will be the next champion. But the complexion of the SEC itself has changed with the addition of Missouri and Texas A&M, two spread teams whose coaches have had lots of success on offense in the past, along with the up-tempo spread offense new coach Hugh Freeze is bringing to Ole Miss. All of those teams have weaknesses — A&M appears to be the most talented, but we don’t know if they have a quarterback — so I’d be shocked if any of them actually won the SEC over the favorites. But it will be fascinating to see what kind of success, if any, they have this fall. And it will be even more fascinating to decipher whether that success or failure portends any changes, one way or the other, for the rest of college football.

I think that’s exactly right.  It’s a variation of the old debate about how Boise State would fare if it played an SEC full season schedule.  Obviously, Missouri and TAMU played in a tougher conference than the Mountain West, but this clash of schemes should be fascinating to watch unfold.  I’m really looking forward to it.

3 Comments

Filed under SEC Football, Strategery And Mechanics

3 responses to “What we should be talking about with SEC expansion

  1. Cojones

    That will make at least two of us.

    Mizzou is fixed in my mind as a strong GT. Seth’s player assessments have culminated in Mitchell as our most important player, chiefly for the Mizzou game and their O. We will see the first test of SEC D in response. It’s shaping up as an ultra-interesting game.

    • Mg4life0331

      Agreed.
      However strong their roster may be, they play us early in the season which requires us to play at our best.

  2. Keese

    Wha…what? Conference expansion could be interesting to watch?