July 13, 2012 · 12:27 PM

Your daily dose of Dawg porn

I dunno about you, but this kind of talk gets me hot.

35 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

35 responses to “Your daily dose of Dawg porn”

  1. Tom
    July 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM

    I take those type of comments with a grain of salt. Need a better explanation. Twitter is not a reliable source of info.

    Like

  2. ScoutDawg
    July 13, 2012 at 12:58 PM

    No, not about logic. In college football Tom, it is about writing a check that you KNOW your ass can cash.

    Like

  3. RandallPinkFloyd
    July 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    Let’s say Richt steps down to go into the ministry in the next 3-4 years…Do you think McGarity tabs Grantham as the guy and sees this is his run in the minor leagues? Do you think Grantham sees/knows this is a possibility and sees the resources he would have available here if he patiently waits for this to happen? Or do I need to stop getting high on Grantham?

    Like

    • Gravidy
      July 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM

      With all due respect, RPF, I think you need to step away from the monitor and breathe some fresh air. The Dawg porn seems to be affecting you too much.
      😉

      Like

    • Russ
      July 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM

      That was my thought, too. Sounds like it’s spoken by someone who could be the next head coach.

      Though I think (and hope) Richt stays around another ten years.

      Like

      • adam
        July 13, 2012 at 4:48 PM

        Maybe this will be a case of Grantham leaving for a small HC job in a few years, doing great, Richt retiring a few years later, and Grantham being brought back “home” to Athens.

        Either way, the guy is probably everyone’s favourite UGA coach in the modern era.

        Like

    • Macallanlover
      July 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM

      Randall, as good as CTG has been at handling the defense he has shown very little of the skill set necessary to a HC. In fact, it isn’t even a program the size of UGA he couldn’t handle at this stage, I wouldn’t hire him at 1AA based on how he has reacted on the sidelines. Not saying he cannot work on weaknesses and improve but it would take several years of demonstrating change to convince me, and probably a stint at a lower level HC position.

      Just like there were many UGA fans who got enamored about BVG, Grantham gets everyone excited and they overlook the requirements for being the top guy. Based on enthusiasm alone, Trooper Taylor would be a candidate for these folks. Please note that I am not comparing CTG with TT as a coach or a person, just noting the differences between being on the staff and managing the staff, plus so much more. Assistant coaches are the conduit to the head guy and showing enthusiasm and empathy is part of the role. Let the Vandy’s and UT’s of the world learn about having immature jerks as their HC. I expect more from the HC of the program I am affiliated with. (And the SC loss was definitely NOT on him as already stated below),

      Like

  4. Newt
    July 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    And on suspensions: “We’ll be ready to play with the guys that strap it up and wear the ‘G’.”

    Like

  5. D.N. Nation
    July 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM

    Hey, speaking of Dawg porn, check out Aaron Murray’s new horrible back tattoo! http://i.imgur.com/u7eTS.jpg

    Like

  6. Bad M
    July 13, 2012 at 1:10 PM

    One of the radio guys here in SC commented on how unimpressed he was with Grantham. I’m sure he only saw us in the USC game so he’s an idiot. But going back and watch the D hold teams to negative rushing yards…that gets me more excited than all the previous flashy Off players we’ve had recently. That is football sexy.

    Like

    • Bevo
      July 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM

      I agree with you, but even if that was the only game he watched, it’s still a stupid observation.

      I’ll say this for the hundredth time: The defense did everything it needed to do to win the game against SC last year. Offense (with awful turnovers) and special teams (with the infamous Ingram speedwalking touchdown, etc) cost us the game. Anyone who looks at the scoreboard, sees a bunch of points scored against Georgia, and concludes that Grantham and the defense didn’t do their jobs in that game … is, um, not very keen.

      Like

      • Junkyard Dawg '00
        July 13, 2012 at 3:35 PM

        Just to play devil’s advocate, which is tough because I agree with most of your comment and really believe our Junkyard Dawg defense is gonna be great this year, but I was at the USCe game last year and I can’t get the visual out of my head of Lattimore running all over us. He was getting chunks of yardage and killing clock late in that game. Of course, I’d say that reflects less on our defense than it does how great that kid is. We owe all them ‘cocks an ass kicking this year!

        Like

        • W Cobb Dawg
          July 13, 2012 at 10:18 PM

          AM doesn’t fumble – with Ingram returning for TD, we win. AM doesn’t throw a pick 6, we win. Ingram doesn’t score on fake punt, we win. Being devil’s advocate doesn’t mean changing the facts. Lattimore’s yards meant little to nothing in that game. The D was the only part of our team that showed up to play – but gets blame (or partial blame) for loss?!

          Not much different than 2010, I’ll add. Everyone has memories of Lattimore running, but nobody says ship about an inept offense totally unprepared to play the game.

          Like

          • Bevo
            July 14, 2012 at 3:24 AM

            Exactly. Good post.

            Lattimore will get his yards against just about any defense. We contained him quite well. We scored a lot of points yet blew the game on offense.

            Like

  7. Mike not Gator Mike
    July 13, 2012 at 1:29 PM

    Not to be Debbie Downer, but I actually see this as a bit of a disappointment. Haven’t we all felt this to be the case for the last 5 years?

    Like

  8. cube
    July 13, 2012 at 1:34 PM

    In other words, Georgia has been significantly underachieving for a long, long time.

    Like

    • Bevo
      July 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM

      Ha. After I read the statement I thought the same.

      Grantham’s comment could be read as (1) “there’s so much potential just waiting to be unlocked!!” or (2) “the people running this place haven’t done sh*t with all the tools in this shed”.

      I’m not sure which it is…

      Like

    • Skeptic Dawg
      July 13, 2012 at 2:26 PM

      The hell you say!?!?!

      Like

  9. DawgPhan
    July 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM

    being able to unlock potential is easier said than done.

    Like

    • adam
      July 13, 2012 at 3:42 PM

      Grantham’s done a pretty good job on his end, IMO.

      Like

    • Junkyard Dawg '00
      July 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM

      Agreed DP. 18-21 year old kids, beautiful women to chase at the 100’s of athens bars, not earning a paycheck and limited in practice time while playing in the hardest conference in the country- how hard should it be? Should be a piece of cake to get all 85 (72 in our case!) of them all on the same page and winning titles every year.
      All kidding aside, I am fired up about this defense and I got all the faith in Grantham right now.

      Like

  10. Spence
    July 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM

    Todd Grantham got me pregnant. No, I am not a woman.

    Like

  11. Dawg19
    July 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM

    Forgive me, Senator but…THIS is Dawg porn…;-)

    Like

    • I wanna Red Cup
      July 14, 2012 at 12:09 AM

      Yes and the Senator will admit he was most valuable fan at this game. Kerwin Bell was named MVP for the game and I can still hear the Senator chanting “Kerwin Bell, MVP!”

      Like

  12. Hogbody Spradlin
    July 14, 2012 at 8:01 AM

    To repeat the essential question: Can we reach the mountaintop with an ethica,,l hard working decent man as coach, or do we require an asshole like Corch or Saban,,,

    Like

    • Skeptic Dawg
      July 14, 2012 at 2:07 PM

      Have Saban and Myer always been douches? Or did winning create who they are today? I don’t remember much of either one prior to LSU and Florida?

      Like