Daily Archives: November 16, 2013

Maybe the weirdest game I’ve been through.

First, I couldn’t figure out how Georgia was winning.

Then, I couldn’t out how Georgia lost.


Filed under Georgia Football

Off to see the eagle

Hard game to call today.  The Georgia team that beat South Carolina and LSU wins today.  The Georgia team that took in on the chin in Nashville would get a whipping.  Honestly, today’s team lies somewhere in the middle of those two extremes, but it’s not easy to say exactly where.

They’re getting bodies back, which is good.  Murray should have the most weapons he’s had to work with since the Tennessee game.  And I think there’s enough there to give Auburn’s defense fits.

But you still have to be concerned about where Georgia’s defense is, other than rushing the quarterback and defending the middle of the field in the run game.  I think we know what Malzahn will try to exploit.  The linebacking corps simply has to play its best game of the season today.  Can they?  I have no clue.

And let’s just think happy thoughts about special teams play, okay?  Also, Aaron Murray’s never thrown an interception against Auburn.  That would be a nice streak to keep intact today.

I’m about to head out the door for the Plains, where I’ve never seen the Dawgs lose.  Yes, I’m crossing my fingers that’s another streak that’s kept intact today.

Consider this your game day thread.



Filed under Georgia Football

About defending that Auburn running game…

Groo is spot on about the most important position on Georgia’s defense today.  The outside linebackers have to set and hold the edge.  (Harvey-Clemons, too.)  And they have to do it consistently.  Taking a play off here and there will kill them.  On the other hand, even the most angry critics of Grantham’s defense would have to admit Georgia’s chance of success in slowing Auburn’s offense rises if Georgia can force Auburn’s running game into the middle.

Keep an eye on Jenkins and Floyd.  I guarantee you Marshall will.


Filed under Georgia Football

Balancing act

Once upon a time, I thought I knew what people meant when they spoke of a balanced offense, at least sort of.  There’s the old Mike Bobo version of balance, where you start squirming when your run/pass ratio gets out of whack, and there’s the Mike Leach definition, where balance is about spreading the ball around to your playmakers as opposed to worrying about whether that’s accomplished by running or passing.  In any event, the point to being balanced is that you’re trying to prevent a defense from keying in and making your offense one-dimensional and thus supposedly easier to stop.

Now we can add to that balance, Gary Danielson style.  Danielson has famously struggled to come to terms with the success of the spread offense.  What to say about the success Auburn is having running the ball this season, so much so that it’s ignoring the passing game like a Paul Johnson wannabe?  Well, hey, you can chalk that up to a mutant vision of balance.

“Let’s talk about Auburn and the word balance,” Danielson said. “Alabama really strives for balance. They believe in it. They believe it makes them better at the other part of it. When they’re running it, they think it makes them better at passing. When they’re passing, they think it makes them better at running.
“But Auburn’s definition of balance is different. They’re definition of balance is you have to be balance(d) enough to what the defense is giving you. And they believe they can run the ball enough almost in a wishbone-esque way that when they have to throw the ball they can do it and they’re good enough to do it.
“But they don’t have to  do it until (the defense) tells them they have to do it. That means committing so many men to the run game that the level of passing sophistication doesn’t have to be the same as Alabama’s, LSU’s or Georgia’s. They can throw it differently.”

Ho-kay.  That just strikes me as doing what a good offensive coordinator should do, which is figuring out the matchups that favor your team the most and exploiting them until the defense stops them.  That’s no small thing, as anybody who’s read this post and agrees with me can attest.  But balance?  Eh.  Going into today’s game, the Tigers are running the ball 71.2 percent of the time, less often than only New Mexico, Air Force, Georgia Tech, Army and Navy.  As that linked article indicates, they’re running at that level because they’re doing it very, very well and their opponents aren’t able to stop it.

Yeah, I know Marshall won the Mississippi State game at the end with his arm.  But that’s not where Auburn is right now.  What I can’t figure out is what happens if Georgia’s defense forces Auburn to become less reliant on the running game.  There’s a balance that’s a little mysterious to me right now.  And maybe a little scary, too.  Perhaps the best thing that the Dawgs handle the run and Malzahn stays too stubborn too long by sticking with it.  The problem with that is that he’s too good a playcaller not to adapt.


Filed under Auburn's Cast of Thousands, Strategery And Mechanics