Mike Bobo caught grief about one bad call, but overall, I thought he had a good game against South Carolina. Georgia scored 35, should have scored a good bit more, and racked up over 400 yards on a night with bad weather and a sputtering offensive line. Most of the problems on offense could be chalked up to execution.
The defense had its share of execution problems, too.
“I think there’s a combination of just tightening down the screws just a little bit as far as when we are in certain coverages making sure we’re forcing them to throw to check-downs and then come up and break on the ball and make tackles instead of jumping some of the underneath routes,” Richt said. “We jumped on some underneath routes that opened up some things behind us…”
But the truth is that Jeremy Pruitt got schooled by Steve Spurrier, who very obviously spent time carefully reviewing the Clemson tape.
Now Pruitt doesn’t have the skill position talent to deploy that Bobo does, so to some extent he deserves a pass. We all know the secondary is going to be Georgia’s weak link this season and without consistent pressure from some combination in the front seven, the secondary stands to be exposed. And that’s definitely what happened in the first half, as Pruitt played a soft zone behind his front and watched his pass defense get picked apart by throws over the middle as Thompson had all the time he needed to set up and play pitch and catch with his receivers.
Pruitt seemed to blitz Sanders a good bit, but to little success. The pass rush improved when Drew was inserted into the d-line, but the night’s only sack came on an inside linebacker blitz.
The Dawgs did alright handling the run in the first half – Ramik Wilson played his ass off in that regard – but when Thompson throws for 270 yards, that kind of gets glossed over.
The second half came and Pruitt adjusted to try to take away some of the vulnerability over the middle. The problem for him was that Spurrier adjusted as well and began attacking the outside with the running game. The Gamecocks only threw the ball a handful of times in the second half, but then, again, they really didn’t need to.
That being said, when Georgia found itself late in the third quarter down by eleven, Georgia managed a defensive stop that let it claw back to within three. And Pruitt won the chess match on the Swann interception, when Thompson was clearly confused by the coverage.
We all knew before the season started that the defense was going to be a work in progress. The fourth quarter against Clemson wasn’t a mirage so much as it was a situation that Georgia couldn’t get to against South Carolina, when the defense could dictate to the offense because the offense’s options were squeezed. (Which is why I disagree with those of you who think Spurrier would still have had an easy time of it if Georgia had managed to score a touchdown on that infamous first and goal series.) So we really shouldn’t be surprised by what we saw in Columbia.
When Georgia’s offense is clicking against a team that doesn’t have a passing attack that can take advantage of the flaws in the pass coverage, the Dawgs will be fine. Fortunately for them, there don’t seem to be too many teams on the schedule that have the ability to exploit Georgia secondary. But overall, the lesson from Columbia is that we’re at least a season away from having a shut down defense to cheer for.
*************************************************************************
UPDATE: Cory Brinson illustrates some of the defensive breakdowns here.
*************************************************************************
UPDATE #2: And here’s a nice example of how Spurrier schemed to exploit Pruitt’s defense.
You must be logged in to post a comment.