A really futile and stupid gesture

The Pac-12 presidents have a bug up their collective butts about the NBA’s eligibility rule.  Evidently, they’ve had all they can take on one-and-done and are ready to do something about it.  Something dumb.

The item was No. 7 on a 10-point list for NCAA reform ideas that Pac-12 presidents and chancellors sent their Power Five colleagues last May.

7. Address the “one and done” phenomenon in men’s basketball. If the National Basketball Association and its Players Association are unable to agree on raising the age limit for players, consider restoring the freshman ineligibility rule in men’s basketball.

Several conference commissioners say it’s time to consider making freshmen — or at least some of them — ineligible, again, for the first time since the NCAA rule changed in 1972.

Let’s get past the immediate consequence of such a move – John Calipari’s business model would be completely blown up, as no very highly rated high school senior will likely enroll in college again – and look at the tangled web being weaved as these wise men try to come up with justifications that sound more noble than “we don’t like being used by the NBA”.

The opposition to freshman ineligibility would be heated — and some conference commissioners strongly oppose it already. Others believe now is the time to consider it again given court cases that could allow players to be paid, congressional scrutiny into college sports and a unionization attempt to make Northwestern football players designated as employees. A new lawsuit against the NCAA and North Carolina attacks the heart of the NCAA’s stated mission: Are enough high-profile college athletes truly being educated?

Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said there is “almost a uniform acknowledgment that there’s kids in college that don’t have any interest in an education and don’t have the proper education to take advantage of an education.” Bowlsby said freshman ineligibility would have a “profoundly positive effect” on football and men’s basketball by easing the transition from high school without the distractions of competition.

“I think there’s a growing interest in a robust debate, and I think we ought to drag it to the ground and consider it any way we can,” Bowlsby said. “I think it is the one change that could make an absolutely dramatic difference in college athletics.”

Oh, so now you want to talk about educating them, those “… kids in college that don’t have any interest in an education and don’t have the proper education to take advantage of an education”?  (By the way, since we’re being all brainy and academic here, shouldn’t it be “who” instead of “that”?)  How exactly does a year without sports light that fire?  (Please note that I’m not talking about a kid needing time to acclimate himself to the college life; that’s a different story and one where I can concede not playing freshman season can have an impact.)  But if a kid doesn’t care and doesn’t have the academic background coming in, how can you fix all that just by denying him sports for a season?

Keep in mind, I mention this here because while the impetus comes from the NBA rule, the rationale for the move could apply to any collegiate sport, including our favorite.

Another thing about Bowlsby’s comment here worth noting is that we’re now heading into the new era of raised NCAA high school academic standards, where kids have to have a certain amount of core curriculum studies, along with better grades and test scores, to be eligible for college athletics.  Is Bowlsby dismissing that before it’s even been tested?

And let’s not forget, as Solomon points out, there’s already something a school can do for a kid who comes in academically unprepared.

Players who meet the old academic standards — but not the new ones — can receive an academic redshirt. It’s a new version of the old partial qualifier with one important exception — the player does not lose a year of eligibility. Academic redshirts can receive a scholarship and practice with their teams but cannot compete. If they pass nine credit hours in their first semester, they can compete the next season as a redshirt freshman.

So let’s face it.  This is largely bullshit.  Although, in typical thinking from the idiots running the sport, putting limits on the kids instead of punishing institutions that are guilty of academic fraud, or putting the screws to schools who try to sound serious but are simply addressing academics with a mere wink and a nod (“Bobby Petrino gets $500,000 for getting five points above the minimum APR.”) makes more sense.  Because you don’t have to work as hard to make yourself feel better.  With the NCAA, a little hypocrisy is good for the soul.

16 Comments

Filed under Academics? Academics., The NCAA

16 responses to “A really futile and stupid gesture

  1. PTC DAWG

    I think that “one and done” stinks as far as College Basketball does..makes a mockery of the student athlete.

    Like

    • W Cobb Dawg

      Agree. Not that I’d ever agree with Bowlsby, et. al., but something needs to be done – probably akin to the 3 year rule in football. Like Gaskilldawg says below, the players who aren’t interested in college have other options.

      Like

  2. One small quibble, while I really like college football, basketball is my favorite sport. On to a less self directed comment, the dummies do not see that the guys talented enough to be one and done guys have options the first year out of high school that do not include playing on freshman teams in college. Professional basketball is huge all over the world. Those guys can play overseas and make money rather than playing freshman basketball for an actual cost of attendance stipend.

    if the colleges think that eliminating freshman eligibility will influence the NBA and the NBA Players Association they are stupid.

    Like

  3. Walt

    How does Bob Bowlsby keep his job? This is the same dope who refused to name either TCU or Baylor conference champ in football. I think TCU was a more worthy playoff team than FSU, but BB basically told the committee to make a decision for him and that opened the door for OSU.

    Like

  4. Walt

    He picked co-champs, and seemed to make the decision himself. http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11992137/baylor-bears-coach-art-briles-criticizes-big-12-co-champions-policy

    Please correct me if I am wrong.

    Like

  5. WVMtnDawg

    Came across this article. Is marshall now the first school to approve cost of attendance schollys?

    http://www.herald-dispatch.com/sports/marshall/x2146074992/MU-to-pay-athletes

    Like

  6. DawgByte

    Good for the PAC-12 Presidents… bravo!

    One and done is doing no favors for college basketball and I welcome any rules that makes such a practice more difficult. I’m sick to death of HS prima-donnas using universities and colleges as a spring board to the league. Perhaps Blutarsky can spend some time researching the career duration of the average professional athlete and while he’s at it he can decipher the % of athletes that blow through all their millions within 3 years of existing their chosen sport. Fall back plan? Hmmmm…

    Like

    • Basketball is my favorite sport and I would love it if college players stayed all four years as they wished to do so, but it is a development the colleges have no control over. The NBA and the NBA Players Association collectively bargain the terms regarding when a player is eligible for the draft. The NBA Players Association realizes that collective bargaining cannot affect Father Time. Every player has an expiration date on his ability to perform at a NBA level. So, for the players, the incentive is to get to the free agent status earlier in life rather than later in life. If a kid has to wait until age 22 to enter the draft he loses 4 years before he finishes the first contract negotiated after the draft. If he has to wait just one year after high school then he gets a chance to have three extra years of big money second contract. The NBA would like HS kids to wait until age 20 to be draft eligible. It is just one collective bargaining issue.

      The desires of college coaches and college basketball fans are irrelevant to either side. There is nothing the colleges can do to influence the negotiations between the two sides.

      There are zero rules the NCAA or the conferences can pass that will cause the NBA to raise the minimum age for entry in the draft.

      So, how does the PAC 12 proposal make it more difficult for kids to leave after one year? As a college basketball fan the proposed rule does not make a John Wall more likely to stay three or four years as UK, while depriving you and me the joy of watching a year’s worth of play from talented players.

      Like

  7. Huntindawg

    I have little interest in college hoops because of the one-and-done. I’ve asked this before: wouldn’t it be cool if we had real students playing sports for their schools?

    Like

  8. We do. It’s is called division III. The Ivy League also has real students playing.

    I am game. Let’s go the Ivy League route.

    Like