The NCAA’s defense in the the UNC academic fraud litigation is flat-out embarrassing.
The NCAA reiterated there’s no “viable legal claim” against the association when schools break NCAA rules. The NCAA wrote that it “did not voluntarily assume a legal duty to ensure the academic integrity of courses offered by its member institutions,” and that its enforcement model “creates no legal duty to prevent NCAA members from violating NCAA rules.”
Which totally explains why Mark Emmert went medieval on Penn State’s ass.
Look, I get that lawyers gotta lawyer and all. That’s not the NCAA’s problem. The NCAA’s problem is that it’s fighting so many wars on so many fronts that it’s contradicting itself from court to court. And that’s not the lawyers’ fault. It’s the result you get when the client is stubborn to the point of idiocy.