Daily Archives: August 9, 2015

Another clue to the new

Among the many things we ponder as Georgia sweats its way through preseason practice is how Jeremy Pruitt is going to get his power trio of Carter, Floyd and Jenkins together on the field as much as possible.

Welp, maybe here’s a hint at what’s coming.

During Georgia’s first week of preseason practice, Kimbrough has been working first-team in both the base 3-4 and nickel defenses. He’s joined by Leonard Floyd in the base defense, and by Carter in the nickel, with Floyd at the star.

Emerson notes that “the situation is fluid”.  There’s more than one way that can cut, of course.  But it’s certainly tantalizing to contemplate what Pruitt can pull off with that rotation.

12 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

Hey, Coach, what do we do with these patches?

There are times when I wonder if Mark Richt trolls us fans.  Here’s an example:

Georgia players have black patches on the back of jerseys that is being used to track electronically movement. “What it’s doing is just giving us an idea of the volume of running, how much distance are they traveling, what speed are they traveling, how often do they hit maximum speeds,” Richt said. “You learn about just the volume of work that they’re doing.”

Sounds good, eh?  Compiling a little 21st century cutting edge body data can’t hurt anything, right?  Well, except if…

Richt said Georgia is still trying to determine how to use the data.

Maybe they’ll use the patches to decide who wins the quarterback derby.

24 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Science Marches Onward

Whatever happened to… Billy Bennett?

Quite a lot, actually.

19 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

“Mediamageddon”, or don’t cry for Mickey, Argentina?

Disney’s stock price took a major hit last week over potentially gloomy news about the long-term health of ESPN’s business model, which is incredibly profitable for its parent company.  That, in turn, has led to some fascinating speculation about where the delivery of live sports broadcasting may be headed in the next ten years.

In one corner, you have this fairly pessimistic assessment – from the WWL’s point of view, that is – that sees the key to the future in the NFL contract that comes up for negotiation in 2020.

No Telethon Yet!

I don’t think we need to have a telethon to benefit the poor media giants just yet, but if you want to understand the time horizon to Mediamageddon, you need only look to the NFL.

December 2020

Sometime circa December 2020, a deal is going to be reached between the television networks and the NFL. The last deal was inked in December 2011, and it extended the NFL’s various television rights packages by nine years from 2013 through 2022 for about $27 billion. What will that deal cost TV in 2020? Forty billion dollars? With TV ratings trending ever downward, will any television network or combination of television networks be able to pay that kind of licensing fee?

Apple/NFL The End of Days

Apple will have its Apple TV product firmly established by 2020. It has the cash. Will we be watching the NFL streamed live on Apple TV in 2022? Apple could probably purchase the entire NFL, but that’s for another column.

NFL D-T-C

In 2022 will the NFL go direct to consumer – over the top – at let’s say $2.99 per game? The upside for the NFL would be huge. Although the audience would be smaller, it would be more affluent, and the direct-to-device data collection would empower unprecedented changes in the way marketers communicate their messages to consumers. No Nielsen ratings, just deterministic data enabling real-time metrics about campaign efficacy – advertiser heaven!

As Goes the NFL

The television business may be good or it may be bad. There may be headwinds or course corrections. Ups, downs, new technologies, the discovery of life on other planets, retinal implants to replace TV monitors – none of it matters. The TV business will be the TV business until the new NFL deal is done. If the TV industry comes up with enough cash to satisfy the NFL, it will be business as usual (declining ratings, higher spot prices, better targeting, etc., etc.) for the duration of the new contract.

If the NFL and the TV industry do not come to terms, it will be Mediamageddon and life as we know it will end. There will be no more media giants, no more meaningful networks that can deliver a live audience at scale and no more “tent pole” events with big-enough television audiences to command the budgets they currently command.

OTT distribution of the NFL, whether via Apple or Netflix or Comcast Xfinity or Verizon/AOL or direct-to-consumer from the NFL itself (probably courtesy of BAMTech), will be the destroyer of rate bases, the killer of reach curves and the advent of super-tight consumer targeting and transactional advertising on connected devices. The change will be so dramatic, the NFL might not have the motivation (or the courage) to do it as soon as 2020.

Well, gosh, I guess it’ll be up to the bold thinkers running the show for college football to lead the way, then.

Hey, a little humor is good for the soul.

There is another way to look at this, though.  If the NFL decides to go its own way, that’s going to make whatever other live sports broadcasting is still available for ESPN to buy even that much more valuable to it.  And if there’s one thing ESPN understands, it’s that the more it has, the merrier.

In July, The Wall Street Journal cited analysts that said ESPN would need to charge $30 for an over-the-top offering to bring in the same amount of money it currently does inside a cable bundle.

Given that about 100 million cable subscribers pay about $6 a month for ESPN, this assumes that 20 million people, or about 20% of current cable subscribers, sign up for a separate ESPN offering.

Which, if ESPN has effectively all sports you need to watch, seems like a fairly realistic target to Thompson. In this scenario, you’re betting that one in five current cable subscribers really likes sports and will pay a premium for ESPN.

Or to put it more simply, one simple reason why ESPN will probably be fine: They own basically everything.

Make sure you read the linked article at stratechery.com, as it goes into some depth about how Netflix offers a business model that ESPN could eventually embrace for survival.

To a greater extent than even before, ESPN is sports. It’s the only channel you need. In fact, its biggest problem is that there simply isn’t enough time in the day to view all of the inventory the network has rights to. That, though, is a solved problem: Netflix showed 7 years ago that streaming makes time constraints immaterial. Iger noted:

Those new deals all provide for more programming, more opportunity for content on digital platforms, which will enable us to increase consumption on digital platforms and grow that business even more and generally more flexibility in terms of how we distribute this product. So the NBA’s a great example. You can have a huge increase in essentially inventory on ESPN across its platforms. So while there is definitely increasing costs, there is a huge increase in terms of opportunity as well to reach more people, to serve advertisers more effectively and to grow our digital platforms.

The selfish question we consumers of college football should be asking ourselves is has anyone responsible for production of the product begun thinking about the consequences of how this may shake out over the next decade?  I mean, it’s not like college football won’t have a few broadcast deals of its own to negotiate between now and 2025.

In the end, one thing’s for sure.  If the 800-pound gorilla gets the hiccups, everyone else in the room is gonna shake.

5 Comments

Filed under ESPN Is The Devil

Missouri and the SEC East? It’s not like you haven’t been warned.

Bill Connelly has a pretty good head-heart debate here in his Mizzou preview.

Lots of good stuff in there about a team that none of us should be taking for granted anymore, but if I’m reading Bill’s piece correctly, beating the Tigers this season is going to come down to running the ball on offense and stopping the run on defense.  I believe somebody once called that “old-man football”.

Oh, and if you’re not sure how dominant Georgia’s win in Columbia last season was, check out Bill’s numbers on Missouri’s 2014 schedule.  Not that it changes what happened in Jacksonville any.  Sigh.

7 Comments

Filed under SEC Football

“Bottom line: nobody is bigger than the team around here …”

I probably ought to start a pool to pick the day when Duke Williams gets reinstated to the first team at dear ol’ Second Chance U.

4 Comments

Filed under Auburn's Cast of Thousands

Oh, wait. You people were serious about that?

The city of Birmingham pledged $500,000 a year in support for UAB football, but neglected to include that amount in its just passed budget, because, according to Birmingham Finance Director Tom Barnett, the city had not anticipated that it would need to deliver on that promised funding so soon.

Too bad you can’t spend bullshit.  Oh, yeah, along those lines…

The UAB football program still has the mayor’s support, the finance director said.

As the cliché goes, that and five bucks will get you a mocha latte at Starbucks.

3 Comments

Filed under It's Not Easy Being A Mid-Major, Political Wankery