Observations from the 35, Senior Night edition

Well, winning is better than losing, so in that sense the Dawgs had a good night on Saturday.  But they sure didn’t make it easy on themselves or us along the way.

  • Boy, that first series Georgia ran was a pleasure to watch, wasn’t it?  Obviously scripted, and nicely set up by a 40-yard kickoff return from Reggie Davis, the offense looked crisp and confident.  Lambert even managed to hit Chigbu on what looked like his third read.  There was also a good throw to Malcolm Mitchell where Lambert took advantage of very soft coverage.  The fly sweep with McKenzie was marked by perfect timing on the hand off and great downfield blocking (although it could be argued that Mitchell got away with a wee bit of holding).
  • It would prove to be the offense’s best series of the night, unfortunately.  The next series saw the blocking start to break down and a resulting sack of Lambert.  That was salvaged by a Ramsey punt downed at the GSU one.  After forcing another three-and-out, Georgia looked to be in business, setting up in Southern territory, only to see things fall apart when Mitchell fumbled the ball after Lambert read the defense well and hit him on a quick slant.
  • And that was pretty much how most of the night went for the offense – moments of good calls and execution eventually hamstrung by untimely turnovers, ineffective play calling, bad line play or inconsistent play from Lambert.
  • In particular, third down plays continue to be sad things to watch.
  • The offensive line had a rough night.  The main culprit was Hunter Long, who struggled with run blocking and pass protection, but there were misses by almost everyone.  The unit appeared to lack cohesion and did a bad job communicating who had responsibility in the face of GSU’s stunts and blitzes.
  • Lambert was his usual self, some good, some bad, some luck.  He should have been intercepted twice, but skipped both throws.  (And, no, it wasn’t on purpose.)  He continues to miss open receivers frequently and has a hard time deciding to throw the ball away when the play isn’t there.  To his credit, he had some nice passes out of play action, where he looks comfortable, and did check down on occasion.
  • Bottom line, the offense continues to look discombobulated.  It was no surprise that it failed to gain 300 yards in regulation for what has to be the umpteenth time this season.  After eleven games, and against another defense that, while physical and well-coached, isn’t going to be confused with Alabama’s or Florida’s, that’s a little depressing.
  • The defense, though, continued its good work, although it took a little time after some early success.  After shutting the Eagles down in the first two series, the defense struggled with contain on the outside option stuff and was burned by a couple of good plays by the quarterback.  There were a few missed tackles that contributed to GSU’s success, too.
  • Pruitt’s halftime adjustments were effective, as they’ve been for the past few games.
  • While Floyd and Jenkins had monster games, some of the credit for that has to go to the defensive line, which turned in one of its best efforts of the season.  Georgia Southern struggled to run up the middle all game – something the triple option has to do well to flourish – and on plays that were flushed to the edges, Georgia’s line did a good job of engagement so that the linebackers were free to roam and make plays.  All of that with Trent Thompson out of the lineup.
  • It’s getting routine to say this, but Ganus and Parrish turned in another set of solid performances.  Ganus is one tough son of a gun.
  • I can’t say how big Bellamy’s sack was, since it still left GSU with what appeared to be a makeable field goal, but it certainly didn’t hurt.  And he deserves credit for playing that right, especially considering he got yanked the week before for overpursuit.
  • Special teams play?  Well, Ramsey did his part, helping Georgia maintain field position early on (not that it amounted to much).  Davis, as I mentioned, managed an excellent return to get the game off to a good start.  Morgan was shaky, missing one field goal and banking an extra point.  The coverage teams didn’t allow anything damaging to speak of.
  • Richt continues to squeeze what he can get out of this team.  The Dawgs survived their usual second quarter swoon, didn’t panic after the McKenzie fumble that led to GSU’s second touchdown, or after the Eagles took a fourth quarter lead and then stepped up and took the game away in overtime.  You can bitch about his being conservative with the calls at the end of both halves, but with the way the offense was going, what exactly could he have done with it?  It’s not like he’s got Aaron Murray back there directing traffic.

It was a game that felt like early on Georgia was going to dominate (and it would have likely gone in a different way if Mitchell doesn’t fumble and they take it in to go up 14-0), then felt like it was sliding away in the second quarter and for much of the third.  At least the Dawgs managed to find their footing in time to pull it out.  It should have been a comfortable win, but that’s not the way this team rolls.

In other words, this season in a nutshell.  Don’t expect anything different this week.

66 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

66 responses to “Observations from the 35, Senior Night edition

  1. Bright Idea

    The one thing Richt’s teams always do is play their butts off. If they didn’t they would have lost this game because Southern certainly was playing their tails off. Leonard Floyd obviously thought he was back in high school in this game. He just turned it loose.

    Like

    • No, they do not always do that.

      Like

      • Derek

        One thing that Georgia fans do, without exception, is pull for Georgia to win, right Chili?

        Pretty pathetic for you to claim that players don’t always give effort. IF they sometimes lie down (and I’m not saying that they do) I hope that they have people like you in mind. I wouldn’t play hard for fans like you either. You clearly don’t deserve consistent effort given your half-assed support.

        Like

        • So to be clear, you’re adding me to your list of excuses why Richt isn’t to blame for anything, right?

          Like

          • Derek

            The only pertinent excuse related opinion I have is that you are a sorry excuse for a Georgia fan.

            I’ve never said that CMR isn’t to blame for anything. What I’ve said is that firing him at this juncture is dumb. You can have two independent thoughts in your head at the same time. You can both not be entirely content with things AND not think a change is in the program’s interest. Its a complex world you know.

            For example, Saddam was a bad guy. But taking him out would lead to a power vacuum that would likely be worse for the region and for the world. To the extent Saddam is a dictatorial MF-er at least he’s a largely contained dictatorial MF-er. Unseating him could unleash the gates of hell. But, some people, probably you among them, want a President that they can have a beer with and a football coach who doesn’t have time for that shit.

            Like

  2. IAmAChubbyMan

    “The one thing Richt’s teams always do is play their butts off.”

    lol. This is completely absurd. They quit after the pick 6 against Bama. They quit last year against Florida. You must be thinking it is still 2002.

    Like

  3. AO

    I don’t. (sigh)

    Like

  4. Nate Dawg

    Don’t want to get bogged down in details, but I didn’t understand the fade route to MM on that late 4th or maybe 3rd down play? I mean why throw a touch pass in that situation that has to be a perfect throw? I think Lambert has proven he’s got problems with that and in the ultimate irony, he actually throws a pretty good ball off MM’s fingertips that he just couldn’t haul in – resulting in yet another drive killing, momentum killing play. These are the things that frustrate me so greatly. Why not something over the middle and let MM (or anybody really) take his chances at running for the first. Or maybe even throw it past the marker. But what do I know…
    Anyway, defense looked good to great on the whole and I think, I THINK if Dawgs win the turnover battle they should/can beat the nerds. But turnovers could be the key cuz that’s the main thing that kept GSU alive in my opinion.

    Like

  5. Was nice to see Chigbu get some extended action, that was the most I can remember seeing him play. Had a couple of catches and I noticed him on a couple of downfield blocks. Looks like he has the makings of a solid WR down the road.

    Speaking of other freshmen though, especially on defense, was it just me or did we barely see guys like Briscoe, McGraw, Abram, and Smith? Perhaps a function of Senior Day? Or just relying on the veterans due to the triple option stuff? I saw Patrick a good bit on special teams and he was in for a couple of snaps on D, but I can’t remember seeing Roquan at all the past 2 games, is he hurt or have I just missed him?

    We are definitely lucky that Ganus fell in our laps this year. I thought he was gonna be a “depth” guy, especially after G-Day when he mostly ran with the 2’s, but I don’t know what we would have done without him. I’d hate to think that Floyd would still be having to play ILB this late in the year. And to both Ganus and Ekeler’s credit, Ganus seems to have improved throughout the year. Things he would get burned on early in the year, he’s now reading much better. No doubt we are better with him than we would have been otherwise.

    Like

  6. Debby Balcer

    It was frustrating to watch things almost come together and then stall. This offense has no chemistry.

    Like

  7. Cojones

    While looking for answers, we have lamented the play of the O-line for being part of the problem. Dissecting a little further, we now see how much David Andrews is missed and why he is playing in the NFL. He was our lynchpin.

    Earlier, Kublanow was getting his share of the opponent’s D because it is recognized as a weak point with Andrews gone. The D has been penetrating regularly at the Center position and by inserting Hunter Long, we see that the focus continues at that O-line point by the way GSU poured through the middle.

    I don’t like it when a player’s name is used as the reason for bad times and would think by now we would have settled down about Lambert who is batting above 60% consistently, but somehow is held responsible for other’s mistakes. Senator, you at least balanced some good and bad to describe Lambert’s game after first indicting him by name. Yes indeed, I felt that Mitchell’s whiff was a turning point as well. Following Lambert’s game closely, you can see he gets rid of the ball better and waits longer for a receiver to get open before throwing it away, but still falls back on getting away from the D pouring through by making a bad running decision or two for extra yards lost from a sack. Those all go together to make him a good QB who is getting better in our system (excuse me for a moment – I see another pile that’s big enough to have a pony underneath).

    The point being made is that the Center position is hurting the overall O-line (with some help) more than we have posted about and that in turn is hurting our QBs from being all they could be. So goes CFB across the board, but we have failed to pinpoint the problems as they appear to fans and have begun to devour our own. Let’s put a stop to this and concentrate on the next NAT TEA in Atlanta this weekend, lick our wounds after the SECCG is played and lobby for the best bowl possible.

    Sic’em, Dawgs! Woof! Woof!

    Like

  8. paul

    Earlier this year I thought perhaps the Missouri game may have been the most frustrating football game I had ever watched. I remember saying I could not remember feeling so bad about a win. I think Georgia Southern may have topped that. The truly sad thing was watching our guys celebrate like they had actually won something. Gentlemen, it was Georgia Southern. That they took us to overtime at home was an embarrassment in every conceivable way. Perhaps most astounding was that they generally controlled the line of scrimmage. Georgia Southern was winning in the trenches for most of the night. That ain’t good.

    Like

    • D.N. Nation

      “THERE AIN’T NOTHING LIKE BEING A BULLDOG ON SATURDAY NIGHT—–AFTER WINNING A FOOTBALL GAME.”

      Erk didn’t mention style points. Let a bunch of 19-year-old kids be happy for winning a football game for an hour or two.

      Like

      • paul

        True that. I am fortunate enough to have smoked a couple of cigars and downed a few beers with Erk. He was as damned fine a Dawg as there ever was. I miss him. I think he would like Pruitt. Shotty? I don’t know.

        Like

    • You thought GSU’s offensive line controlled the line of scrimmage? That’s not what I saw.

      As for being sad over the kids being happy with the win, sometimes you’ve got to forget the journey and just enjoy the moment.

      Like

      • paul

        They did for chunks of the game. Southern’s average yards per carry was 4.4. Ours was 4.3. Given that they’re GSU and we’re UGA that ain’t good. You correctly pointed out that ‘[a]fter shutting the Eagles down in the first two series, the defense struggled with contain on the outside option stuff.’ And the networks reminded us that prior to this year our narrowest margin of victory over Georgia Southern was 20 points. I know a win is a win but we seem to be inventing new ways to win ugly every week. It’s disheartening to me. We do not seem to improve as the season progresses. Our offensive line in particular appears to be disintegrating with each and every game. They were a pretty good unit last year and most of us expected them to be the strength of this team. Remember when we were all saying we didn’t really need a quarterback? Just hand the ball off and let the line and backs do their thing. That’s what most of us thought going into the season. Well, not so much huh?

        Like

        • GaskillDawg

          The yards per game average included a 48 yard scramble by a QB, a 20 yard QB draw, and a 23 yard run by the halfback on a busted play. That is 91 of GSU’s 233 yards rushing and was not the result of GSU controlling the line of scrimmage on those plays. Subtract those 3 plays and GSU gained 142 yards on 50 rushing attempts, which averages 2.84 yards per carry. Some of those 142 yards were on option pitches, which also are not line of scrimmage plays Our defense controlled the line of scrimmage.

          Like

          • Biggus Rickus

            That wasn’t a 48 yard scramble. It was an option keeper. I agree with your general sentiment though. The defense only allowed one halfway decent drive in the second half.

            Like

            • GaskillDawg

              Even if we characterize it as an option keeper, by definition it is outside the line of scrimmage and therefore was not a play on which GSU dominated our line of scrimmage.

              Like

              • Biggus Rickus

                Characterize it? It’s what it was. It’s not like there’s some grey area. Also, I consider losing contain on the edge an aspect of losing the line of scrimmage. If it’s not, then Georgia owned the line of scrimmage against Florida last year, too. However, after the first half, they dominated the line against Southern.

                Like

              • Will (The Other One)

                Yeah, but that’s not the same as getting dominated via getting pushed back (like giving up 3-4 yds on the dive play in the 2nd half last year, or all game in 2010 vs Tech.)

                Like

        • “Contain the outside option” stuff isn’t about winning the line of scrimmage.

          Take a look at Seth’s breakdown:

          Here’s how I charted Georgia Southern’s plays and their results, and please forgive me if it’s not easier to read but this is a pretty long process and not easy:

          Runs up the middle: 0, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 3, 1 (TD), 4, 4, 2 (high snap), 11, 1, 6, 4, 2, 2, -1, 4, 2, 0, -3 …. 24 for 59 yards.

          QB option keeper: 1, 5, 48 (to the left on third down), 1, 8, 4, 20 (draw play up the middle on third down), 0, 2 (was a 13-yard run but penalty on the block), 1 … 10 for 90 yards.

          Pitch: 7, -4, 1, 4 (converting a third down), 23 (pitch to right, reversed direction and went down left sideline), -5 (pitch was within the pocket, Jake Ganus all over the play), 6 (short of first down), 6, 11, -4 (Leonard Floyd had the QB and the pitch-man) … 10 for 45 yards.

          Simple run to the edge: 2, 4 (cut to outside), 0, 9 (cut too outside), 10, -1 … 6 for 24 yards.

          QB scramble: 9 (was a pass play), 14 (third down in OT) … 2 for 23 yards.

          GSU got nothing up the middle.

          Like

          • paul

            Nothing up the middle, that’s true. Personally, I believe outside contain is still the line of scrimmage. If a team gets to the edges, I don’t believe you can say you controlled the line of scrimmage. You’ve simply controlled the middle. The triple option is an offense predicated on continuing to chip away at a defense until someone misses an assignment and play pops. Our defensive line did a much better job than our offensive line, as has been the case all season. However, we still let GSU control the ball for 42 minutes and gain 233 rushing yards. Well below their season average but well above the 130 yards we gained on the ground. In short, we pretty much let them play the game they wanted to play. And they almost pulled off the upset.

            Like

            • Maybe we’re having an argument about semantics, then. I interpreted your comment to mean that GSU’s o-line physically dominated Georgia’s d-line, something I didn’t see. If all you mean is that the Eagles broke some big runs on the outside when contain broke down, can’t argue with that.

              Like

              • paul

                I think we are in agreement. I also think it is a very strange to feel so awful about what may turn out to be a 10 win season. As odd as it sounds, I believe this may be the worst 10 win team we’ve ever had. In a very real sense, we’ve been fortunate. Several of our games could have easily turned out badly. Ugly wins are often only a couple of plays removed from a rough loss.

                Like

        • Brandon

          You know whats uglier than an ugly win?

          Like

      • mikebozo

        Other than maybe 2 series our DL pretty much handled them

        Like

    • PTC DAWG

      Georgia Southern is a good team. Just happens to be the best team we have beaten this year. A win is a win. You think UF was unhappy to have beaten Florida Atlantic?

      Some folks just can’t be happy.

      Like

      • paul

        Georgia Southern is a good team. But they’re not a team the University of Georgia should have to struggle to beat. Like, ever. At least not in my opinion. I’m old. Maybe I’ve just become a grumpy old man. But this ain’t the way the Dawgs should be playing.

        Like

        • D.N. Nation

          “But this ain’t the way the Dawgs should be playing.”

          I do believe Georgia fans on the Internet have noted this for the historical ledger, yes.

          Like

        • gastr1

          Right…GSU is not substantially better than Kentucky or Vanderbilt. Would we be excited about an OT win at home over one of them?

          Like

          • GaskillDawg

            Since I paid a contribution to the Hartman Fund, paid for 4 season tickets, paid for gas round trip to Athens and invested my time in an event in which the possible outcomes are 1) win, or 2) lose, I was excited we won. You used the first person plural pronoun and I used the first person singular pronoun. I am not going to tell you what should make you excited.

            Like

    • kevinsauer

      the winners of the east were celebrating in similar fashion over a similar win. don’t forget to piss in their cheerios!

      Like

      • paul

        I live on St. Simons. I know plenty of Florida fans. They are a whole lot more upset with their team than I am with ours. Promise. Unlike us though, they’re not currently in danger of losing a coach they like. I have nothing but respect and admiration for Mark Richt. That’s why it pains me so to see this team appear to actually get worse week to week.

        Like

  9. Flukebucket

    “The main culprit was Hunter Long, who struggled with run blocking and pass protection”…Seems to me that if you can’t run block or pass block maybe the offensive line is just not your forte.

    Like

    • Derek

      Not that I blame them in the least but I think the Long brothers came from Memphis to Athens to drink beer and chase tail. I don’t think football (or, in Austin’s case, school) was the priority. If CMR played Saban’s game they would have both been “processed.”

      Like

      • sUGArdaddy

        I’ve got a friend in TN that hates it when we sign Memphis kids. He says the HS football there is terrible and that they usually don’t pan out or it takes forever. Marlon Brown took a loooooong time to get up to speed to the college game.

        Like

      • Fluke, spot on observation. I about spit out my lunch at that one I laughed so hard.

        Derek, you are dead on about the Long brothers. I’ve heard this exact thing from those in BM. Add video games to the list after chasing tail.

        Like

      • charlottedawg

        Drink beer and chase tail? Isn’t that what everyone comes to Athens to do?

        Like

  10. Argondawg

    I keep expecting to see our offense make progress every week and every week I am disappointed. I am just wondering what we have to build on? We have two serviceable tailbacks. Sony is a game changer but not who you want to run between the tackles all game and Douglas is a good player but not a game changer by any means. Hicks is not a tailback. Where is Turman? I saw that he was dressed out. The offensive line is an enigma. Our tight ends which should have been a weapon this year are just MIA. I have no idea why. Blazevich didn’t forget how to play since last year. You usually end every year knowing that certain aspects of your game are going to be a strength in the coming year. What part of our offense will be a strength next year? I do not see it.
    Then again we only ran 56 plays.

    The upside is our defense was stout most of the game.

    Also the Southern people seemed to have swiped up a good 25% of the stadium. When they had the scoop and score it sounded almost like we had scored. I have no doubt had we been playing some other small no name school we would have had record low attendance. Things should get interesting by next Monday regardless of the outcome.

    Like

  11. SouthGaDawg

    The only real star on offense was lost in the Tennessee game. Could you not agree with the rest – average WRs, average backs (other than Michel-he’s very good), average TEs, below average OL, below average QBs? We also appear to have an OC who is trying to run a Sunday game plan on Saturday.

    I think the SC game really skewed what we thought we had in this team. In hindsight, we were wrong. Spurrier quit mid-season and SC lost to the Citadel last week. If you look at the season as a whole with the talent level, we are who we think we are – just an average team.

    We’ve beaten who we are supposed to and lost to who we are supposed to. This sounds like a typical Donnan year. Now like all year, go out and look anemic on O, play great D and just Beat Tech.

    Like

    • mikebozo

      So you think Malcom Mitchell is average? He will be a star on Sundays

      Like

      • Daniel Simpson Day

        I hope so. Commented after his one catch that he really puts in 100% effort for YAC and fights for every yard. Glad to see because he’s a DGD.

        Like

      • Skeptic Dawg

        Yes, Malcolm Mitchell is an average WR. Mitchell, along with the rest of the WR corp, the OL and shaky QB play is why this team is struggles to move the ball, let alone score points. I find it amazing that this program so little offensive talent on hand. Beyond questionable play call, beyond Who is our QB, and beyond the poor OL lies the question of just how in the world did we end up in this situation.

        Like

        • mikebozo

          Below average QB’s will do that to a WR

          Like

          • Skeptic Dawg

            I am not disagreeing with anyone about the QB play this season. However, it is easy to single out one position group. If that were the case, the coaches would be able to gameplan around the one area of weakness and find a style or package of plays that work. The problem is not just poor QB play, it is the entire group that lacks talent, OL, WR and QB. This is why the offense looks so out of wack or discombobulated. It is tough to put a game plan together when you have inferior talent across the board. By no means am I giving the coaches a pass here either. It is their job to find something that works and coach kids up. I have yet to see that happen with our offense.

            Like

        • Brandon

          Ask any number of commenters here and they will tell you. Its all Richts fault

          Like

      • gastr1

        You must be joking.

        Like

  12. W Cobb Dawg

    So did we play down to GSU’s level or up to GSU’s level?

    Like

    • 92 grad

      I’d say that they only played to the level they had to. I love Floyd, and I’d tell him, but it’s a shame that beast mode hasn’t been there until they needed it. I don’t mean to be harsh. I’ve felt that the leadership has been questionable, more on the O and the team as a whole though. I hesitate to be critical of the D, period.

      Like

    • Like I texted my buddies during the 4th quarter:

      “Look on the bright side. We’ve managed to go toe-to-toe with a program that’s known for winning national titles.”

      🙂

      Like

  13. ApalachDawg

    Ganus is tough. I thought his knee was blown out by the gsu fullback.

    Like

  14. Brandon

    “Richt continues to squeeze what he can get out of this team.”

    Enough of this glass half full shit! We all know this team only wins in spite of Richt and loses because of him. #

    Like

  15. In summary, for this and many other blogs. Richt sucks, no he doesn’t. OC sucks, no he doesn’t, well maybe he does. Playerrs suck, no they do not. You are a poo poo head, you are a pee pee toes. No you are a poo poo toes and you are a pee pee head.
    Lather, rinse, repeat. Again, again and again.
    Almost forgot, Richt is responsible for all the worlds problems. No he isn’t Les Miles is.

    Like