Daily Archives: August 31, 2017

The SOD standard

I have no idea which anonymous SEC coach said this, but I can’t argue with any of it.

“I think Georgia is as talented as anybody in the league other than Alabama,” one coach said. “I think they underperformed last year. … They lost to Tennessee and should have won that game. They lost to Georgia Tech and Vanderbilt. That has got to get corrected. If Georgia goes 7-5, he’s Derek Dooley at Georgia. Derek was a 6-6 guy. It Kirby doesn’t get it done by his third year, they’ll fire his ass.”

“… he’s Derek Dooley at Georgia.”  Ouchy-ouch.

I just hope that doesn’t mean loud pants and shower hygiene lessons are in our future.  I don’t think I could take that.


UPDATE:  Regarding talent, coaching dude may have a point.




Filed under Georgia Football

Head vs. heart: a season preview

I’ve saved this Matt Hinton post from Monday to share with you, because it’s such a perfect summation of where I’m at assessing Georgia’s chances in 2017, and I wasn’t quite ready to write about that.  I’m not going to re-post everything he wrote, because you ought to hit the link and read what he came up with in its entirety, but his start…

Backing Into the Red and Black. I honestly didn’t see this coming, but … well, I guess it’s official: I’m on the Georgia bandwagon?

It wasn’t up to me. Every year, I put together a set of national rankings for every FBS team (we’re up to 130 of them now) based on five broad categories — Recent History, Talent/Recruiting, Experience, Offensive Production and Defensive Production; each category consists of three subcategories based on criteria like winning percentage, recruiting rankings, returning starts, etc. The upshot is that none of the results necessarily reflects my off-the-cuff conclusion when I’m eyeballing a depth chart.

So what to make of the fact that, after taking schedules into account, my foolproof system has pegged Georgia — an inconsistent program five years removed from its last division title, coming off an uninspiring, 8-5 finish in 2016 — not only as the runaway favorite to win the SEC East, but as a borderline Playoff contender? No other result at the top of my rankings was nearly as bold compared to the preseason consensus among other outlets, almost none of which project Georgia in the top 10. Am I prepared to defend UGA as a burgeoning elite? Really?

… and his finish…

… in much larger part it’s because Georgia’s pattern of underachieving over the past decade has made the Bulldogs reflexively hard to trust. Obviously Georgia has potential. But what distinguishes this team from the equally talented teams that finished unranked three of the past four years? From the outfit that lost to Ole Miss, Vanderbilt and Georgia Tech last year, and only narrowly survived scares from Missouri, Kentucky and Nicholls State?

The first step in answering those questions would be laying a solid, routine-looking whooping on the Mountaineers this weekend, where Georgia is a two-touchdown favorite. It’s still a long way from there to Atlanta in early December, but if the long-term goal is going to become a reality then serving notice that at least the 2017 edition won’t make a habit of playing down to the competition would be a very good start.

… just flat out nail everything I think and feel about this year’s team.

From a logical, intellectual perspective, there are a ton of positives about Georgia — returning experience on defense and at running back, which happen to be two of the most important areas for a team to prosper in the SEC; the best talent base in the division; a coaching staff (starting with the head coach) with a year together under their collective belts; a talent influx over the last two seasons that should help address special teams shortcomings; a schedule that isn’t too daunting (i.e., no Alabama) — that, combined with issues plaguing the key divisional rivals, make me think a 10-2 regular season and a SECCG berth are anything but far-fetched.

Then, emotionally, I remember all the disappointments that have been synonymous with Georgia football — not just last year’s embarrassments against Nicholls and Ole Miss, but flops against Tennessee in ’04 and ’07 that cost them trips to Atlanta; random, inexplicable losses to Vanderbilt; losing two of the last three games to Georgia Tech for no good reason; and, of course, Richt’s last two Cocktail Party debacles — and I can’t avoid the nagging feeling Georgia is still a program that can’t get out of the way of its own shadow.  Not only that, but to believe Georgia’s on the verge of a great leap, I have to put an uncomfortable amount of faith in Kirby Smart’s capacity for growth in his second year on the job.  When my heart ponders that, it sees 2017 coming out much the same as the previous four seasons have gone.

I believe I’ve mentioned this before, but I’m in a strange place with this. Normally it’s my heart that’s more optimistic than my head, but not this year.

In the end, it boils down to a simple question:  does Georgia finally have its shit together in 2017?  I wish I could tell you I knew for sure either way, but I don’t. However, I agree with Matt that we’re going to learn a lot from the opener, more than we normally would from watching this team start out against a mid-major program, which, lest we lose sight of Appalachian State’s Sun Belt membership because of what happened ten years ago, is the case.  (Lest we also forget, ASU was a team Georgia demolished the last time the two squared off in 2013.)

On Saturday, Georgia doesn’t have to beat the Mountaineers by 39 points to indicate a corner’s being turned (not that I’d complain if that were to happen). But it does have to show noticeable improvement in certain key areas to convince me that the coaches and players have at least located the corner and figured out how navigate it.  Mainly that would stem from controlling a game the way an SEC power playing a mid-major squad should control a game.

You don’t have to be an analytic genius to know what areas of the program have to step up to meet that standard of play in the opener.  We’ve certainly discussed them ad nauseam here over the course of the preseason.  I’m sure the coaches and players have, too.  If you’re Georgia, talking’s been the easy part.

One game does not a season make, of course.  A solid opening win is nothing more than a good start.  If things really are different this year, then that means we’ll see a team capable of sustaining good play from week to week.  In that regard, Notre Dame makes for a capable test.  Leave South Bend with a win and I expect the program will begin seeing a higher level of national respect.  The two games that follow next (Samford and Mississippi State) are winnable ones.

Which brings me to what from here appears to me to be the key game of the season.  It’s not Florida, although that likely will be a pivotal game in terms of winning the East.  It’s Tennessee.  A Georgia team riding high at 4-0 and a probable top ten ranking is the kind of Georgia team that’s gone up against the Vols in other seasons with high expectations only to spit the bit.  If this really is a different kind of year, that won’t happen.  That can’t happen.

We’ll know what kind of team we’ve got and we’ll know what kind of program Kirby is building after the Tennessee game.  Right now I’ll split the baby to say we’re looking at a nine-win regular season and a divisional battle that won’t be settled until the Auburn game.  But I reserve the right to change my mind after Knoxville.  And, man, do I want to.


Filed under Georgia Football

Look out, it’s MegaCast!

A reader thought it would be worth mentioning that ESPN’s going all out with tonight’s broadcast of the Indiana-Ohio State game.

ESPN will unleash its MegaCast production for Ohio State at Indiana on Thursday, Aug. 31 (8 p.m. ET), beginning the 2017 college football season with the most extravagant regular-season game presentation the sport has ever experienced. The multi-network creation will feature the traditional telecast on ESPN and six alternate offerings for fans on ESPNU, ESPNEWS and ESPN3. All previous versions of ESPN’s MegaCast have been reserved for the College Football Playoff Semifinals and National Championship games.

For one low, low price, you get Coaches Film Room (Les Miles!), what sounds like an abominable idea with Homers Telecast and a ton of camera angles and stats on ESPN3, in addition to Herbstreit on the main broadcast.

I can’t say I’m a huge fan of Mack Brown, but the other coaches ought to be good for some insight on the Coaches Film Room.  Plus, they’ll be skipping some commercials — never a bad thing.  The Homers thing sounds like it’s definitely worth avoiding, but I’ve enjoyed the All-22 looks before when CBS has used them.

Anyway, what’s your thought, useful or overkill?  (If you’re a the Big Ten is dead to me kind of person, you needn’t bother to answer.)


Filed under ESPN Is The Devil

Georgia vs. Appalachian State: it’s not you, it’s us.

Jason Butt does an excellent job exploring the story behind the point spread for the opener.  The reality is that ASU hasn’t done all that well against P5 programs since its historic win over Michigan ten years ago.

The Mountaineers, however, haven’t had much success against Power 5 programs since that win over Michigan. Since the 34-32 victory over Michigan, here is how Appalachian State has fared against Power 5 teams:

  • 2008: Loss vs. No. 7 LSU 41-13
  • 2010: Loss vs. Florida 48-10
  • 2011: Loss vs. No. 13 Virginia Tech 66-13
  • 2013: Loss vs. Georgia 45-6
  • 2014: Loss vs. Michigan 52-14
  • 2015: Loss vs. No. 12 Clemson 41-10
  • 2016: Loss vs. No. 9 Tennessee 20-13 in overtime
  • 2016: Loss vs. No. 25 Miami 45-10

Judging by recent point spreads, Appalachian State’s plus-14.5 line against Georgia isn’t out of the ordinary. In 2015, Clemson entered the game as a 17-point favorite. Tennessee was a 20.5-point favorite in last year’s close overtime win over the Mountaineers.

Miami was only a 3.5-point favorite before blowing out Appalachian State just a couple of weeks later. Obviously, the performance against Tennessee had a lot to do with this line.

When Georgia and Appalachian State played in 2013, the Bulldogs were only 11-point favorites. It seems evident that the oddsmakers in Las Vegas have respected Appalachian State a lot more since the Michigan win. But in totality, the Mountaineers have lost its last eight games against Power 5 opponents by an average of 34 points.

Hmm… maybe that’s why it’s called an upset.  However, even with that track record in mind, it’s not necessarily a stretch to be concerned about Saturday’s game, because the other side of the coin is that Georgia hasn’t consistently crushed lesser opposition lately.

When it comes to Georgia, however, it isn’t like the Bulldogs have been dominant against Group of 5 or FCS opponents in recent meetings. Here is how Georgia’s last five games against these opponents have gone:

  • 2015: Win vs. Louisiana-Monroe 51-14
  • 2015: Win vs. Southern 48-6
  • 2015: Win vs. Georgia Southern 24-17 in overtime
  • 2016: Win vs. Nicholls 26-24
  • 2016: Win vs. Louisiana-Lafayette 35-21

It’s worth noting that Georgia held only a 20-6 lead over Southern at the half. It’s also worth noting Georgia held a 35-7 lead against Louisiana-Lafayette before putting in the backups.

But in the three games it played against Georgia Southern, Nicholls and Lousiana-Lafayette, Georgia’s average margin of victory was only eight points.

Perhaps that explains Phil Steele’s attitude.


Filed under Georgia Football, What's Bet In Vegas Stays In Vegas

“We get it right there on the big screen.”

Georgia’s staff’s been showing the finish of the Appalachian State-Michigan in the weight room all week?  Hunh.

I dunno, guys, but it sure seems like you’d get a whole lot more mileage by replaying the Nicholls game.  Unless you’re trying to avoid making the players nauseous during game week.


Filed under Georgia Football

A Gator house divided against itself…

Boy, this sounds awkward.

Spectrum Sports has learned that a Florida Gators player implicated running back Jordan Scarlett and wide receiver Rick Wells into an ongoing investigation of a misuse of school issued funds.

According to a source, the Gators player named both Scarlett and Wells to the University of Florida Police Department.

I bet that’s one fun, relaxed locker room this week.


Filed under Gators, Gators...

“Travis knows he can make the most money possible by criticizing ESPN…”

I’m the last person who thought it was possible to feel sympathy for the WWL, but Clay Travis seems bound and determined to prove me capable of it.  Sheesh, what a dick.


Filed under ESPN Is The Devil, It's Just Bidness, Political Wankery

Bar’s closing, fellas. Last call for happy talk.

Okay, removing my tongue from my cheek, here’s a nice piece from Seth Emerson weaving together the thoughts of Chubb, Eason and Wynn on the prospects for the offense this season.

The most interesting insights are about the offensive linemen.  Here’s something Eason said that I hadn’t thought about:

Eason also spent much of this offseason working at taking snaps under center, after struggling with that aspect of it as a freshman. He was used to a shot-gun offense in high school.

EASON: “Oh yeah, that was a big area I needed to improve on. I think through spring and through this fall camp, I’ve gotten a lot more comfortable now. It’s second nature, going under there, spotting the Mike (linebacker) and all that deal. … It was pretty difficult, because you’re trying to read a defense, but your biggest concern is getting a snap from center. So that was a big transition, and it took me awhile to get me fully comfortable with it. And having (Brandon) Kublanow last year, he was a real low guy, and I was a real tall guy, so that was another thing that went into it. But now with Lamont (Gaillard) and whoever else we’ve got under center, I feel comfortable with it.”  [Emphasis added.]

Sounds trivial, but it’s just one more adjustment Eason had to make out of several.  I think it was pretty obvious that he was more comfortable working out of the shotgun last season than under center.

Wynn said something that makes me think Pittman is in the process of sorting out the talent on the line in the way he prefers.

Georgia brought its man-blocking scheme last year, but it wasn’t as successful with a smaller group of linemen. This year they’re going to be bigger up the middle, which should help the inside running game, while getting more athletic lineman at tackle.

WYNN: “Definitely. As far as me, my weight was pretty small last year at guard, but now we have a lot more anchor at that guard position, and the tackles, I’m good on the outside, Andrew Thomas he’s been very good, Dyshon Sims has been good. Not to say that the inside guys aren’t athletic, but we’ve put outside the guys who are better able to kick out there in space.”

I don’t know about you, but I’m ready to welcome the era of not playing guards at offensive tackle with open arms.


Filed under Georgia Football