Your eyes weren’t deceiving you.

Groo asks the musical question, “Was 3rd-and-Grantham really a thing?”

Apparently, yes.

But you knew that.

The question now is whether it still is.

19 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!

19 responses to “Your eyes weren’t deceiving you.

  1. Dawglicious

    Man, if 3rd and Kirby enters the lexicon, we’re in trouble!

    Like

  2. Dolly Llama

    The funny thing is that toward the end of that clip, when they’re showing a replay of the reception from ground level, one of the secondary guys is holding his palms up in confusion, like “What, what?” Just lost. Lord knows we saw a whole lot of that during the Grantham years. I’d just as soon never see it again.

    Like

  3. Jack Burton

    What really stands out to me is that most of our defensive players on that team wouldn’t have been recruited by Kirby. Not saying those guys werent 4 star high school players, but we have going after different looking dudes these days.

    Like

  4. Gaskilldawg

    I can’t believe you asked if 3rd and Grantham is really a thing. I read his posts daily!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Macallanlover

    Unless Chaney decides to use the play makers he has at his disposal this week. CTG may look better than he did at the Belk Bowl. Could be a nail biter in a game we should win by double digits. But I would not credit that to Grantham as much as a Chaney fail. We are a much better offensive group than LSU.

    Like

  6. 3rdandGrantham

    Dude, I could have told you that.

    Like

  7. Mayor

    During the last half of CMR’s tenure the end of game defensive epic failure causing the game to be lost became a common thing. Remember 2013 Auburn? 2005 Auburn too. Others as well. CMR was ultimately responsible as HC but in reality it was Willie and Grantham who were the culprits. The irony is that when CMR finally fixed the problem with the Pruitt hire was when he got fired.

    Like

  8. That is some shitty ass football.

    Like