More questions

Here’s what Kirby had to say in response to, “Dude, where are the screen passes?”:

Georgia coach Kirby Smart said it’s “hard to do” when opposing defenses tend to be focused so hard on the tailbacks.

“We don’t see traditional coverages,” Smart said. “People don’t play us the way we play people. The way people play us a lot of times is to take the run away. A lot of times it’s like that. It’s not as simple as calling a screen play. There’s more to it than that. We’re trying to find ways to get the backs the ball because we’ve got a lot of backs. But they cover our backs out of the backfield last week, and they cover our backs out of the slot. So you’re always trying to find a way to get them the ball. There’s no easy way against really good defenses.”

So what’s Georgia doing instead?

Georgia’s perimeter blocking by receivers also hasn’t been as good as Smart would like, he said, which is another reason the Bulldogs may be reluctant to call screens. So they tend to focus instead on explosive plays that have worked in previous games against the upcoming opponent.

“A lot of times you try to mimic those. We call it copycats,” Smart said. “We see the same plays each week: Auburn copied some plays that worked against us. So offensively you’re always trying to figure out what works on that defense.”

I’d say that didn’t work too well, but in reality, whatever the offensive game plan was, it became doomed once it was obvious that Auburn’s defense didn’t need to load the box to stop the run and could get effective pressure on Fromm out of its base four-man front.  If your o-line is getting blown up repeatedly, the screen pass probably won’t be much of a help.

That doesn’t explain the rest of the season, though.  As Seth notes, there was much made in the preseason about working on throwing to the running backs, but to this point, Georgia’s backs have a total of 20 receptions.

That being said, there is a certain amount of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” to Kirby’s attitude on the matter and I can’t exactly fault him for that.

A performance like at Auburn may send up some warning signs and concerns. But Georgia was pretty successful the first nine weeks and still ranks a respectable fifth in the SEC and 47th nationally in total offensive yards. The run-heavy philosophy helped get the Bulldogs to 9-0 and No. 1 in the country.

So the coaches aren’t trying to rip up the script quite yet.

“You’re looking for new ideas, new plays. But you can’t throw everything away and just start anew,” Smart said. “You’ve got certain plays you run, you’ve run them since camp. You try to window-dress them different ways. You try to execute better. Protect better. Give the quarterback a chance, maybe give him some easier throws. But you’re not trying to change everything, no. You’re just trying to play well against Kentucky.”

It’s not so much about ripping up the script, though, as having the foresight and flexibility to turn the page to a Plan B when the main plan isn’t working.  We didn’t see that on the Plains, and while they might not need to worry about that in the next two games, they soon will.

Yeah, I know that I’m starting to sound like a broken record.

105 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Strategery And Mechanics

105 responses to “More questions

  1. I’m sorry… every team I watch on Saturday runs screen plays. Be it traditional, tunnell, bubble… whatever. Hell, a TE screen to Nauta or Woerner sounds fun.

    We need to open up the playbook more. We should have done so when pounding bad teams, too.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Honest question. No snark intended. Can someone point out a fairly recent example of a team that was getting beat physically in their plan A, who then switched their offense to a plan B, resulting in a win? I can’t recall one, but I am sure it haa happened.

    Like

    • Bright Idea

      Bootlegs, rollouts anyone?

      Like

      • AusDawg85

        Happens a lot when a QB more or less takes a game over. Murray did it as did Eason late in a couple of games last year. Happens in the pros all the time. And the best examples this year is…Miami. That shuts down the conversation with you, but for others here, you can see the “old” Richt dialing up different plays when they’ve had to come from behind, and his dismantling of ND’s defense last week was a thing of beauty to observe.

        I don’t think they let Fromm use his talent last week. Stuck in the pocket and getting pressured is not a situation he is ready for. They needed to run him, move him, get the ball to the perimeter and slow down those DE’s. Chaney has done this in other games, so it’s not that he doesn’t know this, it’s why he felt it would not work. He’s paid a lot to know better than us, so I’d like to hear his thoughts.

        Like

        • Macallanlover

          I don’t think he has let Fromm loose all season. I understand that in Games 1 & 2, but starting with the Samford game we should have shown we could do more than just run it down someone’s throat. Sure we were winning, but we made it look like all you had to do was stop our run. Well, we led Auburn to that alley and they showed they could shut it down. I would rather a DC feel he had to split the baby and defend it all.

          We all felt we had some secret plan we were hiding, turns out Chaney isn’t that wise and had no plan. Just because we slammed people with a GT type run game, doesn’t mean we should haven’t have been working on a complete offense with more balance…and less run up the middle then throw when everyone knows you have to throw.

          Like

        • QB’s take over games when they get protection and receivers get separation. I’m talking about a change in the schematic.

          Like

      • Greg

        There have been plenty thru the years, but the first that comes to mind is the Purdue/Georgia bowl game in 2000. Drew Brees and Purdue jump out to a 25-0 halftime lead. Donnan adjusts, he sits Kevin “Cool Breeze” Ramsey’s azz down and puts Kines in charge of the D’. Purdue scores no more after half, Georgia wins.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Jeff Sanchez

    Dang. Not sure who Auburn’s DC is, but apparently he’s a 4-D genius who can draw up a D for which there is NO counter.

    Either that, or CKS is covering for an OC who has NO plan B if the run is not working

    Like

    • atlasshrugged55

      That’s not covering for an OC, that’s a subtle way of deflecting criticism onto the OC. The OC has to come up w/ a game plan for the head coach to approve or tweak. If the head coach wants something different (screens/slants/passes to TE’s) he makes it well known to the OC & it’s included.

      There is no plan B just like all of last season. We had superior talent the first nine games & things were working. Not so in game 10.

      The reason we have the current OC may be that he was the only OC willing to work w/in the parameters Kirby dictates. Possibly, other candidates wanted more autonomy & were told that wasn’t going to happen. I don’t know or have any insight, just how it appears to me.

      Like

      • We have the current OC because he could bring Kirby the OL coach he wanted … nothing more, nothing less.

        Like

        • atlasshrugged55

          Seems you’d want the best possible OC versus settling for a very average OC just to get a top-shelf OL coach. If memory serves, the track record of these two together hasn’t produced any rings before.

          Can’t wait to see the offense bunch-up & run up the middle countless times Saturday.

          Like

        • 1smartdude

          And because they were in a rush for an OC. Let’s not forget the prize of that recruiting class was Eason. He’d more or less opened his recruitment back up and was talking to other teams with only a short period of time before he wanted to show up on campus. They needed an OC that could satisfy him and dad, and they needed him quickly. As good of a defensive mind as Kirby is, he needed a top flight OC to help him on that side of the ball. While I’m sure Cheney gets a direction from Kirby, the intricacies of his direction naturaly would fall on the OC with a defensive minded head coach in his first gig. It was a bad hire from the get go. I said so then and believe it now. Until that gets corrected, while we’ll be fine in wth the East, we’ll struggle against the elite teams in the West and Nationally, in my opinion.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Cojones

            Weren’t you considering that ND was a national power before this last weekend? National pundits had them as our wind to our sails. How about MSU after they trashed LSU and gave ‘Bama a run for it until the last 25 secs of their game last weekend? Certainly you thought that SC was more powerful than those two. Face-plant didn’t happen during FU game and saved itself until Auburn game, okay?

            You have provided my opinion of last year’s team and, because of one inexplicable loss and the fact they didn’t conveniently use our fan’s scheme to win or go away from a plan, have returned to last year’s team no matter that we consumed the porn and agreed with their methods and schemes before the loss. That reasoning neither explains nor implies an answer.

            Don’t know about the rest of you, but me and mine will soldier on with this team and hope they solve the mystery that affects them psychologically more than it does us. All that we can do is support them for the rest of this year’s journey and let them know that, although we are grieved, it doesn’t approach their feelings as a team and we will remain here to cheer them onward without deciding they should win a game before it is played.

            Liked by 1 person

        • Aubrey E Walker

          We have our present OC because he couldn’t get his first choice. Should have been on the job sooner

          Like

      • Greg

        It is looking more and more that way……LAWD, I hope not though. Cause we will be in for a LONG ride. “Superior talent” will only get you so far. I think it was Michel being interviewed at the end of the game and someone asked him about the game plan…..he said he did not know what the game plan was. …had to shake my head.

        Like

        • 1smartdude

          That was painful to hear. If you don’t know what the game plan is, as senator mentioned, is there any hope of knowing what plan B might be?

          Like

        • atlasshrugged55

          I guess we shouldn’t be surprised since members of the Athletic Board admitted not knowing the strategic plan (or mission) of the UGAA. It’s The Georgia Way.

          Like

        • I have a feeling Sony may not be available to the media much after that comment.

          Like

          • paul

            Never the less, if he’s telling the truth and not simply venting about what just happened, then that’s a very fundamental failure on the part of the coaching staff. The sort of failure that shouldn’t be happening at the conclusion of your second year as a staff. If all they’re telling the players is “run the plays we call” there’s a whole lot that ain’t right. What exactly are they talking about in the film room or on the practice field? As Bush would say, what about strategery?

            Like

        • ugafidelis

          The game plan was to win Sony didn’t come back because he thinks the coaching staff are idiots. Nick didn’t say “Everybody’s bought in” because he thinks the coaching staff are idiots.

          You can have plans A,B,C,&D, but if you can’t execute better than the other guys; ain’t nothing going to work.

          Like

    • Aubrey E Walker

      Jeff it’s not the other DC it our head coach having to run the overall program. He had to control the offense the Defense and the Special teams. That’s the only reason that the OV we have now is here he agreed to let CKS call and approve every aspect of the offense. And has been willing thrown under the bus. Has anyone gave ant thought as to why only CKS talks and no one else. That way none of the actual truth comes out. We get what ADGM wants.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. When all else fails, blame execution.

    I️ get you want to be who you are. We’re a run first team to set up the passing game. When that doesn’t work, you have to find a Plan B.

    Regarding the screen game comment, that’s a bunch of BS. Our screen game has been devastating in the past with teams that have had to key on tailbacks.

    Liked by 2 people

    • We have a true freshman QB, guys. This is why I was one who was slow to anoint Fromm as the next Joe Montana this year. The coaches don’t want to have to rely on a green QB, no matter how many intangibles he has or how much “it” oozes from his pores. He’s still a freshman. Should we have run some screens last week? Absolutely. We should have run them all year. Against UF, UT, Miss St, etc… but we didn’t, and while running over teams is awesome, we looked like a team that didn’t know how to play without a running game because we’ve never had to be one.

      That’s why I think a lot of fans were nervous/worried about this offense against a great defense. You can’t line up and run at AUB (or Bama… Or Georgia) and win. You have to be able to stretch all 11 players on defense.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I️ said from the beginning that this team needed Eason to take a step forward to be a championship contender rather than rely on another true freshman QB … at least, Jeff “Brown Noser” Dantzler won’t be able to say this year will be another throwaway season with a straight face. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

        • Snoop Dawgy Dawg

          When the message boards were littered with “who should start” discussions, my preference for Eason was based on the hope that he had advanced and was the quarterback we needed. For the same things you two mentioned, you can’t run the ball, only, at Auburn, Bama, Miami, Clemson, Ohio St and win. You have to be able to stretch and punish the defense for over committing.

          We showed saturday that we’re not that team, at least we weren’t that day. Hopefully we will be that team this week, next week, the following week, and then twice in january.

          Like

        • By the way, I️ love Fromm. He’s going to be a damn good QB if we can get him someone who can coach him up. I️ still think he was going to be a better player as a 5th year senior rather than as a true freshman (I’m not questioning the decision to send him into the App State game or to continue to play him after Eason’s return). Just stating the facts.

          Like

      • paul

        Well, not to pick at scabs here but you can line it up and run at Georgia. Auburn just did. A lot of us have been saying all along that simply working on the passing game in practice isn’t enough. You have to do it in games. It doesn’t matter if we don’t “need” to pass to win. We need to pass in games in order to develop our offense. Personally, I thought we would use Eason in a situation like we encountered last Saturday but obviously I was wrong. Just like last year, when Kirby was more interested in long term strategy than winning now, he clearly wanted Fromm to learn from the experience. I sure hope the next freshman quarterback we have coming in is as good as we think he is because Eason isn’t likely to let the door hit him in the butt on the way out.

        Liked by 2 people

  5. And this is my concern. A life long defensive guy, turned HC, who basically turns the offensive side over to his OC. The Auburn D wasn’t studying the got damn running backs when we were in 3rd and long, which was most of the game. Wtf is Kirby talking about??

    Why the hell were we running the ball when we had no timeouts and seconds left on the clock? Why were we running our 5th string running back when we were down and needing to pass? Why was our OC calling plays like we were still kicking ass?? Impose our will made Chaney and this offense look bad when we couldn’t impose our will. So we run the same offense when winning, down by 3 or down by 30. Seems like a winning strategy.

    Lets face it, we all get lulled to sleep by our gaudy stats against bad teams. So much so that all we talked about was Fromm and this offense’s stats. We never addressd the offensive questions that kept looming. Every time someone brought up needing to work on the passing game we got told but look at the stats. People starting lauding the OL in articles and I had a feeling that was a bad sign. We’ve gone most of the year using our TEs as run blockers and extra help for our OL, yet, we send them out in passing routes all throughout the Auburn game. Wtf?? Why wait until we face the toughest defense to try and open up the offense? I think Chaney has a good offense and plays but he seems to only have one plan and he seems to lose the feel for games.

    Anyway, I believe Kirby has the right idea but it’s not gonna work out if he has this team peaking the 3rd game of the season. It’s not gonna work out if he’s gonna fully entrust his offense to his OC, yet fail to see the glaring issues present or where said OC is lacking. Being stubborn is great…to a point.

    One of my biggest concerns is who is coaching the QBs. I’ll chalk these first years up to being freshman starters but the same bad tendencies I see out of Fromm were present in Eason. The shit the Florida and South Carolina and Missouri players said that got everyone bent out of shape were the truth! Lol!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Your QB coach is none other than … Jim Chaney.

      Like

      • Derek Dooley 2.0?

        Serous question. How much longer do you think Chaney will be in Athens? And is Pittman respected because of his coaching (zero adjustment on the OL on the Plains) or his recruiting?

        Like

        • 1) I think Chaney gets 1 more year to give Kirby the offense he wants. Whether he can do that or not remains to be seen. I’m not and haven’t been a fan.
          2) I’m willing to give Pittman the benefit of the doubt. We were really concerned about the o-line this year, and they have exceeded my expectations especially given another true freshman QB and the challenges. In particular, the work he has done with Galliard at center has impressed the heck out of me. His recruiting has been top notch.

          Like

  6. I think we need a dose of reality. If at the beginning of the year, I told y’all we’d finish this season SEC East Champs, 11-2 and Eason would start only 1 game, would you have died from delight?

    We’re only frustrated because this team is ahead of schedule. We don’t have the O-Line to really compete yet. They need another recruiting class or, more realistically – two.

    Let’s be grateful for what we got. A talented team that managed to out perform expectations and make us hungry for more.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jared S.

      All good points.

      But I don’t think your reply necessarily means we don’t have a right to complain about looking like a clearly and woefully inferior team against Auburn. We have a right to recognize a potential for greatness hampered by poor clock management, focus, discipline, stubborn play-calling, etc.

      But back to your point, I totally agree. I am delighted that we are where we are and consider us ahead of schedule. I thought we might get 10 regular season wins this year, but thought 9 would be okay – with losses coming from any three of ND, UT, UF, Auburn, or even Miss State.

      Of course, I didn’t factor in that UT and UF would BOTH implode spectacularly (even GLORIOUSLY)….So, now we really SHOULD finish 11-1 now. There is no good reason why we should lose to either Kentucky or Tech.

      Where are we as fans? Truly expecting UGA to go 11-1 as East Champs in Kirby’s second year, and knowing we get a chance to play one of two Top 6 teams in the SECCG, with a clear chance of making the CFP.

      And that makes me happy.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Scorpio Jones, III

      If I may, the team is about where it should be, the early wins and rat poison convinced some of us it was ahead of schedule. All them folks who want to be “in the conversation” well we in the conversation…just two years earlier than we should have been.

      And believe me, I have enjoyed the run, but I am worried about Kentucky and Tech.

      Like

      • Cojones

        I’d be glad to loan you my UGA ski cap for that cold outside weather you may sit in beginning this Sat. Just give the word to Bluto to get in touch and it will arrive UPS or FedEx tomorrow. Us hat people need to care for each other during hard times.

        P.S. – Please don’t twist it harshly during or after the game because the wool isn’t as fiber memory-pliant as others that I own. If you think there is a question as to controlling those feelings, I have an Inuit Indian (Eskimo) woolen cap straight out of the Arctic for you. It isn’t fancy and has no logo, but it is warm and made by Native North Americans.

        Like

        • Scorpio Jones, III

          Thanks, Cojo, for your kind offer, but I got a hat, a real good hat, its just a couple of good recruiting years away from being able to be a Championship Hat. My hat was as confused as some others about the early season success, but we shoulda known Notre Dame is just another big, slow mid-west team.

          Thanks again.

          Like

          • Got Cowdog

            I have one that I travel with, been to Europe, Hawaii, all over the continental US. Won some money playing golf while wearing it. Baseball cap, faded red, almost white in spots with bleaching from sun and sweat. It is soft enough now that it doesn’t hurt the screen when I throw it at Gary Danielson. Or an official. Or Gus Mahlzahn. Or my new spaniel when she hides behind the chair and squats to pee.
            Love that hat but it didn’t have quite enough juju in it for awbun. Maybe next time.

            Like

  7. Run run pass
    Run run pass
    Down by 3 TDs? run run pass
    Down by 4 tds? Pass on 1st

    Go back and watch the replay. Chaney’s situational play calling was sickening!

    Like

  8. Aladawg

    When we were blowing out all this opponents we could have been working some of these things and allowing both our QB’s to grow, throwing the ball. We chose to road grade and run clock unlike Mahlzahn who threw with 40 seconds left. Now we are destined to lose a pro prospect QB to the west coast and restart with a sophomore and true freshman next fall. We will also have to replace Trenton, Atkins, Carter, Bellamy, Roquan, Davis, Sanders, R. carter, Wynn, Sony, Chubb et. Al. This year with a weak East is our real chance still. Kirby’s job rating will be based on how we finish not how we started. He better be a bit more creative and figure it out. Yeah we tackled poorly but the tackling stats don’t match what he said yesterday about tackling being poor all year long. I guess he’s trying to motivate.

    Like

  9. Greg

    This made more sense to me:

    To generate offense against Auburn requires dropping back and making the linebackers worry about covering routes in the middle or attacking the cornerbacks down the sidelines, when they’re isolated by coverages that involve the safeties in the run game. : Ian Boyd

    The linebackers were not fooled in our offensive set, easier to go to the ball and read your keys when we are in the shotgun….live by the sword, die by the sword. Underneath center, when the QB drops…the backers drop. When the qb rolls, the lb’s roll…..loosening up the middle giving the offense more room to operate.

    I would have at least liked to have seen a changeup, cause nothing else was working.

    Like

  10. DvilDawg

    How many of those 20 RB receptions have gone to Swift? I get that he may be our best receiving back, but Sony and Nick have made big catches in the past and are more than capable. At this point in the season, there is enough film to show those tendencies, and the plainstigles were clearly paying special attention to Swift when he went on a route, expecting him to get the ball. Even the announcer mentioned that.

    Like

  11. Basically, Auburn exposed everything some of us have noticed most of the year. Great running game but the OL struggled on obvious running downs many times this season. The secondary didn’t get tested a lot but got torched often when it did. Our pass rush disappeared after UT. In fact, I started noticing a change after UT. We never really team tackled like we did at ND and UT.

    Obviously, much of the was affected by the level of competition but, looking back, it seems like we weren’t the same after UT. The lack of gang tackling after that point of the season hasn’t gone unnoticed.

    Like

  12. WarD Eagle

    A note on making adjustments at half time. All those coaches, “quality control” guys, players, etc spend hours watching film to even start the game plan.

    Aftwerward, they choose what alignments will work best against the upcoming opponent’s defense, then they choose the plays and re-jigger the alignments (not the formation) but literally how a lineman might line up slightly toward a gap, or read the opposing lineman and play differently.

    Then they narrow down the plays they think will work, and start installing the game plan at practice.

    This process occurs over a course of days during the week leading up to Saturday. So, the idea that you can draw up a “you’re the bottle cap, you’re the stick, you cut in at the second magnolia tree…” type of whiteboard play on the fly is purt’ near impossible.

    The adjustments that are made are individual issues, “when they X, watch out for Y” or the ever-annoying “execute better”.

    All that to say, it isn’t as simple as we’re going to call a bunch of screens, slants, what have you.

    In the case of this game, Fromm was absolutely terrific in staying in the pocket and taking shots while looking for a receiver. Especially given how little time he had. Coaches recognize that it takes time to set up a screen and he just didn’t have that time this game.

    If AU is lucky enough to see UGA in the SECCG, UGA will have an advantage that AU has shown their hand, so to speak, because they will be expected to repeat the alignments, etc that worked. Conversely, UGA really hasn’t shown their hand because you know they’re going to make a number of adjustments. Also, I doubt the muffed punt*, fumble, and dumb personal fouls will show up in the SECCG.

    *muffed punt or not, #4 was definitely the players of the game for UGA. That guy is fun to watch.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Scorpio Jones, III

      “Coaches recognize that it takes time to set up a screen and he just didn’t have that time this game.”

      Damn, Ward…is there a data point for that.

      And, thanks.

      Like

      • WarD Eagle

        Good question. That’s a seat of the pants assessment from watching the game once. I could very well be wrong.

        But, if you think of how a quickly running play sets up – snap, turn, exchange, into the line; or a downfield pass play – snap, drop, first receiver, throw/step up/2nd receiver; they both happen quickly.

        A WR (tunnel, bubble, flanker, split) screen typically sets up with a play action with the exact same run blocking, so the D is coming hard and the DB/DE are already moving toward the receiver. Considering how well the defensive rush was working, and AU playing press man, there would be little time or freedom for that play to develop or be successful. Maybe the tunnel would have had a chance.

        The base screen wouldn’t have worked again because the DL rush left the LBs free to clean up. Once the OL released, I think Fromm wouldn’t have had time to let it develop. If he did, the LBs would also have time to cover.

        All that said, if AU is lucky enough to get their, I think UGA will have some answers for that aggressive 4-man rush.

        Like

        • This is what happens when a tunnel screen is executed correctly … it doesn’t take long. Dial up to 1:15.

          Like

          • WarD Eagle

            My wife laughs because to this day tunnel screens make me clench my whole body. Even if you know the keys and are expecting it, a tunnel screen is hard to defend. The pass is usually completed. At that point the defenders are saying, “get him get him get him” and no one can relax until you’ve got him.

            It’s a scary play to defend.

            Like

            • Greg

              or screaming …”SCREEN, SCREEN” beforehand when the play is identified. There can be some head cracking going on, on the play. It can hurt, especially for backers and DB’s when some of those big azz linemen release. I can’t recall the last time we have called a draw play….oh well, maybe we are saving it.. :>)

              Like

            • I bet even Jake Fromm completed one or two of those in high school.

              Like

              • The other Doug

                Probably, but I bet plays like the tunnel screen aren’t in his playbook yet. I think that’s why there really isn’t a plan B right now.

                Like

                • I would like to see what’s in the playbook right now. The tunnel screen isn’t a difficult play to run. Take the ball, turn to the WR coming underneath and hit him in stride. It’s quite possibly the easiest throw to make. Every high school running the spread (of which Houston County was one) has the play in their playbook.

                  Like

    • WarD, you’re poor-mouthing, sir. When are you going to make a comment about our long snappah?

      Like

    • Greg

      All true, nice post…..axed before, you Benji, Benji Roland?

      Like

      • WarD Eagle

        Not Benji Roland. But I sure liked that guy.

        Like

        • Greg

          Thanks, he was a good one…..good enough to push ole Rodney Garner to the offensive side of the ball. Wished UGA would have got him (BR), but they were probably too lazy to scout all the way down there in Eastman at the time. Too many misses thru the years down below the gnat line.

          Like

          • WarD Eagle

            It’s funny how often AU & UGA missed small school players, especially in the nether regions of both states.

            Like

            • Greg

              Yeah, I know quite a few good ones that got away. It always seemed to me that Auburn, FSU, Southern Miss and a few others were there to pick them up. But I am going back to the 80’s and 90’s and probably even before then. It is not so much that way now…one thing Kirby can do, he recruits his azz off.

              Like

    • atlasshrugged55

      I’m not so sure we would make adjustments. Kirby will just impose his will mentally on Gus & the victory will belong to the Dawgs.

      You can’t defeat our “will” twice.

      Like

    • Good post. This “plan A didn’t work, switch to plan B” crap everybody keeps spewing is about the dumbest shit I have witnessed on this message board in a long time.

      Like

    • paul

      “So, the idea that you can draw up a “you’re the bottle cap, you’re the stick, you cut in at the second magnolia tree…” type of whiteboard play on the fly is purt’ near impossible.” I understand your point but I don’t necessarily agree. Over the course of a lifetime watching football we’ve all seen coaches who are known to be particularly skilled in-game or sideline coaches, however you would like to label them. They see what’s happening on the field and respond accordingly in real time, altering the game plan if necessary. It’s difficult and a lot of coaches cannot do it. Others are very good at making adjustments during the half. Up until the Auburn game, Kirby and his staff appeared to be capable of making necessary adjustments at halftime. But we didn’t even see that Saturday. What we saw was a head coach who was unable to explain his play calling just before the half in any sort of coherent manner. Then we came back out on the field in the third quarter and proceeded to endlessly repeat precisely the same things that weren’t working before. So I guess my point is, the Kentucky game isn’t simply about the players bouncing back, it’s also about the coaches. Their execution was just as sloppy as the players.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yep – the best at it on offense was the OBS.

        Like

      • illini84

        “a head coach who was unable to explain his play calling just before the half ” Explain to who? What a crock of bullshit.

        Like

        • paul

          Did you watch the game? The sideline reporter stuck a microphone in his face on the way to the locker room and asked about the final sequence of plays just before the half. You know, the plays where we had the ball with some time but no timeouts, ran one play into a brick wall, spiked the ball and then went for a long field goal. His explanation was essentially incoherent. That’s when I knew we were totally screwed. His team had been punched in the mouth and he had no idea how to respond.

          Like

      • WarD Eagle

        I agree there are adjustments. My long-winded (likely obfuscated) point is they typically aren’t going to add new plays.

        Especially with a reasonably young line and QB who are under quite a bit of duress.

        And I want to say to that, the OL is 1-2 years away and Fromm did a heckuva job standing in there and playing football. Another year with this OL together and with Fromm “seeing” who’s going to be where without having to look is going to make a huge difference.

        Even if UGA doesn’t win another game, this season is a huge success.

        Like

    • AusDawg85

      Fromm was terrific staying in the pocket…and getting crushed. Should have used his wheels more with RPO, draws and rolling pocket. Already in the playbook. I agree that his one-note cry for screen passes is a bit off, but this was exactly the time we needed to see if Jake could carry the load. I think it was Kirby who held him back, playing the long game. We did not have to win this game and vanilla is all he wanted to show once he realized our OL was overwhelmed. The mistakes is what hurt our D. I think a rematch looks not much different, but we should have fewer mistakes and we’ll throw a few offensive wrinkles in to let Fromm cut loose.

      Like

  13. Jared S.

    I think Kirby is talking out of his behind and just making excuses for being scared.

    I think he and OCJC were playing conservative, thinking it would be a low scoring game. That our D was going to keep it close, and they were scared to death of turning the ball over, so they stayed with a run-heavy plan.

    That, after his talk about wanting to hunt.

    Okay.

    If I were a reporter, I’d ask him about hunting and tell him when I think of hunting in football, I think more of Miami’s performance against ND and not UGA against Auburn.

    Yeah, I said it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • WarD Eagle

      You gotta give Kirby some slack here. UGA had marched down the field and put a TD on the board. Then they were holding AU to field goals.

      That’s a recipe for success.

      Generally, a lot of things were working. Of course in the game between teams with this level of individual talent they are going to be some stops and some big plays, and a lot of really good defense. I between.

      What Kirby couldn’t foresee was AU’s offense throwing up those kind of numbers, some key penalties, and to really important turnovers.

      As a sidenote, I Kirby speak at halftime and post game. I’m a big fan and I think he will do (has done) well.

      Like

      • Got Cowdog

        WarD, I have to change my stance. I no longer hate all things Auburn. I find your posts to be well thought out, rational, and gracious in both victory and defeat. Thank you.
        Now, that asshole QB you used to have, and your mouthy-ass coach, that’s a different story. 🙂

        Like

        • WarD Eagle

          LOL. Newton and Tuberville?

          I’ll give them both the benefit, this is entertainment (even though we treat it like religion).

          Seriously, I think Gus deserves a break. He’s a good dude. That comment was to an Auburn person and happened to be caught on camera. He never would say something like that with the intention of belittling UGA.

          Like

      • Jared S.

        I also think Kirby has done and will do well.

        Just think he was scared of Auburn. And he was right to be, evidently. So maybe I shouldn’t be faulting him for that. =D

        Like

  14. southernlawyer11

    “I’m pronating….I’m clearing too early…….I’m clearing too late. My God ! My swing feels like an unfolded lawn chair.”

    This is Tin Cup quote is how I feel about our passing game….not rhythmic. Receivers bumped at the line, a QB under pressure. When our offense looks bad, it looks like a bad high school offense from 1993.

    Like

  15. The good Senator writes;

    “That being said, there is a certain amount of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” to Kirby’s attitude on the matter and I can’t exactly fault him for that.”

    I know I will be accused of bias by pointing this out, but that comment about Kirby sound so much like a Will Muschamp comment, it is eerie.

    Liked by 1 person

    • DawgFlan

      “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” – said every organization ever that woke up with the realization they had been left in the dust of others who kept changing and improving.

      I wasn’t thinking Will Muschamp, and I know those are the Senator’s words and not Smart’s, but it is weird that Smart studied/lived in the Saban/Belichik “continual improvement” hive for so long but seems to be making excuses for not being agressive on offense.

      Our WRs may not be blocking like Hines Ward, but they are not hot garbage, and have consistently shown they can hold blocks long enough to at least attempt a screen or throw to an RB/TE in the flats.

      And while I get the “read half the field, throw to the sideline” strategy to protect our FR QB, it sure seems like Nauta was able to get consistently open and make tough catches over the middle last year, and that was with a worse OL, and a FR QB that some think is not any better than Fromm this year. He had 29 receptions last year, and has 7 so far this year. Eason was able to use the middle of the field without becoming a turnover machine. What gives?

      Like

  16. sUGArdaddy

    Saban said after the SECCG in 2012 that the reason Bama went ground and pound in the 2nd half was that that simply couldn’t block Jarvis Jones. He was eating their lunch and killing McCarron, Had we been able to stop the run, we’d have won the game.

    Sometimes, you just can’t block ’em, guys. I watched Houston beat the Heisman winner last year because the Louisville line couldn’t block that cat from Houston.

    Chaney has been masterful this year in coaching Fromm up, having a great game plan and scoring points. We dialed up 1st down throw after 1st down throw vs. Miss. St. He dialed a dropped TD vs. ND and another vs. Auburn.

    We are ranked 29th nationally in scoring offense, 4th in the SEC behind Bama, Mizzou and Auburn. We’re the only ones w/ a true freshman QB.

    Kirby Smart told you the story in the postgame: we lost the game on the line of scrimmage. The missed opportunities (missed FG, dropped/poorly thrown TD) and dumb penalties made the margin what it was. We played bad and did stupid stuff.

    It’s not some kind of indictment. This team has done what no other UGA team has done in the way they’ve beaten teams, and we have a chance to go unbeaten in the East for the first time EVER on Saturday.

    Football Happens.

    Keep Chopping,.

    Liked by 3 people

    • W Cobb Dawg

      Agree. We’re in the sec championship and have a great chance to finish the regular season 11-1. It took awbie’s best effort and our worst effort to result in a loss.

      In the bigger scheme of things, we have a chance to be sec champs, go to the playoffs, and maybe win a national championship. At the very least we go to a top bowl game – no Liberty or Gator bowl! We’re closing in on a top 3 recruiting class. We’re a legit top 5 program heading into 2018.

      Like

  17. PTC DAWG

    WE got beat..we can either deal with it or not. When you make the mistakes we did on the road against a very good team, you will lose.

    Thankfully, we don’t play AU or BAMA at their place the first of Dec.

    Like

  18. Will Trane

    There is a very interesting article today in Saturday Down South by O’Cara.
    Read his considerations re Fromm and Eason.
    This is the direction of my questions about the OC and the passing game.
    O’Cara correctly points out the 6 times Eason brought the Dawgs back via passing.
    All the defenses are different this year.
    Auburn is a cut above.
    Watch that clip from the UT game, and note Eason on that drive. Just watch what he instinctively does on passes.
    Remember that O line does not even come close to this year.
    Tell me what you think about that Senator.

    Like

  19. Biggus Rickus

    I really don’t get all of this soul searching. Georgia played their worst game of the season on a night when Auburn played one of their best. I didn’t think Georgia would play a game that poorly this season, but it happened. Maybe after they handle Kentucky things will calm down a little, and hopefully, they’ll play lights out in Atlanta.

    Like