Daily Archives: November 28, 2017

I keep telling you guys.

When the dust settles…

… don’t be surprised to see Corch to be walking the sideline in one of those semi-final games.

37 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs

Is the lid finally being knocked off?

I’ll just put these Michael Elkon observations out here as food for thought.

Here’s Georgia’s historical SRS chart, if you’re interested.  Michael may have skipped past the ’81 team (turnovers at Clemson, plus Dan Effing Marino ruined what should have been a helluva year), but his overall point is worth debating.

35 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!

Today, in fighting

Here’s a heartwarming story from Tallahassee.

A disturbing story involving Florida State kicker Ricky Aguayo has a Florida connection.

On Tuesday, the Tallahassee Democrat’s Karl Etters reported that Aguayo told police that members of a fraternity on Florida State’s campus beat the player over missed field goals during a game against Florida in 2016.

Per Tallahassee Police records obtained by Etters, Aguayo reported being “jumped” by members of the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity in front of the group’s house after the Seminoles’ 31-13 victory against the Gators. Aguayo missed two of three field-goal tries that day…

The report goes on to mention that police saw blood on Aguayo’s face and a ripped shirt. He declined to press charges, and he refused to pursue medical treatment, according to the report.

Mind you, that was after a win.  Can you imagine what those scamps might have taken upon themselves to do if Aguayo had missed a game-winner?

Meanwhile, we take you to the Georgia Tech locker room, where two players evidently decided to eliminate the middle man.  It happened in the spring, so I’ve got to say I’m impressed they kept it quiet as long as they did.  Then again, maybe they thought nobody would really care.

25 Comments

Filed under ACC Football, General Idiocy

Observations from the 40, Mark Richt Field edition

Georgia still hasn’t lost at Bobby Dodd Stadium in the 21st century.  Some traditions never seem to end.

Let’s jump right into the bullet points, shall we?

  • You could tell shortly before game time that it was going to be another shades of Notre Dame crowd.  Easily 40% of the huddled masses were clothed in red and black.  I assume that means the offense didn’t have problems with communication, and, indeed, we never heard much on the illegal movement front all day.
  • I have no idea what the officials were up to on the opening kickoff.  In the name of player safety, I can actually understand why they might err on the side of caution and rule that the return man’s gesture was a signal for a fair catch.  What I can’t understand is why, if that’s the way you go, how there wasn’t a delay of game penalty called when the returner fielded the kick and took it out of the end zone.
  • That was just the first of a mystifying series of officiating decisions.  In the vast scheme of things, it wound up meaning nothing, but how was that Wims catch not ruled a touchdown?
  • Fromm started off shaky.  He was damned lucky his second attempt wasn’t intercepted.  Once he shook things off, he settled in.  He’s still got a way to go with his reads.  When he looks back at the tape, he’ll see some guys who were wide open.  It’s hard to bitch at a 233 passer rating much, though.  And his last toss of the day, the TD to Crumpton, is one of Fromm’s best throws of the year.
  • I’m not sure why it felt that way, because I know Wims once again led the team in catches, but it felt like Fromm was making more of an effort to spread the wealth.
  • You know what’s fun?  Watching Georgia rub Tech’s face in its depth at running back.  They run this state.  There weren’t a lot of big gains, outside of that one run by Swift, but there was a steady grind that squeezed the life out of Tech’s defense as the game wore on.  Georgia wound up with a slight advantage in time of possession and a big advantage in rushing yards, which is how you know you beat Paul Johnson at his own game.
  • Credit, too, has to go to the offensive line, which handled the Jackets’ front pretty consistently all game and, with the exception of a sack, also held up on the occasional blitz call from Ted Roof.
  • This really wasn’t a game that was won because one staff outcoached the other, scheme-wise, nearly as much as it was about Georgia making sure its superior athletic talent was deployed to keep Tech from doing the things it likes to do.  The best examples of that were a couple of Michel runs where he appeared to be bottled up by defenders who were positioned to make tackles for loss, only to juke his way around and convert a long third down and score a touchdown, respectively.
  • That was on the offensive side, but it was the defense that really took the athletic difference to an entirely different level.  That may have been the best effort I’ve seen a Georgia defense turn in against the triple option.  Outside of some first-half trouble defending the wide pitch and the one screw up on Tech’s touchdown pass, the defense checked every box you’d expect to break down that offense:  stop the dive, contain the edge and don’t lose the wide receivers deep.
  • A lot of defenders played well, but three stood out on the day:  R (I don’t need to explain, do I?), Natrez Patrick and D’Andre Walker.  Patrick’s play was so good, it made you realize why the staff put up with his marijuana transgressions.  Walker turned in the kind of game we’ve always been hoping to see from him, marrying his talent to disrupt the offensive flow with control and discipline.  If this game was an example of him being ready to take his game to the next level, look out next season (and maybe for the rest of this one).
  • Dominick Sanders appears to need a little more time in the weight room, judging from that one reception it took him an extra fifteen yards to bring down the receiver.
  • Special teams were their usual solid self.  At some point, that Hardman touchdown return is coming, right?  Right?
  • My annual observation about the triple option is that for Tech to succeed consistently, it needs a quarterback who can throw the ball just well enough to be a legitimate threat and a great B-back.  This year’s team has neither.
  • Another good game plan from Chaney.  A few new looks, like the first play of the game with a Chubb-Michel backfield, mixed in with the usual stuff.  When the running game is there and Fromm doesn’t need to throw the ball more than in the teens, it’s going to be a good day.  And it was.
  • Meanwhile, Mel Tucker rules, baby.  There have been a ton of comments on it, but that wrinkle with stacking the ILBs was absolutely brilliant (and, again, another reason Patrick’s return was a bigger deal that I thought it might be).  His players were well coached and ready for everything Johnson threw at them.  Adjustments at halftime were effective, to say the least.  The outside toss was shut down and that meant the end of Tech’s success on third downs.
  • Kirby wanted this game, but went about his business of getting his team ready without too much emotion or without being distracted by the looming prospect of the SECCG.  Success on both fronts.  Despite that Tech came out of the gate with its usual chippiness (literally, starting with the opening kickoff), outside of that one personal foul on Ridley, his players kept their cool throughout and maintained focus.  No turnovers, either.  That’s what good teams do.  That’s what good coaches get good teams to do.

All in all, denying Tech a bowl appearance while demonstrating that the gap between the two programs is depressingly wide was the cherry on top of what’s been a very satisfying regular season sundae.  This team has left itself in a position after twelve games to play for everything an élite program expects to play for.  As a Georgia fan, it’s nice to be back in that position.  Well played, gentlemen.

76 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Georgia Tech Football

Musical palate cleanser, young guitar god edition

Jimi Hendrix, were he still alive, would be celebrating his 75th birthday.  Here he is, playing lead guitar on a wild Isley Brothers’ cut, “Testify, parts 1 & 2”.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Finishing the drill

Bill Connelly updated his advanced statistical profile yesterday.  Georgia’s moved to 4th in S&P+ Rk, which is nice, I guess.  What I like more, though, is that the Dawgs notched a 95% performance rating against Georgia Tech.  The main reason I find that pleasing isn’t because it came against the Jackets (not that I’m complaining), but because it indicates another good thing about the coaching job Kirby Smart has done this year.

Last season, you may recall, Georgia stumbled through the last three weeks of the regular season.  The percentile performances steadily declined:  Auburn, 65%; UL-Lafayette, 49%; Georgia Tech, 39%.  The story in 2017 couldn’t be more different.  After the egg laid in Auburn, the Dawgs finished strong and stronger:  Kentucky, 91%; Georgia Tech, 95%.  The performance in the last regular season game was Georgia’s highest of the year.  You can’t ask for anything more from a coaching staff.

That’s one reason I think Georgia stands a decent chance to succeed on Saturday.

37 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!

You had one job to do.

Andy Staples believes that at the heart of the Tennessee hiring fiasco, you’ll find a story about customer service.

College athletics are a lot like the media business. There are end users—the fans and the readers/viewers/listeners—but they aren’t the only customers. We sell you copies of the print edition of Sports Illustrated, but we also sell space in the magazine to advertisers. We give you columns such as this one for free on the web, but we charge advertisers to place their content next to ours so you’ll see it as you read about your favorite team. In a way, the advertisers are like the big-money donors in college athletics. Their opinions often count for more than the opinion of the average reader.

The advertisers and the big donors pay more money, so their voices often carry more weight in our enterprises. But what we in the media and the people who run college sports should realize is this: If we lose the end user, we lose the entire enterprise. When the kid stops running to the mailbox to see who made the cover or when the fan stops buying tickets for that one game a year he saves up to attend, we’re on borrowed time. Sometimes, we need to stop and listen to our rank-and-file customers. Tennessee’s administration learned that Sunday.

It’s a comforting way to look at things, I suppose.  It’s also a little delusional.

Tennessee is reeling now, but it’s not as if the program’s been on solid ground for a while.  When it comes to hiring/firing head coaches, the story in Knoxville since Fulmer was canned (and, remember, that came a year after Mike Hamilton gave him a contract extension) has been one of lather, rinse and repeat.  If the athletic director needed to be sensitive to the wishes of the fan base — and clearly, his is a major fail in that regard — it’s because of how shaky things are there now after three straight regimes have been unable to deliver the success on the field Vol fans believe they’re entitled to.

Let’s get real for a second, though.  If the circumstances were different… if UT had been successful, does anyone really believe the athletic director would face the same kind of pressure from the fan base, its customers, over a hiring decision?  If you really need to think about that, ponder what’s gone on in Athens this year in the wake of Georgia’s success.  As the ticket sales stories for the two biggest games of the season indicate, if there’s one thing Butts-Mehre isn’t wrapping itself in these days, it’s customer concern.

But I digress.  The reality of the situation in Urnge Land is that Currie should have known he was dealing with a restless fan base.  If nothing else, the continued delusion by many Vol fans over the ludicrous chance that Gruden might accept becoming the next head coach should have been an indication that things weren’t exactly normal.  That’s on him, as Staples explains.

It’s also something Tennessee athletic director John Currie should have considered as he was zeroing in on Schiano. The vetting process is supposed to bring every potential land mine into view before a school gets too far down the road with a candidate. When a candidate is potentially controversial, a school will often leak that it is considering that candidate as a trial balloon. Had Currie floated such a balloon in the past few days, Tennessee’s fan base would have reacted in similar fashion. The difference is the sides wouldn’t already have a Memorandum of Understanding. The Vols could have moved on to another candidate without a full-on revolt that will wind up making the search even more difficult going forward.

Water under the proverbial bridge now, though.  And that leads us to a place where Staples is off.

Another issue Sunday was what appeared to be an effort by some of the most influential voices in college football’s media corps to tell Tennessee fans to shut up and accept the hire. Whether this was because those people believe Schiano to be a great coach or because they want to stay on the good side of agent Jimmy Sexton is irrelevant. It came off as people in our business talking down to our customers who already had made their decision on the issue. We do that often. I’m just as guilty of this as anyone, and Sunday’s events should make all of us step back and consider listening to our customers a little more.

But here’s the tough part for us and the even tougher part for Currie. Every individual voice isn’t correct. When a consumer bloc rises up the way it did Sunday, it’s fairly easy to determine that the best move for the future of the business is to give the people what they want.

Welp, I’m hardly an influential voice, but it seems to me that there are valid reasons to react negatively to what happened that have nothing whatsoever to do with Schiano or Sexton.  (I say this with my neutral observer hat on, of course.  As a Georgia partisan, I couldn’t be more thrilled with what’s gone down in Knoxville.)

To start with, to describe this as a revolt of a consumer bloc is stretching things.  Sure, there was a chunk of the fan base that was extremely worked up over the possibility of the Schiano hire, but that doesn’t extend to Clay Travis’ attention whoring.  Nor does it cover the playing to the crowd group of politicians who smelled an opportunity to grandstand without any downside.  Ed Kilgore goes so far as to wonder if a standard has been set:

Well, if Schiano wasn’t a household name in the state of Tennessee before, he certainly is now, and not in a good way. Vol fans are now coming to grips with the power they exercised over an athletics Establishment that probably figured some lost season ticket sales were the worst they might fear in choosing whoever they wanted. And politicians in Tennessee must think about the precedent they set in intervening instantly with respect to a proposed college-football coaching position. You could definitely see ambitious political underdogs throughout the South trying to get attention and votes by pushing for or against coaching hires, particularly with jobs coming open this year all over the region. Voters may need to know their positions on taxes, education, economic development, and football.

There is a certain “Okay, Smokey, you caught the car you were chasing, now what?” aspect to this circus that I don’t think everyone grasped in the immediate moment.  I bet, though, as news like this greets the Vol faithful, that will start to sink in.

So much for uniting the fan base.  Who’s next?  Tee Martin, who’s never been a head coach?  Jim Bob Cooter, who, name aside, doesn’t have a head coaching resume, either?  What coach in his right mind (i.e., not a Tennessee man) is going to be willing to walk into a shitstorm like this without the insulation of a huge contract, which means the school is likely to overpay to the nth degree?  (Cry not for Jimmy Sexton, folks, he’ll be just fine.)

Don’t get me wrong here.  John Currie managed to screw up the one thing I didn’t think it was possible to screw up — replace Booch with someone more attractive.  He deserves everything coming his way.  But, man, giving into the social media mob as a business plan doesn’t seem to have much of a future.

91 Comments

Filed under Because Nothing Sucks Like A Big Orange