“Loan to Players.”

This isn’t good.

Documents and bank records obtained in discovery during the federal investigation into the underbelly of college basketball detail in meticulous fashion the expenditures of prominent former NBA agent Andy Miller, his former associate Christian Dawkins and his agency, ASM Sports, including expense reports and balance sheets that list cash advances, as well as entertainment and travel expenses for high school and college prospects and their families.

Yahoo Sports viewed hundreds of pages of documents from the years-long probe that had federal authorities monitoring multiple targets and intercepting more than 4,000 calls across 330 days, providing a clear-eyed view into the pervasive nature of the game’s underground economy.

While three criminal cases tied to the investigation may take years to play out, the documents viewed by Yahoo revealed the extent of the potential NCAA ramifications from the case. The documents show an underground recruiting operation that could create NCAA rules issues – both current and retroactive – for at least 20 Division I basketball programs and more than 25 players.

The documents tie some of the biggest names and programs in the sport to activity that appears to violate the NCAA’s amateurism rules. This could end up casting a pall over the NCAA tournament because of eligibility issues. (NCAA officials declined a request for comment.) There’s potential impermissible benefits and preferential treatment for players and families of players at Duke, North Carolina, Texas, Kentucky, Michigan State, USC, Alabama and a host of other schools. The documents link some of the sport’s biggest current stars – Michigan State’s Miles Bridges, Alabama’s Collin Sexton and Duke’s Wendell Carter – to specific potential extra benefits for either the athletes or their family members. The amounts tied to all of the players in the case range from basic meals to tens of thousands of dollars.

This is what happens when you forget Bagman’s First Rule:  always pay cash and never keep records.

I’m still not convinced this will ever gain enough traction to merit criminal convictions, but as far as NCAA recruiting violations go, yeah, I can imagine there are more than a few people shitting bricks today.  Maybe this will wind up being the straw that breaks the amateur camel’s back.

**************************************************************************

UPDATE:  Guess who wants you to think he’s on the mother?

“These allegations, if true, point to systematic failures that must be fixed and fixed now if we want college sports in America. Simply put, people who engage in this kind of behavior have no place in college sports. They are an affront to all those who play by the rules. Following the Southern District of New York’s indictments last year, the NCAA Board of Governors and I formed the independent Commission on College Basketball, chaired by Condoleezza Rice, to provide recommendations on how to clean up the sport. With these latest allegations, it’s clear this work is more important now than ever. The Board and I are completely committed to making transformational changes to the game and ensuring all involved in college basketball do so with integrity. We also will continue to cooperate with the efforts of federal prosecutors to identify and punish the unscrupulous parties seeking to exploit the system through criminal acts.”

— NCAA President Mark Emmert

Rest easy, America.  Help is on the way.

**************************************************************************

UPDATE #2:  This.

39 Comments

Filed under The NCAA

39 responses to ““Loan to Players.”

  1. 3rdandGrantham

    If I recall, the NCAA makes more money in TV revenue and sponsorship for March Madness alone than college football. I mean, they even have an official ladder sponsor of the tournament, which they use to cut down the nets.

    With literally billions on the line, there is a 0.0% chance the NCAA bans blue blood schools like Duke and UNC, regardless of what the FBI uncovers. Slaps on the wrist all-around, with a few stern statements from Emmert and co., and that will be it.

    Like

  2. JasonC

    If only they had consulted Cam’s dad.

    Like

  3. Bigshot

    Nothing will happen. The NCAA will screw up the case.

    Like

  4. ASEF

    NCAA dropping a hammer on players who are already in the NBA? Ok

    NCAA dropping a hammer on record books because wildly talented kids were being compensated for their talents? Ok

    The media loves these NCAA “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” stories. The 1 and Done factories, however, are probably sweating profusely right now.

    Like

  5. Borodawg

    It appears ASM spent over $130,000 on 4 players that did not sign with the company.

    Like

  6. paul

    Read: “The Board and I are completely committed to protecting our cash cow.”

    Like

  7. lakedawg

    Understand Aubarn of all people are sweating it particularly the BB coach who has been fired elsewhere for shady dealings.

    Like

    • 69Dawg

      Auburn’s going to Auburn but you would think the football side would have at least counseled with the basketball side the Art of the Deal.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Bulldog Joe

      Auburn has their bases covered within the NCAA infractions committee.

      They already sacrificed Chuck Person to the FBI, so I doubt they are sweating anything.

      Like

  8. AD McGarity will apologized to NCAA for Luke’s violations.

    Like

  9. PTC DAWG

    Excellent point about CASH…

    Like

  10. 69Dawg

    “if true” we call these weasel words. To hear the NCAA President utter them is to hear, “nothing to see here, move along”. They will not act against the schools until after March Madness this year and hope like hell it will go away.

    Like

  11. Tronan

    Others here have said it and I will say it, too: Pay the kids and pay them above board. Enough of the “amateurism” hypocrisy that results in clandestine arrangements that benefit illegitimate, slimy third-parties. Bring in legitimate, slimy third-parties as agents and give the people who we pay to see play get something to put in their wallets.

    I suspect, if it does anything, the NCAA will penalize current players while leaving the existing system in place.

    Like

  12. AusDawg85

    “Commission a study…” That always fixes things in a timely manner.

    Like

  13. Clearly, none of these idiots watched the Wire.

    …”Is you taking notes on a criminal fucking conspiracy?” – Stringer Bell

    Like

  14. ASEF

    If it is just agents behaving badly, then the NCAA will have their out.

    Like

  15. steve

    For a guy who is about to have butt cream applied with the prongs of a soil analyzer Bruce Pearl sure sounds cocky.
    http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2018/02/bruce_pearl_to_gus_malzahn_aft.html

    Like

  16. Don’t we have better things to do with OUR FBI at the moment ? Pretty sure lying to a FISA court, among other things, is far worse than amateur coaches and players getting a few kickbacks. As is whatever incompetence led to zero measures being taken towards the florida shooter despite possessing enough information to do….something. Anything.

    Like

    • Napoleon BonerFart

      I think a Congressional committee should look into FBI short comings and issue a sternly written memo. Next year.

      Like

    • Lying to a FISA court? LMAO.

      Like

      • Tony Barnhart- Mr! CFB

        we shall see. Like most things the truth is usually somewhere in the middle, which is usually pretty far from LMAO territory.

        Like

        • I have no idea what this means, but if you honestly believe several high-ranking government officials deliberately lied under oath to get a court to issue a FISA warrant, I think I’m entitled to laugh.

          What exactly are you basing your insight on?

          Like

          • “High – ranking government officials ” would not lie to get what they want? Now I’m gonna LMAO.

            Like

            • So… nothing concrete, then.

              Like

              • I’m not arguing either side. I certainly don’t have any concrete evidence, but this is not a court of law, so I don’t have to have any. I just find the notion that any of those guys (right or left) wouldn’t lie to be very funny.

                Like

                • I don’t know Sally Yates personally, but several people whom I trust do. She’s not the kind of person who takes her professional responsibilities lightly.

                  If you don’t know how the FISA court works, then maybe you should withhold chuckling until you do. I think FISA is overly broad, but the process attorneys have to go through are thorough.

                  Like

                • Tony Barnhart- Mr! CFB

                  you mean the team that met with a target’s husband on the tarmac of the Phoenix airport wouldn’t do anything shady to undermine the other guy ? From the Page-Strozok texts to the fact that the dossier was paid for by an opposition campaign and “but for” said dossier the warrant wouldn’t be issued leaves a pretty GD bad taste in my mouth
                  /typing on my phone here

                  Like

                • Your “but for” is bullshit. Don’t take my word for that — read what the Dems on the House Intelligence Committee released last night. It contains language straight from the FISA application. Page was under investigation before the FBI ever saw the Steele dossier. The dossier’s role in the application was minor.

                  As for “the dossier was paid for by an opposition campaign ” itself, that’s another ginned up controversy. First off, the FISA court was made aware of its sourcing. Second, why does that really matter? Let me give you a hypothetical to consider. Say we’re next door neighbors who can’t stand each other. One day, I discover you’ve got a meth lab in your basement and gleefully tip the cops off. They obtain a search warrant, search your house and arrest you. If you think your defense lawyer is going to successfully move to have the warrant tossed because its source was an informant who dislikes you, you’re going to be sadly disappointed.

                  Like

                • Senator, you didn’t comment on his other points. Does that mean you agree that the airport meeting and Page-Strozok texts are troubling? Or is that the way Justice and the FBI are supposed to conduct business?

                  Like

                • C’mon, Gurkha. Have you read all the texts, or just the ones Hannity highlighted? You’ve got a couple of smug assholes who think they’re superior to everyone making snide comments about Trump — and Clinton. Muller yanked him from his team as soon as he learned about them. Explain to me what you find so troubling at this point.

                  As far as Loretta Lynch goes, that was an appalling lack of common sense to allow herself to be manipulated by Slick Willie like she was. I hoped somebody reamed her ass out over it. But again, point me to something concrete. Has anyone found anything was agreed to and acted on that violated the law?

                  All of this is noise being generated for one purpose: to discredit Muller’s investigation. That’s what should trouble all of us.

                  Like

                • Tony Barnhart- Mr! CFB

                  im not a prosecutor (or even a litigator) but i’m pretty sure the “appearance of impropriety” has been enough to sink much lesser cases in the past. But with the Clintons, I suppose the standard is proof beyond all doubt that anything nefarious was occurring.

                  Like

                • How about any proof at all? I don’t like the Clintons any more than you do, but we don’t indict people for appearances.

                  Like

                • CB

                  You should consider a political blog. I learned more from this thread than I have learned through a year and a half of 24 hour news bullshit.

                  Like

                • Thanks, but no thanks. 😉

                  Like

  17. buzman

    So the question I have is…Is it illegal to give kids money or buy them lunch? I understand the NCAA may be upset but what exactly are the legal ramifications? If a UGA player shows up at my tailgate can I not offer him a sandwich? If it is am I supposed to know that or is he?

    Like

  18. To answer Barry Petchesky…I give a shit, & so do lots of other people.

    Like

  19. I doubt the sacred cows will be punished by the NCAA, but it would be very entertaining to see some of the big time folks at Duke, Kentucky, receiving federal time in a federal pen.

    Like