Keeping up with the Sabans

Of all the things I’ve written about the Georgia Way, this may have been the most prescient.

If you manage an SEC football program, there’s a difference between being committed to winning and being financially committed to winning. Everybody wants to win. The hard part is figuring out how to allocate resources to make sure that happens. And, no, that doesn’t mean spending money like a drunken sailor. (We’re looking at you, Tennessee.) It simply means that if you think your rightful place is among the Alabamas, Floridas and LSUs of the world, you’d better take a hard look at what they’re doing and make sure you’re giving your coaching staff the opportunity to keep up with them.

Are things on a better track now? Hard to say. Yes, spending on certain things has crept up, but look what it took to get B-M’s collective head out of its ass. And the jury is still out on whether the increase is being spent wisely.

I posted that on November 30, 2015.  I only mention the date so you can see how it fits in with something David Ching wrote about recruiting spending over the period of 2012-2017:

Saban’s employer, Alabama, ranked third among NCAA Power Five athletic departments in men’s recruiting spending in the five-year academic period between 2012-13 and 2016-17. In that time, Alabama (which averaged $1,815,354.40 per year in men’s recruiting expenses) won four men’s NCAA titles: two in football and two in men’s golf.

Alabama’s neighbors and fellow big spenders were not so fortunate on college athletics’ various fields of play.

According to spending figures available on the U.S. Department of Education’s Equity in Athletics analysis database, the top four was comprised entirely of SEC programs: Tennessee (five-year average of $1,920,789.80 in men’s recruiting spending), Georgia ($1,897,805.80), Alabama and Auburn ($1,815,354.40).

Aside from conference membership, what those schools joining Alabama on the list have in common is that Saban is their toughest opposition on the recruiting trail. They have to spend big in an attempt to keep up with Saban and his Crimson Tide juggernaut, which just claimed its fifth NCAA football title in the last nine seasons.

What those schools do not have in common with Alabama is anything in the trophy case that justifies all of that spending. Over this five-year period, Alabama’s three SEC cohorts atop the list combined for zero men’s NCAA titles, and two of them (Tennessee and Auburn) were just a shade over .500 in football. Auburn did win the 2013 SEC football championship and play for that season’s BCS title, but that was all the trio had to show for its major sports.

With regard to that last sentence, things changed in the next academic year, as we all know.  Which, to reiterate another point I made, is a good indication that (1) Kirby Smart has a clue and (2) Butts-Mehre has finally seen the wisdom of deferring to someone who has a clue.  Both are grounds for considerable appreciation.

9 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, It's Just Bidness, Recruiting

9 responses to “Keeping up with the Sabans

  1. Bright Idea

    How exactly does a school butting heads with Saban budget for recruiting. Whatever you spent last year plus 20%, 25%, 30%???

    Like

    • I think the point is that having a coherent strategy behind spending the money is more important than simply spending as much as Alabama.

      Like

      • Mayor

        ^^This is why I posted many times in the past that we needed to clean out that rat’s nest of hangers-on in B-M before UGA would achieve top level success. I’m beginning to think I was wrong, though. Now that Mike Adams has taken his sorry ass elsewhere maybe the problem has rectified itself.

        Like

  2. No Axe to Grind

    If They, you know who, don’t spend, Kirby won’t be hanging (around).

    Like

  3. jhorne2000

    Reading this makes me curious about the status of the Georgia Way in the mind of our highly esteemed blogger. Has the definition changed? Does it now refer to a specific era of decision making ? Or does the term meaning and current decision making remain largely unchanged , just with certain decisions and outcomes falling outside the norm ?

    Like

  4. South FL Dawg

    It’s a lot more than recruiting budget but your point is spot on. The Georgia Way was just shooting ourselves in the foot. It took Saban to make it obvious.

    Like

  5. DawgPhan

    I guess the flaw here is just looking at the recruiting budget.

    The numbers are all similar for the top programs likely because of regulation on contact. There are only so many people who can contact a SA, which means there is only so much travel you can do. You can only send so many letters, they can only be so big or have so many pages, etc.

    Obviously the west end zone project isnt in these numbers, and never will be. Same with any of the facility upgrades that are done for recruiting. Or hiring extra coaches or just paying your coaches well. And we know that UGA didnt keep up in those budgets.

    Like