Observations from the 35, Anchor Down edition

A game with a 7:30 start time and a fairly straight shot out of Athens afterwards, and I still didn’t get to bed until 1:30 in the morning.  It doesn’t take a lot of effort to make a day with a comfortable Georgia win a pain in the arse, just the right kind of effort.

Pre-game:  When did the first weekend of October start feeling like the first weekend of September?  I mean, it’s fall.  That’s the time for crisp, clear days and cool nights.  What we got instead of that was a friggin’ sauna.  Worse, there was little to no breeze all day.

End of game:  There’s garbage time and then there’s what the refs and Derek Mason inflicted upon the few thousands of us who stayed through the heat until the bitter end of a game that was decided with the first drive of the second half.  Mason called a timeout with fourteen seconds left, trailing by 35 and then some dumbass ref threw a flag for one of the stupidest pass interference penalties you’ll ever see.  All for a meaningless touchdown that didn’t even affect the spread.  (Not to mention I’m not sure the kid scored.)  Everyone responsible for costing me a couple of minutes of my life I’ll never get back — I hate you all.

On the other hand, Georgia is now 4-0 against the state of Tennessee.  Not too shabby.

Without any further ado, it’s on to the bullet points.

  • Georgia actually trailed in a game for the first time all season.  It’s true!  You could look it up, but quickly, as it didn’t last longer than the fifteen seconds it took for Jake Fromm to unload a perfect bomb down the middle to Terry Godwin, who wasn’t having any of that stripping bullshit from the Vanderbilt defensive back.  Godwin looks as healthy as I’ve seen him in a while, which is good news.
  • Ditto for Swift, who put a couple of moves on defenders on his touchdown catch that were sick.
  • In fact, each of Georgia’s first four touchdowns were marked by spectacularly athletic plays:  the aforementioned catches by Godwin and Swift; Holyfield’s determined run, capped by his twist and leap to avoid being knocked out of bounds before crossing the goal line; and Ridley’s tip-drill quality catch, which reminded me a little bit of Godwin’s catch last season at Notre Dame.
  • Five, count ’em, five catches by tight ends.  Be still, my heart.
  • That was the best pass blocking performance I’ve seen out of the offensive line all year, something that was particularly impressive given that it played much of the game down two starters (and Gaillard went out for a little while, too).  Pass pro was so good it forced Vanderbilt to call more blitzes than it wanted and that played into opening up Georgia’s running game as the night went on.
  • Man, I love watching James Cook in the open field.  Imagine what he’ll be like with a full year in the weight room under his belt.
  • Is there a position group that’s improved more beyond expectations than the receiving corps?  They block, they catch, they run excellent routes.  It was good to see the group get rewarded by opening up the playbook.  And they’ve still got the Demetris Robertson card left to play!
  • His passing chart showed it, as did the game:  give Jake Fromm time and he’ll pick you apart.  By and large, he did a fantastic job going through his reads and progressions.  His mechanics were sound and he can make the intermediate throw look effortless when he sets right.
  • Fields is still learning the game, but, man, the physical tools he’s got are ridiculous.  That overthrow to Stanley was a perfect example of both; with more experience, he nails that bad boy.
  • Jim Chaney had a really good day.  Emphasizing the pass was both a good strategy against Vanderbilt (the play action bomb to Godwin took advantage of the ‘Dores playing the run) and, as I previously mentioned, good message sending for upcoming defensive coordinators.  His playcalling on the two-minute drill to close out the first half was impeccable.  One thing I believe he deserves more credit for is play design.  He does a really good job of creating opportunities for players to get open field settings.  Two examples of that were the Godwin touchdown catch, where Ridley managed to clear space in the secondary underneath Godwin and the play action suckered one of the safeties, and the touchdown pass to Swift, where, even though he wasn’t Fromm’s first option, the design of the play left him with open field and a blocking receiver.
  • The kindest thing I can say about the first half defense was that while it was inconsistent, it didn’t get badly burned, or, better put, as badly burned as it probably deserved.  They went from allowing a couple of huge chunk running plays to getting huge stops on third (way to go, Tyler Clark) and fourth (Jordan Davis!, My Gawd, a freshman!) downs to keep Vandy out of the end zone.  But there were also times they’d get the Vanderbilt offense backed up, only to see Shurmur dig out of it with good throws.  The defense clearly had a problem defending the screen pass and kudos go to somebody on the Vandy staff who saw something to be exploited (you have to think Tucker will be looking hard at that this week).  The inconsistency tells me that players on the defensive front aren’t as focused on gap control and run fits on a play-by-play basis as they have to be, and that’s something that needs to be cleaned up against an LSU team that will run, run, run.
  • On the other hand, the defense allowed next to nothing in the third quarter when Georgia put the game away.  So there’s that.
  • I don’t want to be a complete negative Nancy about the defense.  Once again, they went out there with Job One being to deny the big play and once again, Job One was accomplished.  Shurmur didn’t manage a touchdown pass and outside of that early 43-yard gain, Vandy basically had to work every drive in little bites to make something happen.  It couldn’t, which is how you wind up the first half on the short end of a 21-6 score despite running for more yards and dominating time of possession.
  • It’s not that the ILBs are that weak, I’ve come to realize.  It’s that they don’t have a badass Swiss Army knife of a player who can do everything as they had last season.  Some are better at run support, some at coverage.  It’s a race between who Tucker deploys and what an offensive coordinator calls to try to exploit.  That being said, I thought Tae Crowder had his moments.
  • The secondary is so solid.  Nothing spectacular on the day, I admit, but when the dust settled, no big plays, no touchdowns, a mediocre completion percentage are all things I can certainly live with.  A number of defensive backs contributed pass breakups.  This group is doing good work every week.
  • I love watching a punter outkick his coverage as Hardman fields the ball.
  • Rodrigo is making these 50+ yard field goal attempts almost look easy.  It was great the way the crowd ate it up, too.
  • What is it with Vanderbilt and bullshit targeting calls?  It’s a good thing the review protocol has been changed since 2013, or we’d still be howling about Saturday night.  By the way, Steve Shaw, when an officiating crew whiffs that badly on targeting twice, somebody needs some more training.

So, the first half is in the books.  We’ve learned what the coaches already knew, that this is a young team, extraordinarily talented, that is still learning how to play a consistent game.  They’ve blasted through six games out-talenting the opposition.  The next few games are all against teams more closely matched to Georgia’s level, so it’s not unreasonable to expect the team to face a more challenging environment.

How they respond to that will likely be the big question of the second half.  Does the focus that’s been lacking at times finally kick in for sixty minutes and allow this team to play a complete game, or do they have to find a way to respond to an adverse situation that they haven’t dealt with so far?  One thing to consider is that even when this team has played its sloppiest ball, it hasn’t been plagued with turnovers and it’s been able to prevent being burned by the big play.  Can they continue to count on that against tougher competition?  We’ll soon find out.

70 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

70 responses to “Observations from the 35, Anchor Down edition

  1. Jeff Sanchez

    I thought the crowd was great despite the mugginess.

    I think the insane heat of the previous home games this year has had a huge effect on the crowd (and team’s) enthusiasm. More night games earlier in the year the better…

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Biggus Rickus

    At least the call against Vandy looked like it could have been targeted with the way he lowered is head. I think it probably would have stood if he’d actually managed to make solid contact.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Biggus Rickus

      *targeting

      Like

    • How do you not lower your head when the player you’re trying to tackle is going low to the ground?

      He didn’t lead with his head, but with his shoulder, and wasn’t aiming for Fields’ head. It was a bad call, regardless of contact.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Biggus Rickus

        Watch the replay. He is leading with his helmet and goes so far as to curve the crown further towards the ground at the end.

        Like

      • ChiliDawg

        So I don’t think targeting is the right call there, but this is where I get my college and NFL rules crossed up, because I thought going in on a QB sliding like that is a personal foul, separate from targeting.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Biggus Rickus

          I don’t think college has the same rule. As long as you follow the course of the tackle you were trying to make and don’t dive into the player when he slides, I think you’re good, though I’ve never looked up the rule. I didn’t think it was targeting, for the record, because he didn’t actually make helmet-to-helmet contact, ultimately. But I at least understood the flag on that one.

          Like

      • Russ

        Lecounte did it earlier this year against South Carolina (not lowering his head) and was praised for it by Danielson. It can be done, but it takes undoing about 10-15 years of prior training.

        Like

        • Biggus Rickus

          I can’t believe they haven’t been drilling kids on keeping their heads up since targeting became a focus. It’s been five years now.

          Like

    • I think the lowering of the head especially with Fields already in a sliding position was what triggered the flag. I think they got the call right to reverse the targeting penalty. They should have just called a personal foul because the hit wasn’t necessary since Fields was giving himself up.

      The JR Reed call was completely unnecessary. He made the hit with his head up and didn’t launch into the player. There was no reason even to throw the flag there.

      Derek Mason, you suck. You want to know the reason you can’t develop sufficient depth? You keep your starters in late in a blowout loss, so you can score an offensive TD. Maybe you have a Randy Edsell type of bonus for scoring a TD in a game.

      Like

  3. Good read as always.

    My fingers start drumming the table starting around 9AM Sunday waiting 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  4. JCDawg83

    The season really starts this Saturday. Up until now, we’ve been playing scrimmages with other teams to hone our skills. Shit gets real now.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Biggus Rickus

      I’m not sure how much better anyone else on the schedule is than South Carolina or Missouri.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mad Mike

        You mean besides Bama right?

        Like

      • Missouri can beat anyone in the conference besides UGA and Bama. I’m not saying they’re the third-best team, but there’s just not a lot of separation among LSU, UF, MSU, UK, Auburn, and Mizzou. USC had no business winning on Saturday, and they wouldn’t have, if it hadn’t been for the insane weather conditions. USC is definitely a lower-tier SEC team.

        Liked by 1 person

      • JCDawg83

        I disagree, LSU is much better than the chickens and Missouri because of their offensive and defensive lines if nothing else. Florida is getting better too as bad as I hate to admit it. KY is MUCH better than the chickens, I don’t know how they compare to Missouri.

        Like

        • Biggus Rickus

          After watching Florida whip both of their lines, I’m not as convinced they’re all that strong in the trenches. Regardless, they have other flaws that South Carolina and Missouri don’t. It’s not that I think they’re all the same team. I just don’t think the sum total of their parts are much different.

          Liked by 2 people

          • That’s basically how I feel. The middle pack in the SEC is going to be a muddled mess this year, because certain teams will be able to exploit weakness that others can’t. I think Mizzou has a legit O-line. If they can get their receiving corps healthy – and avoid more fluky games during torrential downpours – they can still have a decent year.

            Like

  5. HiAltDawg

    The hunerd yards in penalties (including keeping the last drive by the enemy going) really stands out as th negative of the game. A whole field of free yardage, sheesh! The runs up the middle that everybody is racing to out worry each other about is purely schematic. While this year’s Junkyard Dawgs ain’t passed the eye test (imho), yet. The numbers: 2017 Lock & Shurmur combined 32-56 425yds 5TD 1 Int 0 sacks 7 pbu and 2018 37-76 390yds 0 TD 1 Int 3 sacks 15 pbu. Kirbs stubbornness to keep everything in front of the Safeties and making teams string together drives against bad teams has worked so far. These juggernaut, greatest teams in the world loading up the best shots of best shots, ever on our schedule ain’t really designed to beat that philosophy.

    Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      In fairness on the penalties, it was a ridiculous crew, and at least three of the calls were bullshit (the two interference calls and the unnecessary roughness call on Campbell). On the season, the team has not been especially prone to penalties.

      Liked by 1 person

      • HiAltDawg

        I think a post game show said we were better penalty-wise this year than last year so I might contextually see that as a problem more than those 12 yd runs up the middle that end up a punt a few plays later. Yes, refs are terrible but by now it’s a feature not a bug.

        Like

      • Debby Balcer

        That is the truth. The game took so long because they called too many dumb penalties. It was like they were trying to be the star of the game. I taped the game to watch it when I got home and even extending the tape by 30 minutes there was over five minutes left on the clock when it stopped taping. That last TD was a gift from the refs. There was no PI and the player was down before he crossed the line. You could feel the crowd in the game for the first tine all season. Hopefully the next home game we will have true football weather.

        Liked by 2 people

    • DawgByte

      I agree. I watched a replay of the game yesterday and some of those offensive penalties were directly responsible for taking points off the board. Total drive killers. Smart & Co. need to clean this up.

      Like

    • Bo

      This. A little surprised that the Senator had nothing to say about 13 penalties for 115 yards. Atrocious. It’s going to cost the Dawgs a game if they don’t get it cleaned up.

      Like

  6. HR

    Good stuff senator. Bravo.

    Like

  7. Just Chuck (The Other One)

    The kid didn’t score. It happened in our end zone. You could see it didn’t cross the goal line on the play. You could see on the replay it didn’t cross. The kid didn’t score.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. BigSam

    ” and, as I previously mentioned, good message sending for upcoming defensive coordinators”………….here’s looking at you, Todd F’ing Grantham.

    Like

  9. paul

    “Does the focus that’s been lacking at times finally kick in for sixty minutes.” This is what worries me. I hope the answer is yes, but if you can’t stay focused against inferior talent, doing so against better teams seems problematic. Especially for younger players.

    Like

  10. 202dawg

    On not having that Swiss Army Knife at ILB a ala ‘R’, I enjoyed seeing Tindall get more snaps. I love what Rice and Taylor give on the field, but as athleticism go I think Patrick, Tindall, and Crowder would be stupid good ok the field at the same time. You know, once Tindall grows up a little.

    Like

  11. Greg

    “Fields is still learning the game, but, man, the physical tools he’s got are ridiculous. That overthrow to Stanley was a perfect example of both; with more experience, he nails that bad boy”.

    Thought he made a great decision on that play…..it was a free play (penalty) and he decided to unleash the ball, nothing to lose. Hell of a arm…

    Like

  12. Uglydawg

    As always, I enjoyed reading your observations.
    The refs were giving Vandy sympathy calls in the 4th. It wasn’t PI and the kid’s butt hit the ground outside the goal line…I guess the replay guys “In Birmingham” (I hate that ) had already packed it in and were out the door to their cars by that time. It mattered little, but still sucks.
    I even felt the repeated calls on Vandy for having too many in the backfield were ticky tack. I think it was just a matter of a wider receiver not getting close enough to the los. The refs were equally over-active on both side.
    Yes, the DCs of coming opponents have been given a good look into the maw of hell.
    I said this yesterday..I would much rather be Georgia’s DC looking at LSU/UF/AU/KY film than to be one of their DCs looking at Georgia’s.
    And if Arky can manage over 30 against Alabama, what is the Dawg’s potential?

    Like

    • Just Chuck (The Other One)

      Do you think Nick may have been thinking about us when he complained about the points his defense gave up on Saturday?

      Like

      • Uglydawg

        If he wasn’t, he probably is now. This was Cheney’s “How do you like this? Did you know we can do this” display. I thought the little counter handoff from Fields to Holyfield was quite the message. The problem is that Tua possess both Fromm’s and Field’s gifts. The problem for Alabama is if anything happens to Tua..and I’m not wishing an injury on any kid, but it would be a thing. They’ll win the West, but Georgia is going to have to slay a couple of tough dragons to win the East.

        Like

  13. Bulldog Joe

    Freshmen #99 Jordan Davis and #55 Trey Hill are maturing at just the right time in the schedule. Davis is huge and difficult to move in the middle. Hill knew his assignments and we did not slow down with him in the game.

    Depth along the lines is a beautiful thing.

    Like

    • DawgFlan

      Loved seeing #99 Jordan Davis out there. Big guy that can handle a double team. In the post game presser Smart seemed reluctant to praise him. I hope Davis continues to get in shape, practice well, and learn the defense, because he could be a difference maker on this team.

      Like

      • Macallanlover

        Yes he can make a big difference, a huge one actually. Frees up those ILBs, who need some help. Davis is the key to shoring up that middle as no one else seems to have that ability, based on what we have seen. Otherwise, Tucker will have to schematically provide a fix. One of those has to happen, or we will be a sitting duck for teams with the ability to take advantage of our Achilles Heel.

        Like

    • W Cobb Dawg

      I’ve been watching Davis over the first 6 games. The guy is an anchor in the middle. Won’t surprise me if he’s a starter next season.

      I know we all fixate on the 5 star recruits. But ya gotta give Kirby credit for having a great eye for talent. He’s found some real diamonds in the rough with Rice, David Marshall, Kindley, Herrien, and now Davis. You could probably throw JR Reed, Nizialek, and McGhee in with that group.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Dylan Dreyer's Booty

      Maybe I am wrong, but I seem to recall Ledbetter in an interview saying Davis was a monster, even if he didn’t have all the stars coming out of HS that others had. Said he was a beast in the weight room, repping five plates like it was just two or something like that. Kirby is probably soft pedaling the praise because he makes some mistakes we don’t notice, but still, I am glad he’s on our side.

      Like

  14. Harold Miller

    I thought Patrick put in a pretty solid performance. LeCounte III needs to step it up a bit. He is still missing tackles at times.

    Like

  15. ChiliDawg

    Kirby has processed us. I found myself realizing at some point during the game on Saturday night that, though I found myself frustrated at times in the first half, my expectations are much different than they used to be. Yes, the defense often looked bad in the first half. But we only gave up 3 points, didn’t we? That’s where we are now.

    I saw a factoid posted yesterday – Georgia has started 6-0 in consecutive years for the first time in school history. Is that right? If so, that’s remarkable, and kind of goes to show you how much our standards have changed. And by the way, so have everyone else’s w/r/t perception of Georgia as a program. We blow teams out and it’s kind of just ho hum from the media, who pencils us in on their playoff predictions as a sidenote while they spend time on the more interesting subject of what other teams will be in. Hell of a time to be alive.

    Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      Georgia’s rarely had great (or nearly great) teams in consecutive seasons, and there was always an early loss or tie when they have, namely in ’81, ’83 and ’03.

      Like

      • ChiliDawg

        Yup. Previously we had those cycles where we endured a couple of tough years, had one pretty good year and then held our breath for that one team that was supposed to be really good but would trip up somewhere. Now it feels like the floor has risen up to something much higher. I don’t see this program going through many “rebuilding years” while Kirby is coach.

        Like

        • Biggus Rickus

          I mean, theoretically, this would be the rebuilding year, and I honestly don’t see how they’re going to lose. It will probably happen, because teams rarely go undefeated, but as it stands, I don’t think anyone until the championship game should stay within two touchdowns.

          Like

          • ChiliDawg

            Oh, I could see any of the next four keeping it within two touchdowns, I just don’t see them winning. They can’t score points with any reliability, and we can score in a hurry. I’d say LSU and Kentucky probably have the best shot at keeping it close, because of their physical ground game. Auburn and Florida I see as more likely blowouts.

            Like

            • Uglydawg

              I hope you’re right about Florida. They play with great enthusiasm and look like they’re coming around. But they may have been able to look so good, swarming LSU’s running game and short passing game, because LSU seems so limited in what they can do. Florida’s defense can’t afford to sell out like that against UGA, can they? I keep seeing that little counter handoff from Fields to Holyfield…Fields looked like he was going to roll to the left on an RPO, Vandy bought it and Holyfield slipped off to the right for a big gain.

              Like

  16. Randall Adams

    Rock solid – thanks

    Like

  17. PTC DAWG

    I can already smell the corn dogs.

    Like

  18. ugafidelis

    As I was watching that punt descend towards Mecole, I said out loud, Oh good God Almighty. Every time he touches the ball with a little bit of space, I think ‘here we go.’

    Like

  19. Dylan Dreyer's Booty

    “…and the touchdown pass to Swift, where, even though he wasn’t Fromm’s first option…”

    Wut? You mean he didn’t just lock down on his primary receiver? Unpossible!! 😉

    Like

  20. W Cobb Dawg

    The ILB corps is much worse when Rice isn’t playing. Seems to me that Patrick, Taylor and Crowder are all OLBs playing inside. They aren’t the natural tacklers that Rice is. I hope Tindall and Q. Walker are legit ILBs. We need them.

    History lesson: I began watching football in the golden age of MLBs. Butkus, Nitschke, Curtis, Bergey, Schmidt, Jordan, Lanier, Buoniconti, Nobis – seemingly every nfl team had a hard-nose MLB. When all those monsters retired, they were followed by the golden age of fast, athletic OLBs – L.Taylor, Swilling (I know), Greg Lloyd, C. Bennett, K. Greene, Derrick Thomas, etc. My point being there’s a huge difference between ILB and OLB skillsets and attitudes. They aren’t interchangeable. But y’all knew that.

    Getting back to our ILBs, other than Rice we just don’t have a tough tackling machine at ILB.

    Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      I think you’re underselling Patrick. He’s not perfect, but he is a proper inside linebacker.

      Like

    • CB

      None of our ILB’s have an OLB skill set. Not sure where you’re getting that. The fact is they just aren’t all that great as a unit. Patrick hasn’t returned to last year’s pre-suspension form, Crowder is really only effective in pass coverage, and Taylor is just bad. Add that to Monty Rice being hampered by injury and it’s simply not a strong point for the team right now. I would disagree with the comparison of defenses of 30-40 years ago. The game has changed way too much (especially on offense), for that to be relevant.

      I do however agree about Tindall and Walker. Got some bad news with regard to you ILB OLB comparison, Walker spent most of his time in hs rushing from the outside.

      Like

  21. I will say this…good win, but the streak of slow starts has now reached a very uncomfortable three games in a row. Gotta get that fixed.
    As to our difficulty with defending the screen or swing pass, we better get that shit under control quick, because LSU runs a lot of those types of plays.
    I have full confidence that Mel and Kirby will concoct an antidote for both of these ailments before we leave for Red Stick on Friday.
    Go Dawgs!

    Like

  22. CB

    What does Juwan Taylor do well at ILB? Whenever a big play happens up the middle he is usually the culprit. I hope to see his playing time greatly decreased this week. He was terrible against Vandy. I’d rather see us take our chances with a recovering Monty Rice.

    Like

  23. Macallanlover

    Last TD “didn’t even affect the spread”, not so fast my friend. Had I taken Vandy +27′, which many bettors did, I would have bought the 1/2 point to make it +28, and ended up a push as a result of the non-TD. So it did affect it for, probably a few, bettors. AI took UGA -27′ so I won by a 1/2 point, but was afraid idiot Mason would go for two and would have beat me if successful. Why didn’t he? Just more meaningless points to him.

    I have always liked Mason but that was pure BS, wish Kirby hadn’t dodged the questioned about it after the game. He should have taken Mason to task, imo. I think the losing coach, victim, should signal a call for mercy by putting in their backups first, or at least running the clock to shorten the game. Otherwise, the coach who is winning should continue to play their entire offense with mixed runs and passes, whether using starters or backups until the white flag is raised. That was disgusting for Mason to keep his starting QB in until he got dinged up scrambling, and especially for calling the TO. Hope Kirby hangs 70 on him next season, impose our will, indeed!

    Also, Sankey should call Shaw in and tell him to stop with the 5 men in the backfield stuff. He has done that ticky-tacky crap for more than just this year. But he has stepped it up in 2018, last week against TN and against both teams this past Saturday. We get it Steve, you know the rulebook, but a 6 inch alignment in a situation where it doesn’t affect the defensive coverage is miniscule. How about focus your guys on getting the major calls right and not on making a technical point that only disrupts the game flow, and lengthens the game. Majoring in minors isn’t your greatest need at this point. For instance: how about making the ball carrier cross the goal line with the ball before awarding a TD?

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Down island way

    This is not a complaint/ bitch about our game ……….college football in general is suffering from BAD officiating calls, no matter the game/conference. You can give me the speed of the game, rule changes and such, appears as though the zebras call what they think they saw/heard versus, what they see in real time. As in pro tennis, the referee rely on instant replay/replay booth toooooo much to make a call.

    Like

  25. Macallanlover

    The primary contribution Chaney made to that final drive of the first half was not ordering us to take a knee and run the clock out. Once Fromm had the go ahead, that was all on him and the other 10 guys on the field. Without a timeout, playing at warp speed JF showed what a veteran can do when surrounded by talented players. It was all experience, brains, and instincts; it went like it would be diagrammed in a conference room. Chaney may have played a role at the whiteboard during the week, but that was solo flying in its purest definition. Telling you, we would see a better mix with the “coach on the field making the calls” and intel/suggestions coming from above. Would love to have tried it in a cupcake game. I know I have developed a bias after the first season with Chaney, but I have seen nothing to change my mind. I think he is the reason we look so out of sync on offense in the first half, just never seem to get in a rhythm.

    Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      Yes, Chaney had nothing to do with coaching or preparing the offense to run the two minute drill. There is no coach more hated by his fanbase than the Georgia offensive coordinator…at least not now that Mike Stoops has been fired.

      Like

    • Mac, so you think they let the QB call whatever plays he wants during a two-minute drill? Does he get to make the substitution calls, too?

      After the first series, Georgia scored on seven of its next eight possessions. Imagine how much better the offense would have done if it had only been in sync.

      Like

  26. whb209

    Come on Senator, facts are not allowed in the comment section..
    You should know better..

    Like