Observations from the 35, Tech delenda est edition

I know I’ve harped on this a little, but I can’t help but observing that Saturday gave the lie to the narrative that the Georgia Tech rivalry means little in this day and age.  Students were out on Thanksgiving holiday, the weather wasn’t particularly pleasant and it was a nooner — all things that would suggest a flat day in Sanford Stadium.

Instead, the place was jumping with energy from the opening kickoff.  The crowd was loud, especially when the defense needed it, loud enough that Tech was forced to call a timeout on offense to gather itself.  The team was as focused as it’s ever been this season.  You’d think it would be hard to stay pumped defending the grind that is the triple option, yet the defense played with high energy all game long.

And if you had any doubt about how much Kirby wanted to mash Tech, just consider that the first string on both sides stayed on the field through 45-7, or less than two minutes remaining in the third quarter.

If that’s an example of no big deal, then I hope Georgia plays a lot more teams it doesn’t care about.  And with that, here come the bullet points.

  • There were so many superlatives that emerged from the game, I hardly know where to start, but I’ve got to say that few things surpass watching Tech’s offense, down 45-7, run a 15-play drive that ate up nine minutes on the clock, gained less than forty yards and wound up turning the ball over on downs.
  • Although there was the bizarre decision by the genius to go for it on fourth and six inside Tech territory when it was still possible to pretend the Jackets were in the game, watch the offense get stuffed and then have the Dawgs drive the dagger into GT’s heart with the bomb to Hardman.
  • By the way, on that play, what do you think was going through the minds of Chaney and Fromm when they saw Tech’s defense line up an inside linebacker in single coverage on Mecole?
  • When I play offensive coordinator in the stands, it usually involves the game of counting the box to call run or pass, but after doing so for a few series, I quit because it really didn’t matter.  At one point, Tech committed ten men to the box, Georgia still ran the ball and came up with a decent gain.
  • I get that there’s a significant talent disparity, but making matters worse is that Georgia was the better conditioned team and by a noticeable margin.  Tech can try to pretend that its poor tackling was purely a matter of bad execution on the part of its defense, but I routinely saw Georgia players simply outmuscle Tech’s.  Similarly, there were plays where it appeared that the Jackets had the outside sealed to prevent a gain, only to see a much faster Dawg outrun the defense.
  • What can you say about Jake Fromm over the past five weeks?  He’s been nothing short of brilliant.  The bomb to Hardman was perfectly thrown, with no break in the receiver’s stride.  An even better touchdown pass was the one to Holloman; that one was so good I almost didn’t realize how good a catch the receiver made on it.  Fromm was 13-16 on the day and really could have dictated whatever passing numbers he wanted.  Crazy good.
  • Fromm also could throw the ball to whomever he wanted.  By my count, those thirteen completions went to at least seven different receivers.  Interestingly, I don’t remember a single completion to a running back.  (Not that it mattered.)
  • Fromm’s passing day came with zero sacks.  Another great performance from a patched up offensive line that saw a true freshman start at right guard.
  • If I were a defensive coordinator calling plays against Georgia’s two-minute drill, I’d make sure to have somebody cover Isaac Nauta.
  • Is there anything that really needs to be said about Holyfield and Swift at this point, other than Swift’s return to health makes them such a dangerous duo?
  • It’s nitpicking, I know, but why do they run James Cook so much up the middle?  It’s like Carlton Thomas redux.  Maybe with another year of S&C it’ll be better.
  • As much fun as it was to watch the offense have its way, the defense’s performance was nothing short of stunning.  I’ve never seen a Georgia defense handle the triple option better.  Never.
  • That started with the defensive front, which executed at a high level all game long.  Ledbetter, Walker and Herring were particularly dominant.  Two things were noticeable:  one, the line did a fantastic job keeping its feet in the face of constant cut blocking, and two, showed real discipline in maintaining assignment football.  (When you’ve got a true freshman like Adam Anderson kicking ass with containment, you’ve done your job, coaches.)  There were so few misses that it was almost a surprise when a Georgia player didn’t execute properly.
  • Jordan Davis had a freakin’ sack!
  • They weren’t under any real pressure to pass defend, so it was reasonable to expect a decent day out of the inside linebackers.  They did better than decent; in particular, Crowder had an excellent game.
  • It’s got to be hard being a defensive back going up against the triple option — long stretches of nothing but being blocked by receivers broken up by the occasional attempt to catch you sleeping on the pass — but the secondary did its part, as well.  Campbell got in on a sack, Baker had a nice tackle on a running play, but more importantly when Marshall tried to throw the ball on the first string secondary, there was never anything there.  (Marshall’s definitely mastered the sideline out of bounds throw, though.)
  • The offense and defense were fantastic.  Special teams were anything but.  I’m not sure what is going on with Blankenship, but that makes for a second straight week of poor early kickoffs before he settled in.  The kickoff returned for a touchdown was the result of the right side of the coverage team losing contain.  That was followed by an offside call on Rodrigo’s first kick that was a touchback.  He also clanked a field goal attempt that was within his range.  The one bright spot was another strong Hardman punt return.  I’m not sure why there’s been a slide in special teams this season, but they’d better get that fixed before the SECCG.  Just sayin’.
  • Georgia scored touchdowns on its first five possessions, a field goal on its sixth as the clock ran down to end the first half and another touchdown on its next possession.  If only they’d replace Jim Chaney with a real offensive coordinator…
  • Defensively, Smart and Tucker painted their 2018 masterpiece.  Focus, discipline and execution were all off the charts.  Let’s hope they keep it coming.
  • I guess I can’t let a couple of special moments with the genius pass without comment.  First, he pretty much lost it when his B-back was flagged for a downfield block below the waist.  The reason I say that is because he was still bitching hard at the refs about it three plays afterwards.  He topped that later, though, when he had to burn a time out because he hadn’t sent a player in with the next play call.
  • Is there a more dick move than calling a timeout with 44 seconds left in the game, down 45-14?  I suppose Johnson hopes a few weeks from now everyone will look at the score and figure it wasn’t as much of an ass-wuppin’ as it really was.
  • The Jackets knew early on that they weren’t going to be in a good place at game’s end to do any hedge harvesting, so they settled for cheering on the sidelines when the replay booth didn’t flag one of theirs for targeting on Beal, who, I might add, left the game with what looked like a concussion.  Nice.

Really, season-enders don’t get much better than that.  Now, on to bigger and (hopefully) better.

110 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

110 responses to “Observations from the 35, Tech delenda est edition

  1. Bigshot

    It was a glorious day!! But, one more TD would have broken the record.

    Like

  2. This is how it’s supposed to be- we have way too much where Tech should even be in the game with us. Every year I mean.

    I have said it before and I will say it again- next years beatdown will be Johnson’s last game as coach.

    Like

    • Bigshot

      Please no! I want the genius to stay.

      Like

      • Russ

        Yep, can’t we make donations or write letters to keep him?

        Like

      • Otto

        I am not worried about Tech with or without Johnson.

        If Johnson were to leave they will be rebuilding for the next 3-5 years at minimum to run a more conventional offense.

        If they run a more conventional offense Smart does not have to take prep time away from other things for 1 game a year.

        Like

        • AusDawg85

          And they can only recruit rocket scientists like Reggie Ball, so…

          Like

          • Otto

            The odds are better than to take back the 2 series Stats the Calc students at the NATS have to brag about, largest margin of victory at 48 (I was hopeful that would fall Saturday), and the longest win streak at 8.

            I think Smart can capture both of those. 2 Ws down 7 to go.

            Like

  3. Bill Glennon

    Biggest highlight of the game for Tech was the jubilation in not getting their player thrown out of the game for a cheap helmet shot on a touchback.

    On that kickoff return, you could see on TV the left side sliding down toward the middle before the kick and they all pinched in immediately toward the middle. The guy on the end was the one who flew down and whiffed on the tackle at the 5 yard line on the opposite side of the field. This may be by design, but at every level of football you are told to “stay in your lane.” No one did that on that KO.

    Like

  4. Chopdawg

    Crowd noise was a big factor IMO…see Paul Johnson’s quote about his players confusing “three” and “freeze” in the huddle.

    Haven’t seen our Dawgs look better this year.

    Like

  5. JCDawg83

    Senator, you are spot on about the tech game mattering to the fans. A noon kickoff on a cold, grey Saturday after Thanksgiving and Sanford was pretty well full and loud. The students definitely came back in big numbers for the game as well and we had been told all week about how the students don’t care and wouldn’t come back for a noon kickoff game. Tech is so easy to hate it really makes it easy for the fans to show up and be into the game.

    Like

  6. It doesn’t matter what time we play Fech. If the game matters in the bigger scheme of things, we beat the brakes off them. 2011, 2012, 2017, and Saturday speak volumes. When they have beaten under Fish Fry, those games really meant nothing for us (2014 possibly excluded because we pooch kicked ourselves right out of the NY6).

    Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      Since Tech’s upset win in 1927, I think Georgia has entered the Tech game with one or zero losses 18 times (’41, ’42, ’46, ’48, ’59, ’66, ’68, ’71, ’76, ’78, ’80, ’81, ’82, ’83, ’02, ’12, ’17 and ’18) and lost none of them. Maybe a third were even close regardless of how good Tech was.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Just Chuck (The Other One)

    You mentioned it but, the passing game really stood out for me. We have end zone seats and it was a real pleasure to watch a wide open receiver headed toward you and Fromm with all the time he needed to pick him out. I know a lot of this was the talent differential but great line blocking and receivers that the defense couldn’t run with made for a great afternoon.

    Like

  8. gastr1

    I know this is a pedantic question, but I must know…is it a law now that “day” and “age” must be joined? I’ve actually invented a new dictionary entry in my head, “dayenage” –which rhymes with “mayonnaise”–from hearing so many hack sports broadcasters say it.

    Rant over, thanks, back to your regularly-scheduled programming.

    Like

    • Bill Glennon

      In this day and age, everything is pendantic. By the way, the last sentence in your post includes a fragment and a run-on.

      Liked by 1 person

      • gastr1

        “The last sentence in your post includes a fragment and a run-on”–right, but those were intentional style modifications, not clichés. 🙂

        Like

    • Morris Day

      Heh, mayonnaise… in October 2016, attended the Hellman’s 500 at Talladega… still can hear the drunk a few rows back yelling.. “the may-YO-nayyyysss 500”. Good times.

      Like

    • Harold Miller

      Never the less you get high marks for using pedantic correctly in a sentence.

      Like

  9. Bulldog Joe

    The GT timeout at 44 seconds in the game was crucial.

    That 28 yard TD pass against the 4th string D will be the centerpiece of GT’s 2019 recruiting and hype videos.

    Bless their hearts.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Rchris

    I so love your references. When I get them, they absolutely crack me up. This one conjured up images of the 2019 Dawgs, after the game next year, sowing salt all up and down Grant Field to make sure the Jackets could never grow crops again. BTW, all your points about that football stuff were completely spot on as well.

    Like

  11. Sattwater Dawg

    Great recap, thank you. If I could add one thing, the most impressive defensive stat is the almost complete lack of mention of the safeties during the game. Then normal method of defending the option is to bring at least one safety up, if not both, in order to contain the pitch. The big option plays then come because the 2nd level has been vacated.

    We completely dominated the PJ vaunted triple option with just the front 7. I think I remember hearing LeCounte’s name one time at the game. The box score shows it, 1 tackle for LeCounte, 0 for JR Reid.

    That is utter domination.

    Liked by 1 person

    • That also kept the Genius from being able to sneak one of his receivers behind coverage to hit a big play in the passing game. Excellent point, Saltwater.

      Like

    • Bright Idea

      The front 7 played with technique but most of all they seemed very pissed off when they hit the Techies. I enjoyed that but FishFry blamed it on misreads.

      Like

  12. I found it interesting Fields didn’t get in even up 28-7 and game well in hand in the first half. Probably reading too much into this, but I think it probably means he is not part of the game plan for next week unless Jake breaks his arm. I can’t fault them for this, as I do not believe Justin is ready to make a difference against Bama, even in a very specific change of pace capacity.

    Like

    • Uglydawg.

      Bat..everything CKS and Chaney are doing is a chess move in advance of the ‘Bama game.
      Just like the Q the Senator has about running James Cook up the middle a few times. When he comes in, Alabama cannot assume he is taking it outside, it also sets up a playfake where he is the receiver.
      Everything done and not done is a part of a larger picture that we will hopefully see this Saturday.
      Fields will need to keep his powder dry.

      Like

    • gastr1

      I wouldn’t trust Fields with much at this point, myself. You never quite know what you’re going to get.

      Like

  13. All Time Dawg

    The difference in pure conditioning, size and muscle mass made me think of watching Alabama walk out onto the filed in Sanford Stadium in 2015. Alabama was obviously so much bigger and stronger than we were at first sight. We now have that look in comparison to Tech. Its good to see. We have turned the page in the strength and conditioning phase and are now the “Big Boys”.

    Like

  14. SEDA Dawg

    Kind of off topic, but maybe not.. I usually don’t pay much attention to the opposing teams band during the game but for some reason, the Tech band was loud. I mean to the point where when they were playing and the red coats were playing, I couldn’t hear our guys at all. We have seats on the opposite side on the 50 so it wasn’t like we were closer to them or anything. Anyways, just something that I noticed Saturday that I hadn’t before this season. Figured I missed some AJC by Mark Bradley where some Techie figured out a way to amplify his trumbone and trumpet through the school of engineering over there.

    Like

    • 92 grad

      There’s obviously a lot of ambient sound produced by the bands, but you were likely directly in front of the bees which made a difference. Marching bands are primarily making sound directionally, meaning, the volume is aimed whichever way the trumpets and trombones are pointed. When I was a redcoat we hade 55 trumpets, 60 trombones, and I think 24 sousas. I’m not sure the current redcoats boast those numbers but I’m sure they’re quite loud if you’re in the line of fire.

      Like

  15. Go Dawgs!

    I watched the game when I got home yesterday on my DVR, and I don’t know if I’ve ever fully appreciated what a potty mouth Paul Johnson has. That’s OK, though. I’d probably be cussing a blue streak, too, if I was being humiliated in front of 93,000 people and whoever was left watching on TV that hadn’t switched over to the Ohio State game.

    Beating Tech is always sweet and it was definitely that on Saturday. Now, with apologies to Coach Johnson, we’ve got bigger fish to fry.

    Like

  16. Husky Jeans

    The celebration on Tech’s sideline after the non-targeting call on a kickoff/touchback, after a player was obviously injured from the hit, while they were getting the crap beat out of them, was one of the weirdest things I’ve ever seen. I mean it was really, really strange.

    Like

  17. Dawgy45

    Re: Marshall’s skill at passes out of bounds
    I was watching at home and while I did have the sound on, I don’t pay much attention to the announcers. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure one of Marshall’s passes out of bounds elicited a Reggie Ball reference from one of the announcers. You know it’s a good day when comparisons to Ball are being made.

    Liked by 1 person

    • W Cobb Dawg

      You are correct. They designated the throwaway out of bounds pass as the Reggie Ball play. I believe they said it a couple times.

      Like

      • Russ

        Yeah, the announcers were straight up trolling Tech after a while. Dari (at halftime) said his Thanksgiving turkey put up more of a fight than Tech.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Harold Miller

          You are all correct. I was fighting off a pretty bad cold so didn’t go to the game. The trolling by the announcers and studio crew were classic. I am so glad that Reggie Balls memory lives on… dog…

          Like

  18. Biggen

    No bullet point about the shade the play-by-play caller threw at Reggie Ball on the 1st Tech possession in the 3rd quarter??

    Like

  19. Spike

    All excellent points. One of the finest UGA efforts against tech I’ve ever seen. And ZERO passing yards!. Zero!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. AusDawg85

    Re: special teams and early Blankenship KO’s. Almost got the sense the first was intentionally directional and the next intentionally short to test trying to pin tech down and/or create a turnover. I say this because his remaining KO’s easily reached the back of the end zone. If true, that could be Kirby overthinking things a little…a trait of The Process his mentor can succumb to at times and what I believe was the core of the problem vs LSU (e.g. fake FG because they say something on film and wanted to test it, regardless of whether the timing was right). On the other hand, his overall philosophy of impose our will suggests he wouldn’t fool around with stuff like that.

    High performance race cars are sensitive to missing a gear shift, so it may be that he’s getting this group to a knife’s edge sharpness, both players and coaches, which can result in a hiccup. For Saturday, we’ll need each and every razor’s edge decision and execution to work. Frankly, if this is Kirby’s “flaw” I like it.

    Like

    • Bulldog Joe

      A wet field can provide some turnover opportunities. GT kicked off to an upfield blocker until Georgia moved Herrien there.

      Georgia tried to kick it to the corner on the first two kickoffs, loading the left side of the coverage. Rod narrowly missed the corner by a yard on the first kick, but played it safer by kicking it to the hash on the second. The returner made a cut and had only one man to beat on the right side of our coverage.

      With a dry field this weekend, hopefully that experiment is over.

      Like

    • Maybe I have missed it, but I have not seen anyone comment on the fact that all of Blankenship’s short kick-offs in the Umass and Tech games occurred when he was kicking into the West end zone – no exceptions. And if I remember correctly, the field goal klunker was in the West end zone. There was no appreciable wind differential that I recall. Maybe the huge video board has suddenly become a distraction.

      Like

    • Russ

      Kirby said in his presser that they did that on purpose against Tech and against UMass to get some work in on coverage. He also said they obviously have some work left to do on that.

      Like

    • Bright Idea

      In warmups kicking toward the bridge HotRod was coming up way short on 55 yard FGs. I wonder if a decision was made to kick it high instead because the kick that was returned was very high and in fact Kirby bragged on the kick but the tackles were missed. I think the first one was simply shanked.

      Like

      • BMan

        The one that was returned for a TD was also kicked from the 45 due to GT holding on the PAT before. It looked like it was purposefully kicked high for a coverage unit to try trapping Tech deep. I can’t imagine with the light winds of Saturday that Hot Rod couldn’t have kicked it to the stands from the 45.

        Like

        • The Dawg abides

          Nope. That penalty was declined. You could see the ref telling Kirby it wasn’t applicable on the kickoff. Kirby stated in the presser he had no problem with the kick because it had a 4.2 sec hang time and landed right on the goal line. He blamed the coverage team for the return. The returner made the first guy miss inside the ten, then the contain broke down. A little more discipline and control, he gets tackled inside the 15.

          Like

  21. SlobberKnocker

    One of the things I was most interested to see was how we lined up the linebackers after last year stacking them in an I and allowing Roquan to chase the pitch (first and only time I’ve ever seen that). This year, our base set had three down linemen and two MLB’s (not unusual). However, we backed the two OLB off the line about a yard, allowing them to either read the play motioning in their direction and stepping up to contain or, if the play went the other way, move behind the DT to fill for the dive. We also had a set that we brought in a 3rd MLB (probably technically playing SS role) and stacking the three in a triangle. This allowed the front two to take the dive while the back MLB (usually Crowder?) chased the pitch play.

    Regarding the TO and pass the endzone with time running out. I so wanted to see us line up in the victory formation and send a single receiver deep just to answer. OTOH, I guess there is something to be said for not matching their lack of class.

    Liked by 1 person

    • tbia

      No, you’re wrong. Coach Fish Fry said they see that all the time (BS). I think we are understating the impact of Baker even against a triple option team. We NEVER had to leave a safety with any responsibility for his receiver, letting them spy the potential pitch backs. Also allowed an extra linebacker to stay in the middle.

      I am also ready to proclaim Jordan Davis as our Freshman of the Year.

      Like

  22. Corch Irvin Meyers New WR Corch

    It may be better to save the defending Jim Chaney comments until after the Bama game; if there’s a need for them then. It’s probable his performance against Bama (much like in the fourth quarter of the Natty last year) and like against LSU this year, will leave no one with the ability to defend him, but I guess it’s possible he may give those of us who want him replaced the opportunity to eat crow.

    Jim Chaney in three years is who he shows us he is. When he has superior talent, he looks good. When the talent is equal or tilts away from him, he’s the guy I’ve been saying he is for three years: thoroughly mediocre and the reason why we’ll never win a Natty as long as he’s here.

    The stats that say were the “third best offense” in the nation are about as believable as the stats that said Michigan was the best defense in the nation. Sans context, of course it looks good. I think we’re more the offense that looked like crap against a good LSU defense, but will be happy to be proven wrong this weekend.

    If I’m proven right, though, Kirby better move quickly on Dan Enos, because if Bama loses their OC to a head coaching job, he’s next in line there.

    Like

    • Dylan Dreyer's Booty

      It’s probable his performance against Bama (much like in the fourth quarter of the Natty last year) and like against LSU this year….

      Whoa, that’s some heavy lifting there, picking out 4-5 quarters of play over a span of 13 games, ignoring all the other quarters of play that have had great success, and ignoring defensive lapses, some bogus refereeing and putting all that on Chaney.

      Fortunately, Kirby has a clue.

      Like

    • The stats that say were the “third best offense” in the nation are about as believable as the stats that said Michigan was the best defense in the nation. Sans context, of course it looks good.

      LOL. Of course!

      How many teams have played great defenses week in and week out? I’ll hang up and listen to your answer, context king.

      Like

      • Corch Irvin Meyers New WR Corch

        I’ve maintained that we’re not winning a National Title with Jim Chaney as our OC. So far, I’ve been correct. The players we’ve recruited deserve a better tactician and coach, not someone who turtles in the fourth quarter of the most important game of their lives.

        Also, the last two years, Jim Chaney is 2-2 against the best defenses he’s faced those years, splitting Auburn last year, and losing to LSU and beating Auburn this year. We lose to Bama on Saturday, and he’s 2-3. That’s not good enough if you want to win rings. I don’t believe Chaney’s the guy who gets you over the hump. His entire career’s work has born that out as true, including his work at UGA. Good enough is no longer good enough. We deserve and should demand greatness.

        I’d rather have the guy who took over one of Chaney’s moribund offenses and turned it into the class of the SEC for two years, who is also a proven QB whisperer in Dan Enos. Sue me.

        Like

        • Eh, you’re welcome to your opinion. I just think some of your arguments don’t hold much water.

          Like this:

          I’ve maintained that we’re not winning a National Title with Jim Chaney as our OC. So far, I’ve been correct.

          Kirby’s been through two full seasons, making one national title game which was ultimately lost because the Georgia defense gave up a TD on a 2nd-and-26 pass. And that came after an epic offensive performance in the Rose Bowl. By that standard, almost every OC in the country is lacking in what it takes.

          What you’re really saying is that you don’t think Chaney’s the guy who can beat Alabama.

          Like

          • Corch Irvin Meyers New WR Corch

            I don’t believe Chaney is the guy who can beat Bama. Or Clemson. Or an LSU team with a great defense. Do you believe he is that guy? We’ve never seen it, anywhere in his career, that he is that guy.

            I thought he was a terrible hire in 2016 and still believe he is a mediocre OC and mostly bad in-game tactician today. The last two years he’s been the beneficiary of better talent than almost any other team he’s faced, but when faced with a team with similar or better talent on the defensive side of the ball, he’s the guy I thought he was when he was hired.

            Like

            • I don’t see how a mediocrity directs an offense performing at the level Georgia currently is at, statistically speaking. Your response to that is to dismiss statistical analysis. It’s kind of hard for me to bridge that gap to respond in an intelligent way to your questions.

              Like

          • Macallanlover

            I am not a Chamey fan, obvious from most all of my comments, but I also disagree that we will never win the title game in these playoffs with him in position. He was there last January and the criminally missed offsides on the punt block coast us that game, not Chaney. Now Chaney could have saved it, but chose to run some clock rather than let our two most productive offensive guys play with the ball late. How many times did we let Fromm or Sony bail us out in the last 10 minutes when we still had the lead, and could have used a few 1st downs, and/or points. So, Chamey may have played a supporting role (I suspect at Kirby’s direction), but we had the title in our hands. Hope the revenge tour gets its pound of flesh on Saturday. A little 2005, LSU-style beatdown should clear the path.

            Like

            • gastr1

              Even more, we’d have won if we could take advantage of a second-and-26 outside of field goal range. Good grief, Chaney didn’t cost us that.

              Like

        • Dawg19

          CIMNWRC…I bet you think Fields should be starting over Fromm, too, right?

          Like

        • I demand greatness from whatever it is you do for a living. I deserve it!

          Like

        • illini84

          You’re full of shit.

          Like

        • Silver Creek Dawg

          Enos was who Kirby wanted, but Bert was Smart enough to put a no-compete clause in his contract. He wasn’t available.

          Also, no Chaney, no Pittman. Are you still willing to make that trade?

          Like

          • Corch Irvin Meyers New WR Corch

            This is the new “who are we going to get that’s better than Mark Richt,” argument.

            Chaney and Pittman are friends, but are not a packaged deal. Pittman was the first offensive coach Kirby hired. The second offensive coach Kirby wanted to hire was Dan Enos. That means Sam Pittman was and is perfectly happy working with Dan Enos.

            Now can we end this particular stupid argument and get back to my stupid argument? 😉

            Like

    • stoopnagle

      So, I’m guessing you don’t buy the “jim Chaney: Offensive Consultant” line? That is, here’s just here to do what Kirby tells him. And to keep Pittman on staff. It may be that your problem isn’t so much Chaney as it is Kirby’s approach to offense.

      But I agree: if we can get Dan Enos here, that’s probably good.

      Like

      • Corch Irvin Meyers New WR Corch

        This argument is only slightly less dumb than the “Pittman will leave if Chaney leaves or is fired or is politely asked not to return” argument.

        We’ve seen many times this year where it’s pretty obvious that Chaney didn’t do what Kirby wanted, which means Chaney has a lot more to say about what the offense runs than just listening to what Kirby tells him.

        That makes him far more culpable for slamming Nick Chubb into Payne for less than one yard per carry in the fourth quarter of the Natty, costing us a national title.

        Like

  23. Doug

    Went back and looked — we’ve played CPJ’s triple option for 11 straight seasons, and of those 11 games, Saturday was indeed Tech’s lowest output both in terms of rushing yardage and in terms of total offense. So when you say you’ve never seen Georgia play a better game against the triple option, you literally haven’t.

    I knew it was going to be a fun day when, after stopping Tech’s second or third drive in its tracks, the defense was practically bouncing to the sidelines. When most teams go up against an option attack like that, even if they’ve just successfully killed a drive, they’re so worn out that they may give each other dap as they head back to the sideline but that’s it. Our defense, though, was jumping all over the place, as amped up as I’ve ever seen them. When your team can contend with Tech’s style of offense and still have that kind of energy afterward, you can definitely smell blood in the water.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. ApalachDawg

    This victory tasted sweet all the way in Copenhagen!

    Dansk er til hunde og til helvede med Tech!
    Danes are for the Dawgs and to Hell with Tech!

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Russ

    I’ll admit I was a little nervous going into this, in that I though Tech would break off some big plays against us and keep it sort of close. But Tucker and Kirby had that defense well prepared. Given our youth and the occasional lapses on containment, I thought we might give up some yards and plays, but it was a total beat down by the defense. And our offense was nearly perfect. It was a glorious day!

    Like

  26. 2675miller

    Incredible strategy on Defense by the Defensive staff. They played the guys who practiced best against the chop blocks. Herring and Barnett had 5 tackles each. Adam Anderson had 5 as well. A couple of tackles who have played a lot barely played. Just a brilliant strategy.

    Like

  27. jrod1229

    I think one underappreciated aspect to me of the entire game is Kirby used reserve defensive lineman who rarely see the field as starters. Malik Herring is probably never going to see extensive usage because he generally doesn’t fit what Kirby wants to do. Except against tech where he is big enough and agile enough to be a perfect fit. Just 3-d chess all over again.

    Like

  28. tbia

    One thing I did like was seeing their kickoff returners frustration over not getting another chance.

    Also, if you are a genius, you just returned one for a touchdown, wouldn’t you have Georgia rekick on the offsides?

    Like

  29. My understanding from listening to Kirby was that some of those short kickoffs especially last week were intentional.

    Like

  30. illini84

    They had to be. Also, tickets on Stub Hub have dropped below $300!

    Like

  31. illinidawg

    $275 now.

    Like

  32. CB

    I hate Tech, but I’m glad that targeting call was rescinded. If we start calling targeting on a face to face square up block then what’s next? Targeting on every offensive lineman on every run play?

    Like