No shit, Mark. Seems like there’s a way to change that.
Emmert added that the association does not believe the courts should decide what qualifies as a benefit tethered to education.
“We just find that an unworkable proposal that anytime you want to have a discussion over whether or not something is or isn’t tethered [to] education, we have to go back to a judge and have that debate and discussion. That just seems inherently inappropriate and not an appropriate role for the judiciary, but one that does fit the role of the NCAA,” Emmert said.
Eh, forget I mentioned it.