Dabo’s policy for ACC Media Days being what it is — no underclassmen — Trevor Lawrence won’t be in attendance. David Hale notes what a disappointment that must be for at least one party.
That new ACC Network isn’t gonna sell itself, you know.
Which brings me to today’s question: Lawrence clearly has promotional (i.e., commercial) value to a third party that doesn’t contribute a single thing to his academic experience. For the sake of argument, let’s say Dabo gets overruled, relents and directs Lawrence to appear (gratis, of course). Isn’t that an obvious case of exploitation?