Your 7.24.19 Playpen

Hey, kids, it’s Mueller Time!

You can follow his testimony live here, or you can simply wait for Trump’s gripping analysis on Twitter.

Promises to be a real shitshow, either way, I’m afraid.

168 Comments

Filed under GTP Stuff

168 responses to “Your 7.24.19 Playpen

  1. I’m not sure which will be the bigger $#!+ show … the Mueller hearings or the Playpen comment thread. I’m going to stay away from them both. 😉

    Liked by 4 people

    • Got Cowdog

      I can’t look away. It’s like a train derailing….

      Liked by 3 people

    • Argondawg

      Let me sum it up for you. Everybody on both sides of the aisle are assholes. Mueller seemed drunk or senile. Trump still a dickhead. This should cover pretty much the whole thing. I can’t believe we elected all of these dickheads. Truly the government we derserve.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Napoleon BonerFart

        Well, just ask Bernie about how fair the system is. Democrat voters wanted him in 2016 and the elites gave them Hillary instead.

        Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was fiction.

        Like

        • Democratic primary votes, 2016: Clinton 16,914,722; Sanders 13,206,428.

          Like

          • Napoleon BonerFart

            https://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421

            Maybe we should scrap the current political system so that blind adherence to nationwide popular vote totals is more legitimate.

            Like

            • Or, in the alternative, you could learn how to do math.

              Like

              • Napoleon BonerFart

                Well versed, thanks. How many regular delegates is a super delegate again? And what does the popular vote have to do with it? Just curious how your formulas work. Well know neo-con Donna Brazille seemed to think there were some shenanigans at play. She probably can’t do math either, amirite?

                Like

                • “Well, just ask Bernie about how fair the system is. Democrat voters wanted him in 2016 and the elites gave them Hillary instead.”

                  Except, you know, for all those pesky actual votes cast.

                  I know nothing about Brazile’s math skills, but, in her defense, she managed a losing Presidential campaign that had no business losing.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Dude, if you want to pretend that the Democratic primary was fair for all candidates, go ahead. But I’ve got no interest in participating in your delusion. Hillary bought the nomination before primary season.

                  I’m sorry she lost. You have my sympathies.

                  Like

                • I’m not taking issue with anything but your “Democratic voters preferred”. You have no clue, other than Donna Brazile, it seems.

                  Like

  2. dawgxian

    Here’s Omar talking about deporting an opponent. Guess she’s a racist https://twitter.com/ilhanmn/status/254078504898011136?s=21

    Liked by 1 person

    • Derek

      Lets assume (wrongly) for the sake of argument that you aren’t a bunch of troglodyte racists and what concerns you is loyalty to the USA:

      First why doesn’t: “Russia if you’re listening, find and release Hillary’s emails, you’ll be richly rewarded” bother you? If Biden said: “hey Iran, help me win the election and you’ll be rewarded” would that be difficult to call treason?

      Second, why don’t you go out and find each and every confederate symbol and tell the owner to get their traitorous ass out of the fucking country? Then tell the legislators and governors of every southern state that honors and celebrates confederate treason to get the fuck out too.

      The difference between Lee and Davis and Osama? Several hundred thousand dead Americans. But you’re the patriots right?

      Fuck you all very much.

      You’ve defended treason for 160 years, what’s another day right? Enjoy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • spur21

        Haters gonna hate

        Like

      • Corch Irvin Meyers New USC Trojans Corch (2020)

        Excuse me, Sir. This is a Wendy’s.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dawgxian

        Wasn’t the whole point of secession to “get the hell out”?

        Like

        • Derek

          And among those who are still honoring that “point” I invite them to do likewise. Fuck off!!

          Or,in the alternative and at a minimum, judge other Americans under the same standards you apply to you’re own, without consideration of color or religious beliefs. Is that so fucking hard?

          Like

        • CB

          Not really. They were trying to stay and take the land.

          Like

      • Voice of Reason 1776

        Someone is having a bad morning. I hope it gets better. I’m guessing you have graduated from college in the last 10-15 years by the tone of your comments. Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson et al were great patriots, all.

        They certainly were racists by the current definition as were about 95% of all Americans on whichever side they were on in The War between the States from the standpoint that almost everyone at the time thought white Europeans were superior to black Africans. Thankfully, that view has changed for almost everyone now.

        Yes, from a macro view the war was fought over slavery since, without that one wedge issue, the war wouldn’t have happened. That said, the combatants who fought for the Confederacy from the generals to the privates were not fighting for slavery. We know why they fought because back then, people knew how to write and they did write copiously. Please go read, not the drivel coming out of university professors in the last 25-30 years but the things written in the late 1800’s by the people who fought the war.

        When I was a younger man and Dixie was played at the high school football games and people stood and some even shed a tear, were they nostalgic for slavery? No, of course not. The confederate symbols had nothing to do with racism and everything about regional pride for a part of the country that had been soundly humiliated but still held it’s head high.

        Concerning the topic of the day, Trump is certainly a pompous windbag but the whole Mueller investigation was a partisan joke. There was not and is not any evidence that Trump tried to work with the Russians to get elected so he could then help the Russians in return. Trump is the same guy he has always been, arrogant, bombastic, a risk-taking “swing-for-the-fences” guy who sometimes strikes out completely. His personality, character and political views haven’t changed except for social issues that he only cares about to get political support from the right.

        My using the word friend was not sarcastic, unlike the Trump quote you mentioned about getting the Russians to look at Hillary’s emails. I genuinely enjoy talking with people who have different views as long as it is an exchange of ideas and not emotions. Have a good day.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Derek

          Tl;dr.

          The point isn’t anything but hypocrisy. Pure and simple.

          I’m happy for you to justify the rebellion. I’m happy for you to approve of the fact that Alabama had 3 state holidays dedicated to the confederacy and it’s “heroes” in 2019. I’m happy for you say that Forrest should be honored in Tennessee in 2019. Fine with me. You’re entitled to your opinion.

          What I object to are people on the one hand celebrating the most treasonous and consequential actions in this nations history deciding who can and can’t stay.

          For if the standard is loyalty to the USA you fuckers should be on the first boat out. Or hold yourself to the same American standards that we can all have a voice in the country without our patriotism being challenged over disagreements and stfu about who is and who isn’t a loyal American.

          Like

          • Napoleon BonerFart

            Just curious, but would your encouragement to leave include an open invitation to return, like Trump’s tweet? Or is your outrage too much for such trivial details?

            Like

        • Ray Goff

          Let’s be clear. It was the War of Northern Aggression. What is this War between the States you speak of?

          Like

        • olddpunk

          Lee, Jackson, et al took up arms against their country and killed American soldiers. That makes them traitors, not patriots. Period.

          Like

      • Without a doubt one of the stupidest comments ever written. Your mind and your soul are sick.

        Like

  3. Corch Irvin Meyers New USC Trojans Corch (2020)

    Nah. I’m good.

    Like

  4. Heyberto

    Am I one of the only ones that doesn’t care? I’ll read the lowlights this evening.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. illini84

    I can’t wait till they start besmirching Mueller.

    Like

  6. NCDawg

    Someone please take his Twitter away!!

    Like

  7. Classic City Canine

    Can’t wait for Derek and chili to spend the whole day showing their asses…

    Looks like Derek is already hard at work.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. TC405

    It was a hoax. Full stop.

    Why is that so hard for people to understand?

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Rick

    Wow, Republicans aren’t even bothering to argue that Trump is innocent.

    Really hope D’s drill down on Trump’s Campaign Chairman (Manafort) continually and secretly feeding internal polling data and campaign strategy to one of Putin’s closest oligarch via a known Russian Intelligence Officer, and never being able to establish why or whether Trump knew because Trump successfully dangled pardons to him to keep him from flipping to this day. How many Americans are aware of this? Maybe 5%?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Napoleon BonerFart

      It’s uninteresting because it’s just the latest smoking gun in a long line of smoking guns that are definitely, for sure, this time we mean it, proving the Russia collusion narrative.

      But it reads like something out of the Da Vinci Code. IF Trump knew that Manafort gave private polling data to Ukrainians, and IF the Ukrainians passed the data to the Russians who then passed it to a private company that used the data to illegally direct campaign spending, etc., etc., then Trump COULD be guilty of a civil infraction. But IF he knew more about campaign finance law, it MIGHT be a criminal violation. And IF Trump tried to cover it up, THEN he MIGHT be guilty of obstruction.

      Of course, none of this was proved. It’s just an interesting theory that fits some of the evidence. Kind of like how Jesus Christ MIGHT have fathered a blood line that became French kings and Knights Templar and whatever. It’s a juicy story as long as one doesn’t scrutinize it too closely.

      Even the main source of the election “interference” of IRA, hasn’t been linked to the Russian government. Mueller was chided in court for suggesting such without evidence. And even if it were true, IRA spent about $46k on ads before the election. That’s the threat to democracy? Trump and Russia colluded through bag men and intermediaries so that Russia could spend a whopping $46k to influence the election?

      Yawn.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Rick

        Manafort gave private polling data to Ukrainians

        Russians.

        Konstantin Kilimnik has been employed as Russian Intelligence Officer. Oleg Deripaska, to whom Manafort instructed Kilimnik to give the data, is Russian, and one of Vladimir Putin’s closest confidants.

        Like

        • Napoleon BonerFart

          Liked by 2 people

          • tenesseewasnevergreat

            I had to make an account just to stand in awe of what I just witnessed. A Russiagate Truther passionately complains that on 5% of the American public is aware of the fact that Manafort fed Trump campaign info to the Russians. You corrected him, pointing out that the allegation was that he shared the info with Ukranians. He insisted it was Russians, and then you posted the FakeNews retraction admitting that the Manafort-Russian story was wrong. It’s just… poetic. I’m sure that Rick is scouring the internet for a new place to hang his Russian Conspiracy hat right now. What else is he supposed to do with all of the pent-up rage about the Bad Orange Man? The TV claims he is Hitler reincarnate, after all!

            Liked by 1 person

  10. Kevin

    I guess the new standard today is 1)accuse someone of a crime 2)investigate the crime, then 3) when there is NO evidence of guilt, state publicly that the target has not been totally exonerated. Go DAWGS!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Jack Klompus

    I refer all of you to the report.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. TimberRidgeDawg

    Robert Mueller’s Day Off…

    Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to right
    Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Slawdawg

    Planning for the Cocktail Party this year: what’s the deal with Amelia Island? I’ve never been.
    Was looking at St. Simons and Jekyll b/c that’s comfy and I’m used to those, but the Senator and co. seem to prefer Amelia. Can y’all give me the scoop?

    Like

    • PTC DAWG

      Don’t go, too crowded…

      Honestly, the Villas at Amelia Island are the way to go. Downtown Fernandina is nice too. A little closer to Jax when the time comes too.

      Honestly, your question is a breath of fresh air amongst this hog pen of comments.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Slawdawg

        Yes I’ve been referring to the playpen as the pigpen as well.
        Are the villas part of Omni property?

        Like

        • PTC DAWG

          Sort of…just google Villa’s at Amelia Island. You can get a golf view 2 BR/2 BA for around $200 per night…

          IF you go, you can Uber into downtown Fernandina, bars/restaurants/some shopping etc there…lots of UGA fans. Salty Pelican on the waterfront is one of my favorites in that area.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Normaltown Mike

          I was just at the Omni for a CLE and enjoyed it (had never been to Amelia). I had a “villa” which is really a condo on the Omni property owned by an individual but is rented through the Omni. It was relatively inexpensive for the time of year, etc.

          Had a great meal at Down Under which is under the bridge from mainland to Fernandina. Got to see a railroad swivel bridge in motion which was pretty neat.

          Like

  14. spur21

    Nadler is nothing more than a self serving piece of shit as is ole bug-eyed “I have proof” Schiff.
    I love watching them throw shit on the wall hoping something will stick all while knowing full well they have NOTHING.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Derek

      I love it

      Russia if you’re listening!

      “I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.“

      Trump on 5.30.19 at 6:57:47

      Nothing to worry about. Unless you’re an American. Good day traitor.

      Like

      • Napoleon BonerFart

        Copy pasta for the win! Thanks for cracking the case wide open, Derek. Just more proof the Mueller is a Russian spy because he didn’t put the smoking gun tweet in his report!

        FWIW, also Trump just after tweeting the above:
        “No, Russia did not help me get elected. You know who got me elected? I got me elected. Russia didn’t help me at all.”

        Do we trust Trump? Or Trump? Is it plausible that he clarified a misstatement? Or that he intentionally admitted a crime just to rub conspiracy theorists’ noses in it? Only deranged middle schoolers know for sure.

        Liked by 3 people

        • UGADrake

          I’m amazed that Derek hasn’t been called before the House Committee today (or any other day) to offer his keen insight and intelligence. It is so refreshing that on this humble blog, Derek imparts such wisdom to us.

          Also. How’s that going with Erica Thomas Derek? That Trump’s fault she lied? Yeah. I thought so.
          Life is so easy when you can blame everyone else for your problems.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Athenshomerdawg

            After Clinton’s stunning defeat, Russian “collusion”—thanks initially to efforts by Obama holdover Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates to go after Michael Flynn and the successful attempts of the CIA and FBI to seed the bogus Steele dossier among the government elite—became a club to destroy the incoming Trump Administration.

            How ironic that Russian “collusion” was used as a preemptive charge from those who actually had colluded with Russians for all sorts for financial and careerist advantages.

            Liked by 3 people

        • This is what gets me. Most of us know that a lot of Trump’s tweets are meant to tweak the opposition. It seems that the more fervent of the opposition have no ability to recognize this and then proceed to almost burst a blood vessel. It’s funny, really.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Kevin

        I know Russia certainly influenced my vote!

        Liked by 2 people

  15. I can’t be the only one who realizes that Trump’s tweets are not from him, but from his staff, and are well thought out in order to best deliver his administrations intended message. You guys know he doesn’t do this shit a night from his bed while next to Melania right? I doubt he even knows how to use a smart phone. Why would he.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Jeffrey's Black Book

    Over/Under on timeline for Epstein being suicided?

    That POS has a lot of info that a lot of elites (across the political spectrum) don’t want out, and I don’t think he makes it through 2019.

    Like

  17. Derek

    If any of you traitors are wondering, yes, I’m enjoying the rent free space in your heads.

    It is quite roomy and breezy in there.

    Enjoy your continued DDS, traitors.

    https://traveltips.usatoday.com/russias-immigration-laws-63671.html

    Sign up now and join Agolf Shitler later. I’m sure GRU can make use of you idiots.

    Like

  18. Chris

    Well a Clinton is involved, so an Arkancide is a real possibility. 2 shots in the back of the head while falling down some stairs.

    Like

  19. Chris

    Please let us know how we can help you continue to spread your message as much as possible.

    Best Regards,
    President Trump’s 2020 Re-Election Campaign

    Liked by 1 person

  20. CB

    To put it simply, Donald Trump is innocent of collusion with Russia in the same sense that Hillary Clinton is innocent of gross negligence regarding her handling of classified emails. Basically an OJ Simpson level of innocence.

    If it weren’t for their positions of power they would both be in jail. Period. #LockThemUp

    Like

    • Napoleon BonerFart

      If only someone could conduct an investigation to uncover Trump’s crimes. A prosecutor, yes, but perhaps even a “special” prosecutor. Then we could prove how Trump, Putin, and an international cabal conspired to spend $46,000 on Facebook ads to steal Hillary’s election.

      Trigger alert. The following is a Russian meme that could lead to the fall of Western democracy if too many people view it. Please wash your eyes with bleach after viewing. Especially you, Derek. You have been warned.

      Liked by 1 person

      • CB

        If only the office of the presidency didn’t shield Trump from being charged for the obstruction of justice that was uncovered.

        As I said he and Hillary are both equally innocent/guilty. I’ll let you decide for yourself as to the extent.

        Nice meme btw. I especially like how the losing army of the racist south is promptly represented in the background for seemingly no reason. This is Russian MAGA to the core lol. I gotta give them this, they know their target audience better than most.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Napoleon BonerFart

          Yeah. As I said, I’m no big fan of process crimes. If Trump actually schemed with Russia to win the election, lock him up. Just as Hillary actually schemed to keep her emails private to avoid FOIA requests.

          But not cooperating with investigations just doesn’t raise my hackles that much.

          And yeah, memes perpetuating the righteous cause myth of the Civil War are always a crowd pleaser. It’s imagery like that that works up Brennan, Clapper, et al to come up with insurance policies in case the wrong candidate wins.

          Like

          • CB

            “Just as Hillary actually schemed to keep her emails private to avoid FOIA requests.

            So you’re saying that Hillary’s lack of cooperation doesn’t raise your hackles right?

            Like

            • Napoleon BonerFart

              In terms of obstruction, I think her destroying evidence is worse than Trump considering pardoning someone, or trying to fire Mueller. But it’s still just a process crime. Prosecute her for keeping the private server, or let it go.

              Like

              • CB

                Or actually firing Comey, or refusing to be interviewed by the FBI, or publicly contemplating a self pardon, or encouraging/intimidating others to not cooperate with Mueller’s investigation.

                I swear Trump supporters would pay him $20 to tea bag their own mothers, and frame a picture of it lol.

                Liked by 1 person

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Not a crime, not a crime, not a crime.

                  Remember when Susan McDougal sat in jail for 18 months rather than answer questions about the Clintons, and then Bill pardoned her? I’m guessing you were outraged at Bill’s actions, right?

                  I have said. If Trump is guilty of an actual crime, then get him. But making leftists cry isn’t a crime. And bending over so that Brennan, Clapper, and Comey can spend years trying to gin up something to hang on him isn’t required.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • CB

                  I was in middle school during the Clinton era, and I was raised in the conservative south so I’m sure I was outraged by Clinton’s actions strictly by proxy, much in the same way bay you support Trump. Idk who Susan McDougal is.

                  I’m not interested in the semantics of how each side of the aisle chooses to interpret the Law. Clinton mishandled classified information. Trump obstructed justice and at the very least he attempted to collude with Russia. They should both be in jail.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  I’m not a Trump supporter. I’m just not someone who lets Rachel Maddow get me into a lather on how Donald Trump is literally Hitler. Maybe Trump tried to collude with Russia. It’s a pretty outlandish idea. But I haven’t seen any real evidence of it. And Mueller’s investigation didn’t turn up much that was solid. So all we’ve got are hints and innuendo and Derek’s favorite tweet that he breaks out 17 times per playpen.

                  Obstruction is different. As I’ve said, I’m not a real fan of process crimes. Clinton seems to have committed obstruction by destroying evidence. But Trump firing Comey wasn’t obstruction. As president, he gets to hire and fire people in his administration for any reason, or no reason. Comey wasn’t in a union. And Trump promising a pardon isn’t really a crime, either. It’s his prerogative.

                  At this point, Trump’s greatest crimes seems to be driving leftists nuts and depriving Hillary of her birthright. That doesn’t even make him a bad guy. It certainly doesn’t make him a Russian agent or a criminal.

                  Like

                • CB

                  The fact that you aren’t even marginally concerned about why a sitting president would want to fire an FBI director speaks volumes about who you support. Those might be the rules, but they are exceptionally dumb rules. If Obama did the same you’d be throwing a perpetual shit fit.

                  Attempted murder is a crime. Possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute is a crime. So why would attempted collusion with a hostile foreign government be a crime? What’s worse selling a few pills or committing treason?

                  I’ve never once watched Maddow, but I’m starting to think this is Tucker Carlson’s account.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • LOL.

                  When they say, “I’m not a Trump supporter”…

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Let your curiosity flow. It’s just not a crime to fire an FBI director. Especially when the AG and deputy AG recommend doing it. Especially when the FBI director is a grandstanding leaker hostile to your administration.

                  Again, get Trump on collusion, or attempted collusion, or considered collusion, or wished upon a star collusion if you can. But don’t join the leftist mob in being so sure that Trump is a traitor that, when you can’t find evidence of it, you go looking for crimes from his tax returns from 20 years ago, or you try to criminalize legitimate acts of a sitting president. That’s not how the rule of law is supposed to work.

                  Like

                • CB

                  I gotcha, but if it’s Obama’s birth certificate then it’s a problem. Say what you want about fairness or whether or not something is a crime, but at the very least Mueller is giving Trump a dose of his own bullshit and it’s well deserved after being the champion of the birther movement even if all of this is just a shit ton of blinding smoke with somehow no fire.

                  In any event, with that line of thinking deleting emails off of your own private server isn’t a crime. Why would Hillary want to delete them? Doesn’t matter just like it doesn’t matter why Trump would want to fire Comey on the advice of two of his own croney yes men. Sure Trump was coming under fire for possible collusion, but it’s not against the law so…

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Expand your mind, Bluto. Politics is bigger than #OrangeManBad vs MAGA.

                  Like

                • CB

                  Morals and research lol. Info Wars and QAnon don’t count as research.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  I’m not arguing Trump isn’t an asshole. I’m just pointing out that he’s not a criminal. If you believe that settling political scores, especially against Republicans, is a legitimate function of the DOJ, I’ll just agree to disagree.

                  And I’m not arguing that obstruction isn’t a crime. I’m pointing out that it’s a process crime that doesn’t get me excited. Process crimes often create criminals where none existed before. If a cop thinks you have drugs, roughs you up, can’t find any, and arrests you for resisting arrest, justice wasn’t served. Similarly, if the best the leftists can do is complain that Trump didn’t cooperate enough with the effort to impeach him, I’m not impressed.

                  FWIW, my primary political stance is that people should leave others alone. Don’t initiate aggression against others. Respect their property rights. It’s amusing that you dismiss positions stemming from these basic tenets as crackpot QAnon stuff. I guess perpetual war and the rule of the elites is what sophisticated thinkers prefer, eh?

                  Like

                • CB

                  That would all be well and good, but you’re not applying the same standard to democrats as evidenced by your strong stance against Hillary who has been accused and never charged of high level negligence as opposed to the much greater crime (imo) of treason and conspiring with a foreign government.

                  If you’re even marginally paying attention it’s been made clear that Trump obstructed justice but can’t be charged on the technicality that he’s the president. That is a crime, and whether or not it excites you is irrelevant. You love the law, Trump broke it.

                  Anyway, if you were to shrug both Hillary and Trump’s investigations off as much ado about nothing then we might be able to take you seriously, but you’ve quite clearly chosen a side, and therefore you are QAnon troll masquerading as some kind of libertarian.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  You’re the inconsistent one. I say lock Hillary up for her illegal server. Don’t get her on failing to cooperate with the investigation into her illegal server. There is a difference that you’re failing to grasp. If Trump colluded, lock him up. Don’t lock him up for not cooperating with the investigation, or for legally firing a hostile FBI director, or for tweeting mean things about AOC.

                  I have been marginally paying attention to the investigation. And I see stories corrected and bombshells walked back. So we’re back to hints and innuendo. And you’re the one peddling it. Trump must have known that a low level staffer’s sister’s barber is a Russian troll who coordinated to spend 0.05% as much on ads as the campaigns did. Lock him up.

                  I’m the guy requesting evidence. And you call me a troll. #irony

                  Like

                • CB

                  Read carefully troll. Hillary used an illegal server. Trump obstructed justice. Both are proven facts and are also crimes. They should both be in jail.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Repetition doesn’t equal truth. Claiming that firing Comey is obstruction doesn’t make it so. Trump is authorized by the Constitution to fire Comey. I’m still amused that insisting on evidence is “trolling.” Don’t worry, you can get your fix of Maddow tonight and I’m sure she’ll be super triggered over the mean stuff that Trump could legally do. But we shouldn’t care about the law. We should only care about sticking it to Republicans, right?

                  Like

                • CB

                  Oh, I see what’s going on here meme troll. Reread my most recent comment for the part about Comey that doesn’t exist. I’m interested in the Comey situation and you’re not. That’s fine and also irrelevant to my point that I told you to read carefully.

                  The appointed special counsel concluded that Trump obstructed justice therefore according to the law he did so and would be indicted if not for being shielded by the DOJ. That is a crime therefore you want Trump imprisoned. Congratulations for making it so easy to destroy you.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  You continue to be full of shit. Here is the Mueller report’s statement on obstruction. “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

                  It’s telling how you can read the above statement and interpret it as exactly the opposite of what it clearly states. Only a first class Rachel Maddow acolyte can believe that, when Mueller doesn’t conclude Trump committed a crime, that means Mueller proved Trump committed a crime. A precious case of TDS.

                  This one’s for you.

                  Like

                • CB

                  How do you read Trump’s “EXONERATED” tweets? How does your Trump mind interpret that well thought out soliloquy?

                  Your ebaumsworld meme cannot be found troll. Pretty sure you said elsewhere on this thread that Mueller was a rambling senile old man, but now his report is your prized piece of evidence LOL. This is why I love trolls. So easy to dominate, and they always keep coming back for more.

                  Anyway, if you’re interested in what Mueller has to say about it here you go.

                  Lieu – “I believe a reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met, and I’d like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC (the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel) opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

                  Mueller – “That is correct.”

                  BTW I really just started looking into this stuff yesterday. Turns out it isn’t complicated at all, but for some reason Trump Trolls can’t wrap their head around the fact that the only thing keeping him from prison is the OLC technicality.

                  via MEME

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Another one for you.

                  Like

                • Ldawg

                  #whataboutism

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  #NotAnArgument

                  I’m simply being consistent. If Trump considering pardons is impeachable, so is Clinton’s actual pardoning of a business partner who sat in jail rather than go on the record about Clinton’s actions be impeachable.

                  Personally, I think neither one is impeachable. But I’m not an hysterical leftist whose only political thought is #OrangeManBad.

                  Like

                • Napoleon BonerFart

                  Keep beating that dead horse. Mueller’s report is the definitive work on Trump’s alleged collusion and obstruction. It’s adorable that you think your 10 minutes of Rachel Maddow on YouTube has uncovered more than the team of investigators with subpoena power.

                  Just keep stating that Trump is a criminal. He’s has definitely, for sure, committed vague and nameless crimes that investigators can’t quite gather the evidence for. But they probably haven’t tried your whole speaking it into existence approach. Good job.

                  Like

  21. Cecil Mashburn

    Well I hate this. You had to get political. I always enjoyed your column. Won’t read you again.

    Like

  22. HiAltDawg

    A change of subject FYI, I saw Michael Davenport painting by the Westside Publix this morning so it looks like he’s back at it after being attacked a couple weeks ago.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. If Mueller were my father I’d take his keys….yesterday.

    Like

  24. Ldawg

    “Maybe Trump tried to collude with Russia. It’s a pretty outlandish idea. But I haven’t seen any real evidence of it.” -Napoleon B.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4809881/rep-adam-schiff-questions-robert-mueller

    00:00:00
    Robert S. Mueller III
    [Ending opening statement …] whether the President committed a crime. And with that, Mr. Chairman, I’m ready to answer questions.

    00:00:07
    Rep. Adam Schiff

    Thank you, Director Mueller. I recognize myself for five minutes. Director Mueller your report describes a sweeping effort by Russia to influence…

    00:00:19
    Mueller

    That’s correct.

    00:00:20
    Schiff

    And during the course of this Russian interference in the election, the Russians made outreach to the Trump campaign. did they not?

    00:00:28
    Mueller

    That occurred over the course of — yeah, that occurred.

    00:00:32
    Schiff

    It’s also clear from your report that during that Russian outreach to the Trump campaign, no one associated with the Trump campaign ever called the…

    00:00:44
    Mueller

    I don’t know that for sure.

    00:00:47
    Schiff

    In fact, the campaign welcomed the Russian help, did they not?

    00:00:51
    Mueller

    I think we report in our — in the report indications that that occurred, yes.

    00:00:56
    Schiff

    The President’s son said when he was approached about dirt on Hillary Clinton that the Trump campaign would love it.

    00:01:03
    Mueller

    That is generally what was said, yes.

    00:01:06
    Schiff

    The President himself called on the Russians to hack Hillary’s emails?

    00:01:10
    Mueller

    There was a statement by the President in those general lines.

    00:01:15
    Schiff

    Numerous times during the campaign the President praised the releases of the Russian-hacked emails through wikileaks.

    00:01:22
    Mueller

    That did occur.

    00:01:25
    Schiff

    Your report found that the Trump campaign planned, quote, a press strategy, communications campaign and messaging, unquote, based on that Russian…

    00:01:34
    Mueller

    I am not familiar with that.

    00:01:36
    Schiff

    That language comes from volume one, page 54. Apart from the Russian’s wanting to help Trump win, several individuals associated with the Trump…

    00:01:53
    Mueller

    That is true.

    00:01:54
    Schiff

    Paul Manafort was trying to make money or achieve debt forgiveness from a Russian oligarch?

    00:02:02
    Mueller

    That’s generally accurate.

    00:02:04
    Schiff

    Flynn was trying to make money from Turkey?

    00:02:06
    Mueller

    True.

    00:02:07
    Schiff

    Donald Trump was trying to make millions from a real estate deal in Moscow.

    00:02:12
    Mueller

    To the extent you’re talking about the hotel deal in Moscow?

    00:02:15
    Schiff

    Yes.

    00:02:16
    Mueller

    Yes.

    00:02:18
    Schiff

    When your investigation looked into these matters, numerous people lied —

    00:02:22
    Mueller

    Number of persons that we interviewed in our investigation it turns out did lie.

    00:02:28
    Schiff

    Mike Flynn lied?

    00:02:29
    Mueller

    He was convicted of lying, yes.

    00:02:32
    Schiff

    George Papadopoulos was convicted of lying?

    00:02:37
    Mueller

    Yes.

    00:02:38
    Schiff

    Paul Manafort went so far as to encourage other people to lie.

    00:02:43
    Mueller

    That’s accurate.

    00:02:44
    Schiff

    Rick Gates lied?

    00:02:45
    Mueller

    That’s accurate.

    00:02:47
    Schiff

    Michael Cohen, the President’s lawyer was indicted for lying?

    00:02:50
    Mueller

    True.

    00:02:51
    Schiff

    He lied to stay on message with the President?

    00:02:55
    Mueller

    Allegedly by him.

    00:02:56
    Schiff

    And when Donald Trump called your investigation a witch hunt, that was also false, was it not?

    00:03:01
    Mueller

    I’d like to think so, yes.

    00:03:04
    Schiff

    Well, your investigation is not a witch hunt, is it?

    00:03:06
    Mueller

    It is not a witch hunt.

    00:03:07
    Schiff

    When the President said the Russian interference was a hoax, that was false, wasn’t it?

    00:03:12
    Mueller

    True.

    00:03:12
    Schiff

    When he said it publicly it was false?

    00:03:17
    Mueller

    He did say publicly that it was false, yes.

    00:03:21
    Schiff

    And when he told it to Putin, that was false too, wasn’t it?

    00:03:25
    Mueller

    That I’m not familiar with.

    00:03:26
    Schiff

    When the President said he had no business dealings with Russia, that was false, wasn’t it?

    00:03:31
    Mueller

    I’m not going to go into the details of the report along these loans [lines].

    00:03:39
    Schiff

    When the President said he had no business dealings with Russia he was seeking to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, was he not?

    00:03:46
    Mueller

    I think there’s some question about when this was accomplished.

    00:03:50
    Schiff

    You would consider a billion dollar deal to build a tower in Moscow to be business dealings, wouldn’t you?

    00:03:59
    Mueller

    Absolutely.

    00:03:59
    Schiff

    In short, your investigation found evidence that Russia want to help Trump win the election

    00:04:05
    Mueller

    I think generally that would be accurate.

    00:04:08
    Schiff

    Russia informed campaign officials of that?

    00:04:11
    Mueller

    I’m not certain to what conversation you’re referring to.

    00:04:15
    Schiff

    Well, through an intermediary they informed Papadopoulos they could help with the unanimous release of stolen emails?

    00:04:23
    Mueller

    Accurate.

    00:04:25
    Schiff

    Russia committed federal crimes to help Donald Trump?

    00:04:27
    Mueller

    When you’re talking about the computer crimes charged in our case, absolutely.

    00:04:32
    Schiff

    The Trump campaign officials built their strategy, their messaging strategy around the stolen documents?

    00:04:35
    Mueller

    Generally, that’s true.

    00:04:40
    Schiff

    And then they lied to cover it up?

    00:04:45
    Mueller

    Generally, that’s true.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Napoleon BonerFart

      Blah, blah, blah. A politician grandstanding with a befuddled old man as a prop isn’t evidence. Mueller wasn’t familiar with Fusion GPS. 🙂

      The actual report stated there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute Trump. The report written by a one-sided staff hostile to Trump, who was given years and tens of millions of dollars and subpoena power, couldn’t turn up the evidence.

      So, by all means, keep agitating that a lack of evidence is actually evidence. That Trump must prove a negative to establish his innocence. That a real estate tycoon trying to build a hotel is criminal. Good luck to you. I just don’t see it going anywhere. And I sure don’t see it heading to impeachment, or establishing collusion.

      Like

    • Derek

      He could shoot a man on 5th Avenue and not lose a vote.
      In fact, they’d say he’s innocent.

      Hoax!! Witch hunt!! Fake video!! Fake confession!! False flag!! They faked it all!!

      Presenting these traitorous idiots facts is about as valuable as reading a cat Shakespeare.

      Like

      • Napoleon BonerFart

        Exactly. Our altruistic government bureaucrats wouldn’t lie to us. Not again. Not about something so important. Never question authority. Whether it’s fbi directors or middle school teachers.

        Like

  25. By the way, this is fucking hilarious.

    Liked by 2 people