Second-year bump got bumped.

Small sample size, I know, but this was another interesting development from Week One:

No doubt some of that can be chalked up to typical opening week sloppiness, but you have to wonder if more than a few fault lines were opened up.  In any event, if the second-year effect is all that (and, for what it’s worth, I do tend to give that credence), that set of results sure didn’t show it.



Filed under College Football, What's Bet In Vegas Stays In Vegas

5 responses to “Second-year bump got bumped.

  1. Ben

    Tennessee apologists are saying Pruitt doesn’t have any players, but I tend to think it’s because he’s a terrible head coach.

    The guy doesn’t seem to know /anything/ about anything other than football, but sometimes people still want to pick something off the Saban tree, even if it’s not any good.


    • Cojones

      The players I saw on D continue to make my jaw drop open and not in a good way. They looked like they didn’t give a shit, not from being substandard players, but from substandard play.


    • W Cobb Dawg

      Maybe Pruitt will start a behind-the-scenes campaign to dump the a.d. That worked so well before…


  2. DaddyRichATL

    So Dan Mullen lost to Miami by 4 points? What alternate universe did that happen in 2019?