2019 Mumme Poll, Week 13

Screenshot_2019-09-30 (1) Senator Blutarsky ( MummePoll) Twitter Mostly the same this week.

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 Mumme Poll - (Responses)

Based on past history, I’ve been dreading a drop off in participation, which we had avoided so far, but it finally came this week, as only 221 folks cast votes.  That’s still pretty good, compared to what happened before, but I hope you guys can stick around for the last two weeks of voting.

Average number of teams per ballot also fell, to 6.6.  Given the lateness of the season, that isn’t a surprise.  Nor is this:

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 Mumme Poll - (Responses)(1)

Here’s the breakdown by conference:

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 Mumme Poll - (Responses)(2)

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 Mumme Poll - (Responses)(3)

“Where we from” is also unchanged — 62% of the voters are from Georgia.

Finally, here’s how this week’s bonus question shook out:

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 Mumme Poll - (Responses)(4)

As usual, here’s how last night’s selection committee rankings look:

Screenshot_2019-11-27 2019 College Football Rankings for Week 14 ESPN(1)

Random thoughts and speculation:

  • Our Tier 1 (teams appearing on at least 90% of voters’ ballots) remains at three, but there’s more separation between Tier 1 and the rest of the field, as Georgia’s support dropped a little from Week 12.
  • We and the selection committee swapped numbers one and two, but otherwise match through the top nine picks.
  • Speaking of which, I can’t speak for the selection committee, but our assessment of the quality of the field really drops off after nine.
  • Using our votes to devise a four-team playoff field is clear, but for eight teams, not quite so much, as Minnesota and Baylor are close.  That should be clarified with their next games.

16 Comments

Filed under GTP Stuff

16 responses to “2019 Mumme Poll, Week 13

  1. Timphd

    The most surprising thing about the ballots to me is that of the 221, two did not include LSU, three did not include Ohio St and seven didn’t include Clemson. Some people must be hard to convince! Those are the only three teams I DID include on my ballot.

    Like

    • DaveinAZ

      FWIW. I had only two teams – OSU and LSU. Left Clemson off because of their lack of quality wins and their performance against UNC. Clemson’s performance in their win over UNC was essentially no different than our loss to SC. At least we have three quality wins – but our Offense…

      Like

  2. piper

    did a reminder email go out this week? i didn’t see one and forgot to do it this week. maybe i just missed it, but that might have something to do with the drop in participation.

    Like

  3. Hogbody Spradlin

    I know it’s been said more than once, but that website is clunky. Lag made me quit.

    Like

  4. Faulkner

    Preparation for extended family turkey bender at my place. Completely forgot.

    Like

  5. Again, I included teams I thought would deserve to play in the CFP if:

    1) CFP had no limit on teams
    2) Season ended today
    3) CFP selections made today

    My teams:

    Alabama
    Clemson
    Georgia
    LSU
    Ohio State
    Oklahoma

    Like

  6. What would really be the shits (for the national media dipsticks including Mickey)…IF tosu or clempsun were to lose this weekend or their conference championship game…jumping the bammers into the top 4 (lsu loses but only falls one spot and UGA continues their winning ways)

    Like

  7. jhorne2000

    We seem like a pretty fair bunch given the geography bias , but – the huge drop off between UGA and Bama doesn’t seem right.

    Liked by 1 person