Mel Tucker hot take #2

Stewart Mandel’s observation from his Mailbag ($$) got me to thinking about one possible reaction to the new financial reality of college football.

To be clear, conference money is only one contributor to an athletic department’s finances, along with ticket sales, merchandising and donations. Colorado’s total athletic department revenue in 2017-18 was $89 million, per USA Today. Even if you gave the Buffs a Big Ten payout, they’d still massively trail Michigan State’s $145 million take.

But those extra dollars from the conference can help plug a lot of holes.

My 180-degree turn about the impact of revenue gaps was shaped in part by covering LSU’s national title run last season. The benefits of being in a conference that recently announced $44.6 million-per-school distributions were on full display with the remarkable support structure at the heart of Ed Orgeron’s program. LSU last season employed 15 off-field analysts, plus graduate assistants and “consultants.” Former USC and NFL head coach John Robinson was on the payroll. So was longtime Power 5 defensive coordinator Kevin Cosgrove. Analyst Jorge Munoz worked so closely with Joe Burrow he was invited to the Heisman ceremony. (Munoz is now the receivers coach at Baylor.)

LSU’s staff directory currently lists 12 individuals with the title of “analyst.” Colorado’s lists three with the comparable title of “director of quality control.” And that’s without getting into the small army of nutritionists, performance coaches and myriad other behind-the-scenes figures.

I know Mark Emmert’s wet dream is to get an antitrust exemption, but that ain’t gonna happen.  Schools aren’t going to be able to collude to prevent Tucker-like contracts going forward, much to Jimmy Sexton’s pleasure.  But putting a lid on the facilities race?  Yeah, I can see conferences banding together to limit what the Big Ten and SEC can do with the money gush flowing their way.

4 Comments

Filed under College Football

4 responses to “Mel Tucker hot take #2

  1. ASEF

    The smaller guys already are banding together. They’ve capped the number of guys in the booths, number on the head sets, etc. That’s just going to keep growing every year.

    Like

  2. Macallanlover

    Childish use of the extra dollars will bring about reform and control, so it will result in better use of those dollars in the future (if they don’t dry up first). There are so many improvements needed on facilities, it is hard to believe they began wasting dollars with Disneyland type additions before they came close to addressing more practical uses of available dollars. Indoor practice facilities may be expensive but they play a needed role, especially when compared to waterfalls and slides. Better medical equipment and safety testing are priorities that should be much higher up the ladder.

    Like

  3. Former Fan

    The only way they will get an anti-trust exemption is if they pay a LOT of money to the smaller schools, and open up the playoffs to them. I doubt senators from the smaller states, pac12, big12, etc. will agree to an anti-trust exemption without taking care of their schools back home.

    Like