No Dawg porn for you today

Looking for a somewhat grim assessment of Jamie Newman?  Welp, here you go.  The conclusion alone should give you pause for thought:

Jamie Newman throws with noticeable zip on his passes. Used to his guys not creating much separation, he often had to put a little extra mustard on his attempts. That element along with a high average depth of target and battling fatigue from frequently carrying the ball all played roles in his overall passing inefficiency. He should be asked to do far less at Georgia, which should allow him to focus on his improving his shortcomings. Though Georgia takes some shots, their scheme is far less vertical than what Wake Forest set out to do. Bringing his targets in closer and granting him designs where his weapons can do damage after the catch will help Newman’s production. He is leaving a place where he was the primary engine for his offense for a place where he will be a cog in a greater machine. Not to mention, he should be less stressed having a top-level defense. It is absolutely fair to worry about his high rate of uncatchable passes and dreadful results targeting intermediate areas of the field, but Newman has enough talent and athleticism to plug himself into UGA’s offense and produce. With a better supporting cast, more manageable scheme, and a year of improvement, Newman has the potential to keep Georgia in that title discussion. But I would be lying if I didn’t have a little trepidation about his play entering next season. To me, Newman has shades of a more aggressive Kellen Mond but the underwhelming downfield accuracy of Matt Corral.

This is where I think no spring practice hurts Georgia’s offensive hopes for 2020.  We can talk about reps and honing timing and there’s certainly some validity to that, but every day that Todd Monken can’t watch Newman in practice to see first hand where his strengths and weaknesses lie is a day when Monken can’t work hands on to shore up the deficiencies and, perhaps more importantly, structure his scheme around emphasizing Newman’s strengths.

Learning on the fly isn’t the greatest route to success when you have national title aspirations.  At least the defense should be stout enough to increase the offense’s margin for error early on.  Let’s hope that’s enough.

20 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!

20 responses to “No Dawg porn for you today

  1. mwo

    I know this is a different time and the game has changed considerably, but I have to believe Jamie Newman is at least as good a qb as Greg McElroy or AJ McCarron. Both of those guys had salty defenses and won a natty. I didn’t want to believe the WR departures were gonna hurt as bad last year as everyone on here predicted but I was wrong. I’m starting to get some apprehension about the qb situation this year.

    Like

    • dawgtired

      I’m concerned those valuable reps between QB and WR will be sorely missed early on. If we get a season amid the pandemic, I hope they get a chance to get accustom to each other before it costs us.

      Like

  2. dawgtired

    “It is absolutely fair to worry about his high rate of uncatchable passes and dreadful results targeting intermediate areas of the field,”

    Well this comment is cringe-worthy. Over the years, I’ve witnessed lots of those athletic-mile-chunking QBs with the inability to connect with receivers. They can throw the ball a mile, and it looks really cool, until you see the ball skipping along the grass at 90mph. It does no good to have arm strength if you can’t connect with your receivers. It’s frustrating when tons of talent does not equal success.
    I certainly hope Newman is NOT one of those. It doesn’t look like it from the highlights I’ve watched but it’s concerning to read someone make the above comment.
    Funny how so many are seeing Newman differently. I saw a list of Heisman candidates that had JN 3rd on the list to win it. Go figure.
    Here’s to hoping we at least get somewhere in between the Heisman and the uncatchable. I don’t think it will take no where near Heisman play from Newman to get us to the NC.

    Like

  3. spur21

    Did you hear that clanging – that was the knife hitting the floor after slitting my wrist.

    Like

  4. Anonymous

    Here is what sounded even more depressing:

    “Though Georgia takes some shots, their scheme is far less vertical than what Wake Forest set out to do.”

    We’ve had guys like Wims, Hardman, Holloway, Ridley, Cager, and Pickens, and are still less vertical than Wake Forest????

    Like

  5. W Cobb Dawg

    “…battling fatigue from frequently carrying the ball.”

    All that scrambling and “frequently carrying the ball” really takes a toll on QBs. And I like the inference that throwing deep passes and passes with zip adds to the lethargy. I don’t see how QBs like Burrow and Tua, or Murray, Mayfield, SCam, etc., etc. overcame all that fatigue! We’ll be lucky if Newman doesn’t collapse from exhaustion.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I know I’m looking at the article with a UGA bias, but I read it knowing Wake Forest is the least-talented power 5 team according to the 247 composite, and you get to a couple sentences like this:

    But once a pair of his favorite play makers were lost for the year and Wake hit the meat of their schedule, Newman’s overall effectiveness waned. Despite being looked upon to make plays, Newman overly failed to make a difference down the stretch.

    So, Wake was the least-talented Power 5 team to start with, Newman lost the two best weapons on the offense, and the fact he can’t will a no-talent team to put up a bunch of offensive numbers against defenses that way out-talent them is supposed to surprise me? I know he’s not like Cam Newton who put a dysfunctional offense on his back for a year and won a title. I don’t expect that. If he does nothing more than keep the ball on a zone read a few times per game and complete 55% of his passes, I think the offense will improve over what it was last season.

    The criticism of the Wake Forest play-calling seems completely out of context without considering a no-talent team was doing what it could to move the ball and score enough points to win games. The offense was simple, but they were held under 30 points just three times, once by Clemson who could have benched their entire starting 22 and still had more talent at every position on the field than the Deacs. They scored 59 against Louisville and lost.

    Though they feasted on lesser foes within ACC play, they overly faltered when up against competent secondaries.

    Again, Wake Forest was less talented than Vandy, so I don’t know the measurement you use to decide which ACC teams were lesser. I guess the ones that lost to Wake would be the lesser ones? Isn’t that by nature a circular confirmation of what you want to be true… or another version of dawg-grading?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. I just hope we get to see him play, even if he does suck.
    Honestly, I think he’ll do fine. Kirby knows what he’s doing.

    Like

  8. Ozam

    I can honestly say I’ll be happy no matter what if we are teeing it up on September 7, 2020.

    Like

  9. Assuming we even have a CFB season, I’m hoping Newman can at least match what Fromm produced a year ago. I expect more turnovers, but also more deep shots, too. But I think people placing Newman in the Heisman contender category and thinking we’re gonna light the world on fire with him are probably going to be disappointed.

    Like

  10. jlove

    all these years — i really wish you’d stop using porn in the titles. it flags them as blocked at work. of course, now im at home these days and can finally read them. just thought id mention it though.

    Like

  11. AceDawg

    All relative to how prepared the OTHER teams are as well.

    Like

  12. Dylan Dreyer's Booty

    The point about not getting reps is valid; we would all (coaches, players, fans) like to see the most prepared team possible if and when they play. But all teams are in the same boat, and I think we might be okay with a couple of scrimmages against Directional U to start the season, but that isn’t our schedule this year. That’s the part that worries me a little.

    Like

  13. Matt

    Ehh, I think this is a touch overblown. Newman is definitely a flawed player in certain regards, but there appears to be more than enough strengths to build a national title offense around.

    The passing game definitely needs to improve for that to happen (and that’s no sure thing with so many new faces), but at the same time it doesn’t need to become LSU overnight either.

    If Newman can threaten the field deep, extend some plays with his legs, and keep defenses honest on read option plays then he’s going to find a great deal of success.

    Like