First off, it’s hard to argue with Ross Dellenger’s take on why the SEC chose to play an all-conference schedule.
… Why try to squeeze in out-of-conference affairs during a pandemic? It puts even more risk on your teams—injuries, viral outbreaks, etc. The goal is to complete a conference season and crown a conference champion. It’s easier to do that without intertwining these non-conference games.
Also, the league basically ran out of Saturdays, as Florida AD Scott Stricklin aptly put it Thursday during a news conference. The SEC is kicking off its new season on Sept. 26, three weeks later than previously scheduled. It has built in a mid-season bye week for each team (spread over a three-week stretch, according to commissioner Greg Sankey), and there is a shared off week of Dec. 12 for any games interrupted by virus outbreaks (there almost certainly will be some). They’ve also pushed the championship game back to Dec. 19.
Where it all starts, though, is putting off play until that September 26 date, which looks to be later than any other conference, at least for now. Andy Staples ($$) explains what might be the thinking behind that choice.
By starting on Sept. 26, administrators at SEC schools can watch two full NFL game weekends to attempt to discern the best way to go about trying to play games. They also may get a look at some college games. Oklahoma and Kansas have scheduled non-conference games for Aug. 29 — pending any Big 12 scheduling decisions — and the ACC plans to start playing the same week as the NFL (that Saturday is Sept. 12). The delay will give SEC leaders more data to make an informed decision about how exactly the season should work or if it should start at all.
Also,
… During an interview on The Paul Finebaum Show, Sankey suggested that the surge of students returning to campus next month was a big reason why. “Over the last two weeks of August, we are going to have tens of thousands of people back on our campuses. We need to make sure that happens and happens well,” he said.
The league’s medical experts advised officials to delay the season to (1) monitor what happens in the professional leagues (NFL, MLB, NBA, etc.) and (2) account for spikes when students arrive on campus and football camp begins.
In other words, simply announcing a schedule doesn’t mean they’re out of the woods yet.
Besides that, though, the late start has its own set of issues.
Also, the league basically ran out of Saturdays, as Florida AD Scott Stricklin aptly put it Thursday during a news conference. The SEC is kicking off its new season on Sept. 26, three weeks later than previously scheduled. It has built in a mid-season bye week for each team (spread over a three-week stretch, according to commissioner Greg Sankey), and there is a shared off week of Dec. 12 for any games interrupted by virus outbreaks (there almost certainly will be some). They’ve also pushed the championship game back to Dec. 19.
That’s what killed the ACC rivalry games for most of the SEC East. Sankey is hoping that they’ve created enough breaks in the schedule to provide schools with enough mid-season flexibility to weather any COVID storms that may come up, but that meant something had to give, as Stricklin noted. Whether that actually works is something we’ll just have to wait and see.
So, it’s fair to say that one primary motivation for the league was to maintain as much control over the schedule as the pandemic might allow. Another… well, you can probably guess another:
A conference-only slate accomplishes two other things that people haven’t discussed enough, both involving money. It provides television partners with juicy marquee conference collisions on a weekly basis and it supplies colleges with a potential way out of their “buy game” contracts. At least two SEC ADs tell SI that their contracts feature a clause allowing them to void the deal if the league office changes the scheduling format. This is significant, as these “buy games” can cost schools upwards of $3 million in a single season. That’s not to say these games against Group of 5 and FCS teams won’t be rescheduled for later in the decade. It’s to say these teams (barring a court battle, which is possible) won’t immediately get their money.
Hardly surprising.
Which brings me to the final topic of this post. And it’s got real potential to be a mess.
![Screenshot_2020-07-31 (1) Brandon Marcello on Twitter Arkansas AD Hunter Yurachek says longtime SEC administrator Mark Woma[...]](https://blutarsky.files.wordpress.com/2020/07/screenshot_2020-07-31-1-brandon-marcello-on-twitter-arkansas-ad-hunter-yurachek-says-longtime-sec-administrator-mark-woma....png?w=500)
Mess might be too low key a description there, now that I think about it. Unleash the SEC-‘Bama conspiracy talk!
Marcello writes that the conference already has a few scenarios gamed out.
The Southeastern Conference has already set its schedule.
Now it’s just a matter of which of several versions the league’s 14 athletic directors will approve in the coming days, an industry source told 247Sports on Thursday.
“Schedules are ready,” the source said. “Just have to decide which one the conference ants to use.”
There are more than three models up for discussion among the SEC’s athletic directors. The athletic directors are scheduled to meet Friday, but it’s not clear if they will vote at that time, a separate SEC source said.
Staples speculates about meshing money and scheduling:
If the SEC wanted to improve its television product to ensure the biggest possible payout from partners ESPN and CBS — remember, no one is worried about selling out stadiums this fall — then Georgia (which plays Alabama and Auburn but not LSU) would get LSU added to the schedule and Florida (which plays LSU but not Alabama or Auburn) would get the Iron Bowl duo added to its schedule. That would create the most optimal matchups from a national viewership standpoint, but it also would righteously tick off the people at the league’s best programs because they drew the toughest matchups. Expect a more egalitarian distribution of games, even if that isn’t necessarily the best thing for the bottom line.
Egalitarian, eh? All I can say about that is this had better be the hill Greg McGarity is prepared to die on. If Georgia has to give up the Tech rivalry and doesn’t at least get a tougher Florida schedule out of the deal, that will not be a happy outcome for me.
You must be logged in to post a comment.