Today, in coachspeak

Kirbs says something, something about offense:

On the direction of the offense under Coach Monken/whether it is influenced by the success of other programs’ and their RPOs (Run-Pass Options)…
“I don’t think that the offenses that are highly success aren’t necessarily RPOs—I would disagree with that… Yeah, it’s built around what we think we can do and be most successful with the players we have. Certainly, [we] study a lot of teams that were successful last year, as we do every year. [We] look [at] what we have similar to other teams that might have something similar to us—meaning if there is an elite receiver or an elite tight end or maybe [defensive] backs or a really good, featured quarterback. Whatever it is that we think we can simulate with the players we have that teams have been successful with. You have to be careful when you talk about that because our league is very different than many others. The outlier for me would be obviously LSU last year, being what they did. You can see on every Sunday what they had, and what they were capable of with the ammunition they had. Everybody tries to copycat to an extent, and do what people do well. We have to build that around what we have and what we are capable of doing with what we have.”

First, can somebody help a blogger out and parse “I don’t think that the offenses that are highly success aren’t necessarily RPOs—I would disagree with that” for me?  For the life of me, I can’t figure out if he’s praising or dissing RPOs.

Building around what you have is fairly anodyne stuff, but you’ll have to forgive me if I think he was really stung by what LSU did last season.  Not that I blame him, either.

6 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Strategery And Mechanics

6 responses to “Today, in coachspeak

  1. I listened to the press conference last night. I couldn’t understand what he was trying to say there other than design your offense around the players you have. In other words, Jimmies and Joes over Xs and Os.

    We had a big, experienced offensive line and an elite running back with talent lacking at the pass catching positions. Therefore, manball was the order for the day.

    With Hardman, Ridley, Nauta and Holloman along with 2 good running backs, you could be more balanced.

    That’s all I got.

    Like

  2. Down Island Way

    As long as UGA scores points inside the 3 yard line with the rpo play, he doesn’t mind all to much…should UGA be scoring from 50 yards away, he doesn’t mind that either…(RPO= return productive offense)…

    Like

  3. Josh Striker

    My attempt to parse “I don’t think that the offenses that are highly successful aren’t necessarily RPOs”–a good offense needn’t run a ton of RPOs.

    Liked by 1 person

    • californiadawg

      This was my interpretation as well. I think he misspoke with the double negative, and “aren’t” should be “are.”

      Like

  4. Harold Miller

    Or he could be engaging in Coach newspeak.

    Like

  5. FlyingPeakDawg

    I saw Notre Dame, among others, play simple pitch and catch with their oversized TE’s. Our TE’s run block. Ergo, ispo, facto…Kirby gonna do what Kirby gonna do.

    Like