Honestly, the first thing I do when I get home with Steele’s Preview is check out where the Dawgs stand (or fall) in his top individual units rankings.
The good news is that Georgia is only one of two teams with all eight position groups finishing in the top twenty. (I won’t bore you by naming the other program, although it’s worth mentioning that Oklahoma just missed by finishing 22nd in special teams and Clemson was also 7 of 8, outside the top 63 in special teams.)
Here’s where each unit sits:
- Quarterback. Georgia is 11th, Ole Miss is second. Oklahoma is first.
- Running back. Dawgs are second, behind TAMU.
- Receivers. 20th. (Yes, receivers includes tight ends.)
- Offensive line. 7th. (Surprised? Maybe a little, but Steele sees a lot of talent at the position.)
- Defensive line. 2nd, behind Clemson.
- Linebackers. 4th, behind Alabama and Clemson.
- Defensive backs. 20th. Alabama is first.
- Special teams. 2nd, behind Alabama.
All in all, not too shabby.
Head to head, Alabama finished 5-3 against Georgia, but two of those units where ‘Bama ranked higher were back to back with the Dawgs. It’s close, in other words.
What do y’all think?
All it tells me is this another data point for the “no excuses not to be in Atlanta” point of view. This team is more talented than every team we play … yes, that includes the Greater Anderson Cow College.
LikeLike
I got Steele’s encyclopedia-like magazine in the mail for the first time this year. I have no idea how I got on the mailing list, but jfc there are a lot of numbers in that thing.
LikeLike
Surprised at the WR group – wonder if that was done before Gilbert?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Our TE WR group should be way higher.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Had the same thoughts……also question the defensive line. Clemson has some 5 star talent returning, but so do the Dawgs and they certainly played better a year ago (#1 – rush defense).
Especially when you consider what conference they are playing in. With what we have coming back, I’d rate the Dawgs #1 there.
Thinks he is just looking solely at the star rankings. But I like it, will probably give us a bigger chip on our shoulders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
#1 D line from an ACC team? Like that Louseville #1 D that Chubb ran for 270yards on.
LikeLiked by 4 people
No, speaking of the Dawgs. They finished #1 nationally.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Without Pickens it’s a lot of rock solid guys and a lot of potential. Gilbert looked real good but he still only MIGHT be the next Kyle Pitts, and that’s a very very big ask.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How does Georgia stack up against Clemson in these rankings?
LikeLike
QB: UGA>CU
RB: UGA>CU
REC: UGA<CU
OL: UGA>CU
DL: UGA<CU
LB: UGA<CU
DB: UGA<CU
They’re back to back on DL and LB.
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
Perhaps this is just me, but I find it more readable if the greater than is always on the left. Then you can kinda count them up more easily too:
QB: UGA > CU
RB: UGA > CU
REC:CU > UGA
OL: UGA > CU
DL: CU > UGA
LB: CU > UGA
DB: CU > UGA
LikeLike
I wonder about the QB ratings. Rattler and Corral as 1-2 (although I might say 2-1) don’t surprise me but I wonder about the 8 in between them and JT. Are we talking unproven freshmen 5*s? Is Emory Jones in there? I have to question that a little bit. But in less than 8 weeks now we get to find out for real.
LikeLike
UF is 44th.
BTW, UF is only top 20 in two of Steele’s unit rankings.
LikeLike
Hah! I guess Phil didn’t read this: https://hailfloridahail.com/2021/06/29/emory-jones-is-a-better-quarterback-than-jt-daniels/
Or maybe he did and just took it with a grain of salt. 😉
LikeLike
That Jeremy Chump has a keen eye for talent don’t cha know.
LikeLike
Did y’all get this in the mail or is it already on the news stands. I couldn’t find it when I looked Monday at Barnes and Noble.
LikeLike
As usual,
When we play that cow college from upstate scrub bush state…
turnovers, penalties, and special teams will decide the outcome.
LikeLike
I can only assume they are counting Smith and Anderson as DL. I’d also be shocked if Dean, walker, and tindall were outplayed by the likes of stakauskis or any other Clemson LB. I’m sort of befuddled as to how he could come to that conclusion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just glad that Skalski fellow has graduated, he was nasty……loved the way he played, but glad he is gone…
LikeLike
He is coming back for a sixth year. Not kidding.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Crazy…..maybe this is a time we could check to see if Inman has another year. A crazy on a crazy….
LikeLike