Hey, remember that simple question I asked the other day? Well…
The Realignment War of 2021 has begun, and this time, there is a particularly precious battleground: the expanded playoff model.
Conferences are scrambling and schools are jockeying, all of them tossed into a tizzy of action by the SEC’s bold play—stockpiling more of the nation’s richest college football programs.
It’s clear who the bad guys are this go-around: commissioner Greg Sankey and the Southeastern Conference, brandished by some here as the person and the entity that helped destroy a conference, pushed college football into a mess of disruption and compromised the expansion model.
Sankey was on the four-person working group that created the 12-team proposal, leading some around college athletics to question his motives as one of few who knew that his league could soon expand.
“It’s fishy,” says one.
“It’s insider trading,” says another.
While some say the SEC wisely and secretly leaped ahead of everyone else in the next wave of realignment, others describe the move as unnecessary and harmful to college sports. The SEC burned already charred bridges and even ruined personal relationships, they say.
As a result, high-level decision-makers are contemplating a retaliatory move. Does the Pac-12, Big Ten and others form an alliance against the big, bad SEC?
Only if that doesn’t cost them money.
************************************************************************
UPDATE: More carefully worded righteous indignation here ($$).
“It creates some concern about the way the 12-team proposal was constructed, with a limited number of folks in the room and imperfect information between the people who were in the room,” new Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff told The Athletic. “The proper process is: Everybody who has a say should have a say, and everybody should be operating with the same information.”
But, the money.
“This isn’t about throwing the baby out with the bathwater,” Kliavkoff said. “This is about tweaking it and making sure that issues — if the Big Ten, ACC and Pac-12 had been in the room, they would have been addressed already — but because they weren’t and this was a two-year process, we need a couple of months to actually collect those. We’ll work collaboratively.”
What, does he think Sankey would have told them what he was up to if only they were there?
You must be logged in to post a comment.