Ripped from the page of Andy Staples’ weekly mailbag ($$):
Did Dan Mullen make his most crucial mistake when he chose to cast himself as the direct opposite of Kirby Smart? It seems like they are polar opposites and Kirby has a team where the players are (mad) they allowed 17 points in a “flu game.” Meanwhile, well, it’s either the flu, or a player getting hurt dancing before a big game, or having your chief rival flip your three best recruits after you serve up prime recruiting material on a silver platter. Does Dan coach the first game next year? — Dave in Tampa, Fla.
Even better than the question’s whine is Staples’ epic takedown, which starts with the rebuttal that it wasn’t Mullen himself that made that comparison with Smart — it was delusional Florida fans after last year’s win:
The people who wanted to believe Mullen’s X’s-and-O’s prowess could compete with Smart’s Jimmies and Joes prowess over the long run are coming to the crushing realization that Mullen’s win against Georgia in 2020 probably was an outlier and not a sign of dominance to come.
It just gets better from there.
But the truth is Smart and Mullen are much closer in terms of in-game coaching ability than the commonly held portrayal suggests. And the truth also is that Smart is a much more successful recruiter than Mullen. In four recruiting cycles, Mullen signed 14 players ranked in the top 100 in the nation by the 247Sports.com composite. In the same four recruiting cycles, Smart signed 40.
Ask any coach who actually competes for national titles and they’ll explain that they’d much rather keep stockpiling top-100 recruits than be blessed with see-the-Matrix play-calling ability.
There’s a lot more where that came from. If you want to inject it into your veins, go read (if you have a subscription, that is).