Playoff expansion and duck walking

I have to admit my favorite part of the ongoing debate here about the inevitable growth of the college football playoff — inevitable to me, at least — is the insistence by some that there is some unique natural barrier that exists to limit the size of the postseason field because… well, because college football.

Never mind the history of organized sports in this country, which clearly demonstrates that it is in their nature to grow their postseasons because it’s a money making choice.  Never mind that the NFL above and the FCS below have both expanded their playoffs on several occasions, despite playing with smaller rosters.

And never mind the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, even though the same movers and shakers who have steadily pushed to enlarge it also direct the future of the CFP, because that’s basketball, and who in their right mind could possibly think that the one sport could be taken seriously as a template for the other?

Who, I ask you?

Yet the shelf life of the championship game barely lasts much longer than basketball conference tournament title games leading into the NCAA Tournament pairings. For many people in the public, the football championship game is viewed now as another data point for playoff consideration, though CFP Selection Committee protocol does say conference championships should be considered when comparing similar teams.

“There’s no question football is becoming like basketball,” [Ohio State AD Gene] Smith said. “We’re all talking about who’s in the playoffs, and the kids have done this magnificent thing of running through the regular season and the championship, and we don’t put that on the pedestal.”

If you doubt the truth of that, all you have to do is circulate on the Internet today looking at reports about Washington’s win over Colorado last night and note how many more of the takes from that are about Washington clinching a spot in the national semi-finals than about winning the conference, which, historically speaking, was a big deal for the Huskies.  That’s of a piece with the reaction to Auburn’s loss to Georgia, which ended the Tigers’ shot at the playoffs and somehow diminished the Iron Bowl in the eyes of many.

But it’s Smith’s conference that’s the real canary in the coal mine now.  As I mentioned the other day, Jim Delany’s evolution on the playoff has been something to watch.  As Big Ten Commissioner, he’s gone from vehemently opposing a college football playoff in any form, to opposing one that didn’t strictly exclude non-conference champions, to being reduced to a walking shrug on the issue.

And why not?  Neither of the two schools playing for the Big Ten title today will make the CFP field, regardless of which wins.  Meanwhile, Ohio State, which isn’t playing in it, is widely considered a shoo-in to make the national playoff and Michigan, which also isn’t in the championship game, still has a chance for the semis, too.  So the logical question to ask after today is how much does a championship game matter, anyway?  And you don’t have to look any farther than college basketball to answer that.

Thus, the follow up isn’t whether the national playoffs will expand to eight — the inevitable bickering that will result from whatever comes of today, along with the extra money from another round of games make that a when not if matter — but how long it takes for the people running the game to take the postseason field past eight.

That’s why you should read the rest of Solomon’s article.  It seems likely that the eight-team playoff itself will have repercussions on how the conferences decide to manage their regular seasons in its wake and that the changes to come will further serve to weaken the regional bonds on college football that are the real source of its unique appeal.  The more the game’s focus shifts to a national one, the easier it is to sell a larger postseason.

Again, don’t take my word on that.  Just listen to what Gene Smith is saying and what every other postseason field has done.  If you can.

18 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs

When less is more

An alert reader — thanks, Raleighwood Dawg — sent me this piece posted by ESPN’s Public Editor, who takes some time to explain the thinking behind the network’s ongoing experiment with off site announcers.  You can read the whole thing, but the dynamics involved are summarized in this one paragraph:

No one I talked to at ESPN — neither executives nor talent — suggested that remote broadcasting was an optimal experience. And sources within ESPN say the company has pulled back on the use of remote announcers in the past year. But because of the associated financial savings, the practice is unlikely to be discontinued.

Honestly, this isn’t one of those end of the world issues for me.  While there are announcers who do enhance the viewing experience, there are more who make me want to mute the audio because they’re little more than an annoying distraction.  It would be helpful if Mickey could allocate his precious resources with that in mind, but who am I kidding here?  In today’s world, a chatterbox announcer is often seen more as a feature than a bug.

It’s a shame this experiment by NBC more than thirty years ago didn’t catch on.

I remember watching that game broadcast live (yes, because of the gimmick) and came away enjoying the experience.  Just sayin’, WWL.

8 Comments

Filed under ESPN Is The Devil

Your weekly non-Dawg game day post, 12/3 edition

Weird mix of conference championship and run of the mill regular season games today.

Temple

#19Navy

12:00 PM

Navy still has something to play for, in terms of significant postseason chances.  The other thing that’s interesting about this game is that it matches on of the hottest defensive teams in the country, Temple, against a Navy squad that’s got the highest scoring average in the country over the last month or so.

#10Oklahoma State

#9Oklahoma

12:30 PM

Will Gundy’s mullet survive?

#1Alabama

#15Florida

4:00 PM

Come for the likely coronation.  Stay for Uncle Verne’s swan song.

#3Clemson

#23Virginia Tech

8:00 PM

Every time I see this game, I can’t help but think of Jim Donnan’s tag — the World’s Smallest Outdoor Cocktail Party.

#6Wisconsin

#7Penn State

8:00 PM

Two teams playing for the conference championship won’t make the college football playoffs.  Meanwhile, one, maybe two teams not playing in the championship game will make the CFP.  Welcome to the Big Ten, 2016.

25 Comments

Filed under College Football

“Kirby Smart has his own way of doing things at Georgia.”

This tweet got a lot of attention yesterday.

As we all know, by agreement between the two schools, no hosting of recruits occurs at the Cocktail Party… which is stupid on Georgia’s part, but I digress.

The idea that bringing the Florida game home and away would pay dividends in recruiting sounds reasonable, until you consider this:

By my count, the Bulldogs hosted a total of four official visitors during the entire 2016 season. Georgia will have more than that this weekend and will have tripled that total after next weekend.

Smart wants to win games first. The staff would rather focus on 1-2 official visitors and their families at the most on Saturdays. That’s one specific season.

Recruiting is also a year-round sport and yet the reality is the weeks that will define the program start this weekend. This is recruiting season.

Given the quality of the 2017 class he’s putting together, I tend to give Smart the benefit of the doubt regarding his priorities.  Regardless of your stance on where the Georgia-Florida series should be played, then, it doesn’t seem like recruiting is a factor.

72 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Recruiting

“Now the GAs have GAs.”

In light of my post yesterday about Saban, this piece about Tom Herman looking to remake the personnel staff at Texas is fascinating on a number of levels.

For instance, see if this sounds familiar:

There are several areas in which Texas lags behind national powers that Herman would like to fix, as he expressed to Dan Patrick this week when discussing recruiting.

“We need to stay competitive with the elite teams in the country — the Alabamas, the Ohio States, the Clemsons of the world — in terms of our facilities and our resources and support staff and recruiting staff and all that,” Herman told Patrick.

The last two areas are the most important in the short term, as the lack of a large support staff and recruiting staff contributed, at least in some part, to Charlie Strong’s failed tenure in Austin.

And the failed tenure of Mack Brown before him.

In fact, Texas was one of the last two schools in the Big 12 to hire a Director of Player Personnel in 2013. At the press conference to create that position, Brown admitted that “we’ve kinda been mom and popping it around here for a long time.”

The ‘Horns also didn’t have a football-specific strength and conditioning coach or a nutritionist until that time. Mom and popping it indeed.

Under Strong, it was much of the same, though there were some reports that former athletic director Steve Patterson wasn’t always willing to give him the resources he needed.

It’s going to be interesting to watch and compare where Georgia and Texas go over the next few years.  Sort of a massive controlled experiment.

26 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Texas Is Just Better Than You Are.

Insomnia

Danny Kanell is overwrought.

Can’t sleep, Danny?  Take two Herbstreit rationalizations and call me in the morning.

53 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs

If you’re a college sport’s postseason, you expand. It’s what you do.

Gotta love the perspective here.

Five years after they do, he’ll be asking some other coach the same question about 16.

25 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs