Haterz gonna hate, Herbstreit.
By the way, how did that whole rematch thing in 2006 work out for you?
Disney’s stock price took a major hit last week over potentially gloomy news about the long-term health of ESPN’s business model, which is incredibly profitable for its parent company. That, in turn, has led to some fascinating speculation about where the delivery of live sports broadcasting may be headed in the next ten years.
In one corner, you have this fairly pessimistic assessment – from the WWL’s point of view, that is – that sees the key to the future in the NFL contract that comes up for negotiation in 2020.
No Telethon Yet!
I don’t think we need to have a telethon to benefit the poor media giants just yet, but if you want to understand the time horizon to Mediamageddon, you need only look to the NFL.
Sometime circa December 2020, a deal is going to be reached between the television networks and the NFL. The last deal was inked in December 2011, and it extended the NFL’s various television rights packages by nine years from 2013 through 2022 for about $27 billion. What will that deal cost TV in 2020? Forty billion dollars? With TV ratings trending ever downward, will any television network or combination of television networks be able to pay that kind of licensing fee?
Apple/NFL The End of Days
Apple will have its Apple TV product firmly established by 2020. It has the cash. Will we be watching the NFL streamed live on Apple TV in 2022? Apple could probably purchase the entire NFL, but that’s for another column.
In 2022 will the NFL go direct to consumer – over the top – at let’s say $2.99 per game? The upside for the NFL would be huge. Although the audience would be smaller, it would be more affluent, and the direct-to-device data collection would empower unprecedented changes in the way marketers communicate their messages to consumers. No Nielsen ratings, just deterministic data enabling real-time metrics about campaign efficacy – advertiser heaven!
As Goes the NFL
The television business may be good or it may be bad. There may be headwinds or course corrections. Ups, downs, new technologies, the discovery of life on other planets, retinal implants to replace TV monitors – none of it matters. The TV business will be the TV business until the new NFL deal is done. If the TV industry comes up with enough cash to satisfy the NFL, it will be business as usual (declining ratings, higher spot prices, better targeting, etc., etc.) for the duration of the new contract.
If the NFL and the TV industry do not come to terms, it will be Mediamageddon and life as we know it will end. There will be no more media giants, no more meaningful networks that can deliver a live audience at scale and no more “tent pole” events with big-enough television audiences to command the budgets they currently command.
OTT distribution of the NFL, whether via Apple or Netflix or Comcast Xfinity or Verizon/AOL or direct-to-consumer from the NFL itself (probably courtesy of BAMTech), will be the destroyer of rate bases, the killer of reach curves and the advent of super-tight consumer targeting and transactional advertising on connected devices. The change will be so dramatic, the NFL might not have the motivation (or the courage) to do it as soon as 2020.
Well, gosh, I guess it’ll be up to the bold thinkers running the show for college football to lead the way, then.
Hey, a little humor is good for the soul.
There is another way to look at this, though. If the NFL decides to go its own way, that’s going to make whatever other live sports broadcasting is still available for ESPN to buy even that much more valuable to it. And if there’s one thing ESPN understands, it’s that the more it has, the merrier.
In July, The Wall Street Journal cited analysts that said ESPN would need to charge $30 for an over-the-top offering to bring in the same amount of money it currently does inside a cable bundle.
Given that about 100 million cable subscribers pay about $6 a month for ESPN, this assumes that 20 million people, or about 20% of current cable subscribers, sign up for a separate ESPN offering.
Which, if ESPN has effectively all sports you need to watch, seems like a fairly realistic target to Thompson. In this scenario, you’re betting that one in five current cable subscribers really likes sports and will pay a premium for ESPN.
Or to put it more simply, one simple reason why ESPN will probably be fine: They own basically everything.
Make sure you read the linked article at stratechery.com, as it goes into some depth about how Netflix offers a business model that ESPN could eventually embrace for survival.
To a greater extent than even before, ESPN is sports. It’s the only channel you need. In fact, its biggest problem is that there simply isn’t enough time in the day to view all of the inventory the network has rights to. That, though, is a solved problem: Netflix showed 7 years ago that streaming makes time constraints immaterial. Iger noted:
Those new deals all provide for more programming, more opportunity for content on digital platforms, which will enable us to increase consumption on digital platforms and grow that business even more and generally more flexibility in terms of how we distribute this product. So the NBA’s a great example. You can have a huge increase in essentially inventory on ESPN across its platforms. So while there is definitely increasing costs, there is a huge increase in terms of opportunity as well to reach more people, to serve advertisers more effectively and to grow our digital platforms.
The selfish question we consumers of college football should be asking ourselves is has anyone responsible for production of the product begun thinking about the consequences of how this may shake out over the next decade? I mean, it’s not like college football won’t have a few broadcast deals of its own to negotiate between now and 2025.
In the end, one thing’s for sure. If the 800-pound gorilla gets the hiccups, everyone else in the room is gonna shake.
Every year when this comes out, I’m always a little saddened to look through it and realize Ron Franklin’s name is missing.
Andy Staples looks at how college football broadcasts will be delivered to consumers in the future and asks a lot of questions that the people running the P5 conferences ought to be asking themselves today…
It’s quite possible that rights fees have hit their zenith, and athletic departments need to prepare for the fact that their revenue is not going to grow at the rate it has over the past 15 years. It might even dip as viewers adjust to a new world and figure out how they want to pay for it.
Chances are we’ll end up paying about what we pay now to watch college football in 10 years. But we’ll be far more aware of how much we pay, and we’ll be sending that money to different places. That’s why Iger’s comments should have every athletic director and conference commissioner thinking about how their leagues are positioned for their next deals.
… but probably aren’t. Hey, it’s not like there’s a crisis this second, right?
In just a few short weeks college football returns, so I know you’ve got an appetite.
This looks innocuous enough…
… until you click on the link and discover that the “analyst” is Paul Finebaum.
Must be a really slow offseason.
Although it’ll be on ABC instead of ESPN.
The ABC and ESPN studios will also see changes for 2015. John Saunders will continue to anchor Saturday’s ABC studio coverage, along with second-year analyst Mack Brown and 10-year ESPN analyst Mark May, who will make the switch from ESPN’s studio.
Enjoy that, Mack.
Meanwhile it looks like ESPN’s already groomed its next Mark May.
ESPN’s new studio trio features host Adnan Virk with analysts Joey Galloway and Danny Kanell, who will handle pre-game, halftime and post-game reporting on Thursday, Friday and Saturday during the season.
Oh, goody. I look forward to another season of SEC trolling/bashing by Kanell. Well, I would if I actually watched ESPN in the studio.