Al.com list entitled “SEC football’s notable NCAA cases over the years” contains nary a mention of Georgia.
Category Archives: SEC Football
Al.com hit Alabama and Auburn with FOIA requests to show us the money. You won’t be surprised to learn 2016 was a berry, berry good year.
Auburn Athletic Finances
Year Total Revenue Total Expenses Surplus/Deficit 2016 $140,070,593 $124,864,399 $15,206,194 2015 $124,657,247 $115,498,047 $9,159,200
A $16 million increase in revenue and a $6 million bump in profit is none too shabby.
Alabama did just fine, as well.
According to documents filed with the NCAA, the school’s profit increased 13.1 percent in 2016 to $18.7 million.
…To compare to Alabama’s $18.7 million total profit, Auburn’s athletics department reported a $15.2 million surplus. Auburn’s $140 million revenue was a school record, as was Alabama’s $164 million in income.
Georgia, as you no doubt know, isn’t in any hurry to respond to open records requests, so we’ll be waiting a while to hear what a great job Greg McGarity’s done in that regard. But if you’re of a mind to triangulate, you can find Georgia’s 2015 numbers here: $116,151,279 in total revenue and $19,591,972 in “surplus” (nice euphemism there). If things are fairly analogous — and you’d think they would be — Butts-Mehre is positively rolling in dough.
If the Committee agrees with the case against Ole Miss, a two-year bowl ban is a real possibility. The Rebels self-imposed a one-year ban on Wednesday, but the difference of a season is massive; a two-year ban would allow for current scholarship players to transfer without penalty.
Ole Miss would then have to survive being eaten alive by defections in addition to any potential scholarship restrictions the COI hands out.
Rival schools are not wasting time. When contacted by SB Nation Wednesday evening, coaches on two different SEC staffs confirmed their schools will evaluate the Rebels’ roster for potential talent, in case a two-year ban allowed transfers to play immediately.
Hoo, boy. This is why you beef up support staffs, boys.
Steve Shaw takes a victory lap.
The SEC improved officiating accuracy by nearly 8 percent in 2016 thanks to having more eyes on the replays, SEC officiating coordinator Steve Shaw told CBS Sports.
Eight per cent! That’s awesome. And just how did Shaw come up with the math for that?
Last season was the first in which the NCAA let conferences use people other than the stadium replay official to assist on reviews. The SEC had three replay officials at a command center in Birmingham, Alabama, to help the stadium replay official for all reviews. Shaw said he determined that collaboration helped 18 of the 226 reviews produce a correct outcome. The SEC declined to specify Shaw’s methodology for how he evaluated that a correct outcome was due to collaboration.
Greg Sankey could tell you, but then he’d have to kill you.
Mockery aside, if collaboration is really that great from an accuracy standpoint, shouldn’t somebody be insisting on a nationwide application? I mean, who could be against getting more calls correct?
The Pac-12 experimented with a command center in 2016 to monitor replays only for Oregon and California conference games. No decision has been made yet on whether the Pac-12 will use collaborative replay full-time in 2017, league officiating coordinator David Coleman said.
“It was a good experience for us,” Coleman said. “It gave us an opportunity to advise and consult and make sure our replay staff in those two locations was considering everything they needed to get a call right. We see the possibility of it growing in the future. Obviously, there are costs involved. That has to be considered.”
Yeah, we all know that times are tight in P5 conferences.
There are other reasons why centralizing reviews makes sense: consistency and a reduction in bias, as the Big Ten’s officiating coordinator explains.
But Carollo expressed concerns that command centers located in conference offices create conflicts of interest.
“I don’t like the structure of a collaborative center down the hallway from the commissioner because the conference may have something to gain if a certain team wins or loses – money-wise, playoff-wise, bowl-wise,” Carollo said. “Of course the conference wants certain teams to win. Conferences don’t make calls, but there is some pressure. That’s why we separate our officials away from the conference office. I want neutrality. That’s what the coaches want.”
“Of course the conference wants certain teams to win.”? I bet that gets a memo from Jim Delany. Carollo may be the most honest person in college football. A somewhat low bar, I know. But he’s right, and the best way to remove that pressure is to take reviewing out of the hands of conference officials entirely. It would also save money. Man, you’d think that’s about as win-win as things get for CFB.
I mean, damn, just damn.
Nothing like planning ahead, I always say.
Here’s the entirety of the SEC’s 2017 spring game schedule.
We’ll know Kirby’s made it when G-Day hits ESPN.
“From a philosophical standpoint, the number one thing that you got to do is you got to stop the run,” Grantham said. “You can’t let people run the ball on you.”
From there, as Grantham added, offenses become one-dimensional with the pass and the objective, from a defensive standpoint, is to make the quarterback’s life miserable with a pass-rush and force turnovers.
“If you do that,” Grantham said, “with the identity that we want to play with, which is fast, physical and aggressive, you’re going to be in every game.”
Also, “out of his front seven, Grantham wants physicality, size and an aggressive group that will look to create negative yardage plays.” Hey, I know of a defensive line coach out there he might want to take a look at.