Category Archives: The NFL Is Your Friend.

The suspend isn’t killing me.

Here’s what an NFL coach had to say about his impression of Todd Gurley at the Combine:

“He is a natural leader. Of course, we’ve all seen him play. But he is better in person than anything I’ve seen or read from afar. That kind of person stands out. Some team is going to rightly give him every chance to get well and be as great as he can be.”

Yeah, that whole autograph thing really seems to have set him back at the next level.

The NFL doesn’t care about players making money – at least if it’s not on the NFL’s own dime.  Manziel was a first-round pick.  If not for the injury, Gurley would be a slam dunk first-rounder, too.  (He may still wind up there, even so.)  The pros just care if you can play.  Which is why the Gurleys and Manziels of the college football world get paid under the table.  Talk about your vicious circle.  Good luck with that, NCAA.


Filed under It's Just Bidness, The NCAA, The NFL Is Your Friend.

For now, Bill Hancock gets to take a victory lap.

Color me a little surprised, but it sounds like Roger Goodell has blinked first about the potential conflict between the CFP and further NFL postseason expansion.

Support has eroded for a proposal to expand the NFL playoff field from 12 to 14 teams, to the point that the measure no longer is viewed as likely to be enacted for the 2015 season…

… Several of those with knowledge of the league’s internal deliberations said Wednesday there also are concerns about a Monday night playoff game potentially conflicting with college football’s new playoffs.

When NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell addressed the expanded-playoffs proposal during his annual state-of-the-league news conference two days before the Super Bowl, he did not offer an endorsement.

“There are positives to it,” Goodell said then. “But there are concerns as well, among them being the risk of diluting our regular season and conflicting with college football in January.”

Now, I don’t want this to sound like it’s etched in stone, because if you look closely, the real reason the brakes have been applied is that the NFL is uncertain about how much money the networks are willing to pony up for the extra product at this moment.  When it comes to money, the NFL hates uncertainty.

But still, it’s hard to see this as anything other than a plus for the college football suits, who get to crow that Goodell acknowledges their interests.  That’s unusual.  We’ll see how long it lasts.


Filed under BCS/Playoffs, The NFL Is Your Friend.

No, no, no.

I don’t want to be part of a world in which somebody feels a serious need to address a question like this.  College football should be zealously guarding every difference between it and the pro game, if for no other reason than the enormous parity gap between the two.

And let me just say that if you’re looking for the canary in the coal mine about college football completely selling out to broadcast interests, this is a pretty good choice:

One change I fear may one day come to the game is the addition of the two-minute warning. Without attempting to give any money-hungry power conference commissioners any ideas, the addition of a two-minute warning in college football would quickly help bring in more revenue for conferences and television partners, and would likely be something given quick approval when the idea of more easy money is brought to the table. How it has not happened yet considering the rising media packages and contracts in recent years is really surprising to me.



Filed under College Football, The NFL Is Your Friend.

“We’ve started a new tradition and we don’t want to back away from it now.”

I see Bill Hancock is moving his lips again.  The CFP is facing some pretty formidable pressure.

The College Football Playoff is under pressure on two fronts to adjust future schedules for its semifinals and championship games, sources say, but the CFP is standing firm on its original dates.

On one of those fronts, top ESPN executives are lobbying CFP officials to move next season’s semifinals off of New Year’s Eve where it would compete with highly rated star-filled countdown shows on several networks…

Sources say that senior network executives as high up as ESPN President John Skipper are pushing for the change as a way to get better television ratings, but the CFP is unwilling to make such a move because it is committed to the original plan to hold tripleheader bowl games, including the semifinals, on New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day…

Meanwhile, the CFP is facing pressure on another front. The NFL is considering expanding its playoffs and moving one of the new games to Monday night when it would compete directly with the CFP championship.

Sources say NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell initiated a series of high-level meetings with some of the CFP’s most influential commissioners, including the SEC’s Mike Slive and the Big Ten’s Jim Delany. Goodell approached the commissioners to discuss the potential impact an NFL playoff expansion would have on the CFP championship game.

The 10 FBS commissioners and Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick make up the management council that oversees the College Football Playoff.

If the NFL ends up expanding the number of teams that make its postseason, the league would need two more TV windows to account for the new games. In separate meetings, Goodell told the college commissioners that any playoff expansion likely would put a wild-card game on Monday night, sources said.

The CFP’s 12-year contract with ESPN calls for the title game to be played on a Monday night, typically the second Monday in January.

Standing firm against ESPN and the NFL?  Yeah, suuurrre.

Hancock said his office has voiced its opposition to putting an NFL playoff game against the CFP championship on Monday night.

“We picked Monday night because it was open and it was the best night for our game. We announced that in June 2012,” Hancock said. “We established that our game was going to be on Monday night for 12 years.”

Given what we’ve seen of Hancock’s bluffing ability from past pronouncements, I have no doubt that Mickey will take his line in the sand with all the seriousness it deserves.  I doubt anyone’s quaking in his or her boots yet.

Adding fuel to the fire is that ESPN would be caught in the middle of any conflict between the CFP and NFL playoff expansion.

ESPN’s CFP contract mandates that the games are carried on ESPN — not ESPN2 or ESPNU, sources say. Plus, cable sources say that some of ESPN’s affiliate deals contain language that would prohibit the network from putting either the CFP championship or an NFL playoff game on ABC.

The NFL almost certainly would not allow one of its playoff games to move to ESPN2.

Still, the NFL could sell a Monday night playoff game to another network. A media industry source suggested that the NFL could look into packaging the new wild-card playoff games with its “Thursday Night Football” package beginning with the 2016 season. CBS last week signed a deal to keep that package for 2015.

Right.  The WWL could just give up an incredibly valuable franchise without a fight.

That’s not all that’s at stake here for the WWL.

The CFP semifinals on New Year’s Day already proved their ability to attract viewers. The semifinals — played at the Allstate Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl presented by Northwestern Mutual — each drew more than 28 million viewers. At the time, they were the two most-viewed programs in cable TV history.

The CFP championship game on Jan. 12 averaged 33.4 million viewers, becoming the first show in cable TV history to top 30 million viewers. Privately, ESPN insiders say they are prepared for double-digit drops in viewership if the semifinals remain on New Year’s Eve.

Get ready to hear about CFP’s new, new tradition, which is really about the only tradition college football cherishes these days – keeping the checks rolling in.


Filed under BCS/Playoffs, ESPN Is The Devil, The NFL Is Your Friend.

“I don’t know the Cowboys’ schedule, but you never know when they want to do a walkthrough, or something else is going on.”

LMAO time:  The CFP is looking at a potential conflict between the Dallas Cowboys playoff schedule and preparation time for its national championship game.

At its most basic level, the Cowboys’ playoff game could alter the amount of time each of the final two teams have to prepare for a game inside AT&T Stadium; of the four Playoff teams, Florida State is the only one to have played a game at the stadium during the past two seasons.

“You’ve got two teams coming in who need to practice,” said Martin Jarmond, Ohio State’s Associate Athletics Director for Development. “One of our questions was, what does that look like if the Cowboys keep winning, which they have — when will we be able to get into the stadium?

But, hey, Bill Hancock says they’ve been “… planning this with the Cowboys and the stadium staff for several months”, so I’m sure this will all work out fine.  Because somehow Hancock knew long ago how successful the Cowboys’ season would turn out to be.  Hope he made a few bucks in Vegas while he was at it.


Filed under BCS/Playoffs, The NFL Is Your Friend.

Speaking of business decisions…

As a complement to my last post, consider this:

Now, which do you think is a better incentive to keep kids in school, the NFL wagging a finger at their dreams, or receiving enough money while enrolled to make staying in college easier?


Filed under The NFL Is Your Friend.

Still in Judge Wilken’s courtroom

When the O’Bannon ruling came down, I noted that the big challenge going forward for Jeffrey Kessler would be dismantling the one argument made by the defense that Judge Wilken accepted – that there is some level of student-athlete compensation that would adversely affect college athletics’ business model.

It sounds like Kessler is going to have to deal with that issue sooner than later.

The NCAA and a group of 11 Division I conferences on Thursday filed a motion to dismiss lawsuits challenging the NCAA’s scholarship limits, arguing the claims contradict a ruling from the same judge in the Ed O’Bannon case…

“Plaintiffs seek to be compensated immediately for their participation in intercollegiate sports in an unlimited amount based on their individual athletic ability or the quality of their individual performances,” the NCAA and conferences wrote. “Such a claim is entirely inconsistent with (Wilken’s) decision in O’Bannon. Indeed, plaintiffs contend that defendants would still be liable for antitrust violation if … they adopted the very student-athlete compensation limits” that Wilken approved in O’Bannon.

While this is the crux of what Kessler has to overcome to win, I don’t think it’s necessarily the end of the world for the schools and the NCAA if Wilken denies their motion.  She may simply be wanting to see what kind of evidence Kessler can marshal in support of his position.  As to whether she comes ultimately to a different conclusion than she did in O’Bannon, that’s probably not a big concern for her, because if Kessler wins, that result will essentially supersede the earlier ruling, anyway.


Filed under The NFL Is Your Friend.