It sounds like the NCAA is finally about to drag itself kicking and screaming into a future where Congress doesn’t bail its ass out with federal legislation. Or at least ponder the possibility.
At the two-year anniversary of the NIL Era, industry leaders are increasingly voicing one question: If the NCAA‘s efforts to secure a federal NIL bill fall short, what is Plan B?
Now the NCAA’s NIL subcommittee has in fact been tasked with exploring a Plan B in case Congress does not act by passing a federal NIL bill. The NCAA Division I Council received updates on the work of the NIL subcommittee last Tuesday and Wednesday at NCAA headquarters in Indianapolis, a source with direct knowledge of the meetings told On3.
The purpose of the meetings – attended Tuesday and Wednesday by first-year NCAA President Charlie Baker – extended beyond merely discussing NIL-specific guidance and interpretation. Rather, the source said, the purpose was to develop details around an NIL-specific proposal in case Congress doesn’t act to pass a federal NIL bill.
So, what’s Plan B? This is the only concrete suggestion in the linked article:
The NCAA issued a memo last week that said member schools must “adhere to NCAA legislation (or policy) when it conflicts with permissive state laws.” But Texas A&M indicated it will follow state NIL law instead of NCAA policy. What happens next could ignite a legal clash.
“The NCAA is a voluntary organization,” the source said. “If [schools in] Texas want to go way outside the guidelines and say, ‘We don’t have to follow NCAA rules,’ the NCAA can say, ‘We don’t have to invite you to NCAA championships either.’”
Sounds like fun. More popcorn, please!