April 3, 2013 · 7:21 AM

Does the NCAA even bother with background checks?

At this point, it’s hard for me to see Mark Emmert as anyone more than Michael Adams with better PR skills.

11 Comments

Filed under The NCAA

11 responses to “Does the NCAA even bother with background checks?”

  1. Lrgk9
    April 3, 2013 at 8:05 AM

    Oy Vey. A Snake in any other job is still a Snake.

    Like

  2. Scorpio Jones, III
    April 3, 2013 at 8:12 AM

    Senator, it is embarrassing the way you suck up to Mark Emmert.

    Like

  3. Hogbody Spradlin
    April 3, 2013 at 8:31 AM

    Or Michael Adams with more chutzpah.

    Like

  4. Dog in Fla
    April 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM

    The takeaway from the awesome “Digging into the past of NCAA President Mark Emmert” initial background check is that you never want to provoke a Schrotenboer war because they don’t stop.

    Like

  5. AlphaDawg
    April 3, 2013 at 10:32 AM

    Is Kick Ball a PR Skill?

    Like

    • Dog in Fla
      April 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM

      Yes. It’s a subset under the ‘Balls’ heading and appears immediately after Dodge Ball in the “PR Skillz Manual.”

      Like

  6. Cojones
    April 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM

    His resume leaves one feeling a little dirty the same way some do about Adams.

    Why didn’t someone tell me? 🙂

    Like

    • Dog in Fla
      April 3, 2013 at 12:34 PM

      At the NCAA Caves and Bunkers Division if you aren’t dirty, you aren’t here to party. Here’s how a typical “How Tunnels Work” performance lesson goes even after they let Ameen Najjar and Julie Roe Lach go

      Like

  7. Mayor of Dawgtown
    April 3, 2013 at 2:20 PM

    It seems that every day there is a new revelation about Mark Emmert that is, I will put it discretely, embarrassing. This guy has to go in order for the NCAA to survive as a credible institution. What an amazingly bad hire.

    Like

  8. Dawg19
    April 3, 2013 at 11:37 PM

    Why do I get the feeling this guy will be elected President one day?

    Like