Boy, this is some first-rate arrogance on display:
“Nuanced mathematical formulas ignore some teams who ‘deserve’ to be selected”? So, you’re saying deserves got something to do with it? What’s the difference between deserving and best? (That’s a rhetorical question – I think we all know what they have in mind when it comes to deserving.)
And, of course, things wouldn’t be complete without a punchline. Come here, punchline.
Hoping for an alabama loss, an oregon loss, a florida state loss and an ohio state win. A recreation of the Austin Powers exploding fembot heads imo. If we can’t be in a decent bowl then my vote is for anarchy.
LikeLike
Bring in the femBAAAHHHTS!
LikeLike
They were hotter than Thai money but not as hot as the super-hot girls in the store windows in the downtown Bangkok shopping district.
LikeLike
Lord save us from experts. I bet they’ve all got diplomas from “top” universities too.
LikeLike
…same guys studying the Ark, right? “Top. Men.”
LikeLike
“Under the current construct, polls (although well-intended) have not expressed there values; particularly at the margins where teams that have won head-to-head competition and championships are sometimes ranked behind non-champions and teams that have lost in head-to-head competition.”
So…….
#3 TCU
#6 Baylor
…….?
LikeLike
Committe begging for Kansas St victory Saturday.
LikeLike
“Same as it ever was…” David Byrne
LikeLike
That’s ten pounds of manure in a five-pound sack right there.
LikeLike