Observations from the armchair, Vanderbilt edition

We’ve already hashed out so much, that I don’t think a lengthy exposition is called for here.  But there are a few things worth noting.  Bullet points, you ready?

  • The good.  And there was plenty.  Isaiah McKenzie looks smoother on returns than last year, which should scare the crap out of opposing teams.  Begone, spirit of Logan Gray!  Malcolm Mitchell looks like he’s got his old toughness back in spades.  There is ridiculous defensive speed.  The offensive line held up in the face of eight and nine men in the box, as well as safeties crashing the line of scrimmage, to pave the way to 284 rushing yards against a decent SEC defense.  Wynn’s improvement in one week was noticeable.  Jordan Jenkins has taken his game to another level.  Leonard Floyd in the middle of the field has worked better than I thought.  Sony Michel.  Speaking of which, did anybody catch Terry Godwin’s block on Michel’s touchdown run?
  • The bad.  Receivers struggled on occasion to get separation.  The defense still lacks a presence at inside linebacker in pass coverage, which is why I keep hoping Roquan Smith can get up to speed soon.  Marshall Morgan can’t miss field goal attempts like that.  Natrez Patrick losing contain on the fumbled punt snap that went for a first down.
  • The ugly.  Lambert’s first half.  The hands to the face penalty called on Leonard Floyd.  Letting Vanderbilt run 94 offensive plays (to give you an idea of how ugly that was, the only game in the last seven years I could find close to that was Georgia Tech’s 92 plays in 2010).
  • The disappointing.  Letting Vanderbilt score late.  Another pooch kick misadventure.  Another ejection for targeting.  Not cashing in on a couple of pick-six opportunities.  Not opening up the playbook on offense for a second week.
  • The weird.  It’s Nashville, so weird comes with the territory.  But I think what qualifies as weirdest is characterizing Nick Chubb’s day as “quiet”.  (By the way, he leads the conference in rushing yards, despite averaging less than eighteen carries a game.)

The key moment of the game for me came in the second quarter.  Lambert threw a pass that was ill-advised, to say the least, and was fortunately bailed out by the stone hands of the Vandy safety.  On the next play, Sony Michel took off for the end zone and 31 yards later, it was 14-0.  Georgia wasn’t threatened after that.

Just like the rest of you, I have no idea why Schottenheimer’s play calling has been so constipated.  Is it lack of faith in the passing game?  A strong desire not to show much until the meat of the schedule arrives?  Your guess is as good as mine, but one thing I’ll point out is that when Georgia appeared to hit that “enough of this shit” moment in the third quarter, Schottenheimer called his best series of the game, topped by a perfect option read by Lambert for the score.  You tell me what that means.

This could have been a more lopsided game, true.  But it’s also worth noting that Georgia didn’t win the field position battle, which is something that makes its offense a more efficient machine.  How much did the officiating and Patrick’s mistake play into that?

Survive and advance, people.  Survive and advance.

111 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

111 responses to “Observations from the armchair, Vanderbilt edition

  1. Spike

    The muffed pooch kick should be given a category all it’s own. That looked like Q Hicks back there. And it could have cost us the game.

    Like

    • kckd

      Not against Vandy. Against someone else maybe. Heck, even if they had scored there we’re still up by 3 and they’d have to do it again.

      Like

      • Nate Dawg

        If UGA is on your schedule, how do you not pooch kick every kickoff? I mean 1 outta 2 worked Saturday, and that’s Vandy…

        Like

        • DawgPhan

          You must be new here. Coaches never do something like onside kick every time even though the math works because they are scared of losing their paychecks.

          Like

  2. The muffed pooch kick was as much to blame on alignment as anything.

    Like

    • Russ

      I couldn’t believe that alignment. Somebody had to have messed up, and if so, we should have called timeout and fixed it. That was as close to a gimme pooch kick turnover as you’re ever going to see.

      Like

  3. Just like the rest of you, I have no idea why Schottenheimer’s play calling has been so constipated. Is it lack of faith in the passing game? A strong desire not to show much until the meat of the schedule arrives? Your guess is as good as mine, …

    To paraphrase an oft-repeated meme by Spencer Hall, nothing good comes when NFLAIDS invades a college football team.

    Like

  4. Leonard Floyd in the middle of the field has worked better than I thought.

    I almost lost my mind with amazement when I saw him running step for step in go route coverage on a slot receiver.

    Like

    • Will (The Other One)

      Yeah, that kind of stuff just isn’t fair. People that big shouldn’t move that fast (every AFC team outside of NE will eventually see that and say “that might be how we contain Gronk.”)

      Like

  5. sectionzalum

    my favorite play of the game was john atkins blocking all the way down the field on the 4th quarter pick 6. no lack of effort there

    Like

  6. peacedogattack

    I find it interesing how many tween-the-tackles run plays we’ve had blow up by what seems to be backside pursuit/crash downs. It happened in our first 3 series against Vandy, then disappeared for a spell (Vandy having the ball all the time was a factor), then we had a couple of good drives, then it was back. I felt like there were more plays like that against ULM, actually, and this is contributing to Chubb’s “quietness”.

    I don’t know what you would do normally to deal with this, as it’s likely a combination of factors (some timely run blitzes e.g.). Maybe attack the outside more, which Schottenheimer seems so reluctant to do that it makes me think he’s still too stuck in pro mode (I like how a friend put it, there’s a difference between a pro-style offense and a “pro offense”). We ran two tosses and a jet sweep and that was it against the Dores (all 3 plays were positive gains, the shortest was Chubb getting to the corner in the redzone for like a 5 yard gain).

    Barber’s kickoffs have been excellent but not sure what to make of the punting. I thought Wynn was much better this week as well.

    Floyd sure is getting held a lot. Haven’t seen it this much since Pollack. Naturally we’re not getting calls meanwhile we get dinged for a hold. That’s football. I guess.

    Like

    • Rp

      The backside crash is countered by the QB faking the handoff and running a naked boot to that side. Works much better when the QB is mobile, but still would have worked with Lambert as there would have been no one to that side. I noticed that too.

      Like

    • Maybe attack the outside more, which Schottenheimer seems so reluctant to do that it makes me think he’s still too stuck in pro mode (I like how a friend put it, there’s a difference between a pro-style offense and a “pro offense”).

      That’s the truthiness to my “NFLAIDS” comment. They don’t run those toss sweeps / naked boots with great frequency in the NFL because NFL LBs are faster than most you’ll see in college and your QB will get killed. Your friend’s comment is very apropos. I’m hoping we start getting away from the “pro offense” and back to the “pro-style”.

      Like

    • Russ

      I think Murray (and Mason?) would’ve checked out of that call or adjusted the protection a bit. Twice (at least) our RB was run down from behind because we didn’t block the guy.

      Given Lambert’s short time in the program, I’m wondering if he can make those calls yet.

      Like

      • peacedogattack

        That’s another good point; I wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case. New QBs are behind in that area.

        And it was more than 2 times, but less than ULM. On drive #3 – when we got the third and short offsides – Chubb had runs of 5 and 4 yards where backside players slowed him down (he still got 9 yards because he’s Nick Chubb, but he was basically bottled up at the LOS). It definitely happened in the second half once we seemed to go back to the first half gameplan (after going up 24-6).

        Like

    • Uglydawg

      good words, peacedog.

      Like

  7. 81Dog

    I’d rather be talking about how we made a blowout a lesser but still comfortable win than how we needed OT to beat an FCS team. I’m not saying we don’t have stuff to sort out, but at least OUR Heisman candidate seems to be in splendid form.

    Like

  8. Not sure why I’m in a bit of a rapid fire mode this morning with my thoughts, but overall I agree with you. I hope to see more creativity out of the play calling / competency from the QB going forward, but there were signs of decency in the 3rd quarter as you stated. I made a half-assed joke about it in my earlier comment, but I do believe there’s some truth to the “NFLAIDS” meme just considering how conservative NFL coaches tend to be compared to college coaches (I honestly thought we were going to full NFL against ULM and try and sit on a 14 pt lead for 3 1/2 quarters).

    Hopefully that was THE brain fart game of the year and it’s out of the system now. While it wasn’t pretty, every team gets a game or two like that a season where nothing seems to go your way and we still nearly covered the damn spread against a conference team on the road. Nobody’s mistaking Vandy for Alabama, but given it’s a team that Georgia historically (pre-Richt) struggles with on the road – I’ll take a 17 point win.

    Not sure if there’s something in the Nashville water, but it’s insane to me that the last two trips to Nashville will likely result in the referees getting disciplined (I can’t imagine there’s any way they don’t after the WTF HANDS TO THE FACE call).

    Like

    • BosnianDawg

      Speaking of officials, is there anything that can be done about the nonsense they were pulling this weekend? Other than the imaginary hands to the face call, there were at least three times where you can see Floyd being held in the replay of a successful play by Vandy.

      Like

      • Uglydawg

        If you were Butch Jones you could openly bitch about it. If CMR does, he’ll get suspended for the rest of the decade.

        Like

        • Mayor

          In the past (i.e. the Adams administration with Red Panties as AD) I think those things just went by the wayside without comment to the SEC front office. These days it is my impression that complaints are actually being made by Jere Morehead to the Commish through McCheap–and pretty vocally, too. When it is something really ridiculous like the hands to the face penalty against Floyd you can bet Ol’ Jere is on the mother. I know that he damn near got into an argument with Mike Slime over the game-ending helmet to helmet hit (uncalled by Penn Wagers) on Murray by Auburn DE Dee Ford. Slime told Morehead to “stop whining” and Morehead told Slime that Georgia wasn’t going to just take things like that any more. I actually thing that no-call and Morehead’s reaction is the reason Wagers isn’t reffing in the SEC any more.

          Like

          • Uglydawg

            nice insight..thanks Mayor. But wasn’t Murray flattened in the SEC championship game by a ‘Bama player too? Another no-call.
            I still suggest that each SEC head coach be allowed to ban at least two refs from officiating a game they play for a year. If two coaches ban a ref in the same year..he’s fired.

            Like

    • Bulldog Joe

      Like the 2013 game in Nashville it was nationally televised by CBS.

      In both games, I have no doubt the officiating crew was told to keep the score “reasonably close” to keep the number of viewers and ratings up for its advertisers.

      CBS provides $55 million-plus to the SEC each year. It would be hopelessly naiive to think the SEC would not be interested in CBS getting a good return on its investment.

      Like

  9. Always good to read the senator’s synopsis of the game.
    Always good when I agree with him.

    Like

  10. illini84

    A muffed kick is a kick that was touched by the receiving team.This was not.

    Like

  11. Granthams replacement

    Forgot to put Chris Mayes in the good section. He was a force in the middle.

    Like

    • Will (The Other One)

      ‘Nother good point. Seeing a DT/NG just destroy their center gives me hope that some of the run D issues are getting sorted.

      Like

  12. Ugajeff

    Agree on Mayes. He played ax well as I’ve seen him inside ever.

    Also, I didn’t like the onside kick alignment either. Put 2 back to split the field you must cover or that had a decent chance of being trouble every time.

    Still-we have lost games up there with even less going wrong, Vandy D may prove to be pretty good actually. I think they are better than SC so far.

    Like

  13. ChicagoDawg

    Senator, well done as always. With so much breathless, hyperbolic reaction on message boards and other media outlets this place is always a respite that offers up reason and thoughtfulness.

    Like

  14. UGA85

    I think what many of us are looking for is this: our level of play to match our level of talent. Our level of talent this year is ridiculous, much closer to Alabama than to Vanderbilt. Our play needs to reflect that. There is no team with talent comparable to ours until (and except?) Bama. We should get better, and winning ugly may be necessary for now, but should not be an ongoing pattern for this team.

    Like

    • DawgPhan

      Good point about UGA being closer to Bama than Vandy.

      UGA 31-14 over Vandy 17 point road win
      Bama 37-10 over MIdd Tenn State 27 point home win

      Vandy is ranked slightly ahead of MSU in FEI.

      So yeah that seems about right. UGA and Bama had about the same weekend. Thanks for pointing that out.

      Like

      • UGA85

        Well, if you feel that our level of play matches Bama’s thus far, then I guess we see things differently. I personally don’t think the team that beat Vandy would beat Bama right now, but I certainly leave room for you to feel otherwise. The good news is that we did not play Bama last weekend, and I feel that our level of play will improve. The game in three weeks should be a great measuring stick for our program.

        Like

        • DawgPhan

          So you think that Bama’s level of play from this weekend was significantly greater than UGA’s? Based on what measure? UGA beat a better team on the road.

          Like

          • UGA85

            Bama decisively beat a good Wisconsin game in their opener. Their game this week was, to me, a sleepwalking, out of conference snoozer game. But don’t get me wrong. I think Bama is beatable. We have a better running back, a better (on paper) offensive line, and an athletic, well-coached defense. The quarterbacks are about even. My point is just that our level of play has to improve to match the Bama of week one. I expect it will, and I think that game should be a classic.

            Like

            • Mayor

              We have one more game to get ready for Bama. How the Dawgs play against SC will have a lot to do with how they play against Bama IMHO.

              Like

            • Biggus Rickus

              I don’t think Georgia is completely overmatched against Alabama or anything, but I don’t know on what you’re basing the idea that QBs are about even.

              Like

              • Will (The Other One)

                Neither Coker nor Bateman have looked great. But I will say Bama’s OLine is performing at a higher level than ours so far (though thankfully not at the level they were in 2012.) I’d feel a lot more optimistic if our passing game could connect on some deep passes though, as I don’t see us putting up a ton of rushing yards on that front 7.

                Like

                • Biggus Rickus

                  Oh, I don’t think they have AJ McCarron or anything over there, but based on the Wisconsin game, they have shown more ability to make plays than either Lambert or Ramsey (though in Ramsey’s case, he hasn’t played enough to evaluate much as a fan).

                  Like

      • Uglydawg

        What UGA85 said.
        And Saban will be a holy terror getting it straightened out..fixed…while CMR is reflective and relaxed and seems to be making exuses about having a young team.
        That game was a watershed moment for me. After it, I realized that I am becoming JCDAWG83.
        Y’all help me.

        Like

        • Russ

          That’s true. I think Richt went fishing today and tomorrow. He obviously doesn’t GAS because I have yet to see him have an aneurysm on the sideline. [/sarcasm]

          Like

          • DawgPhan

            what we need is not Mcelwain level come apart in a head coach. I know players always respond to that.

            I bet that CMR doesnt even watch film.

            Like

          • Uglydawg

            I hope while he sat there fishing, he got introspective. Look..he’s a good coach but he needs to step it up. The thread that just came out showing that Lambert’s stance tipped Vandy off to which plays were passes vs which were running plays is another indicator that CMR just might be a “low energy guy”…Even HS coaches see and fix that kind of a problem.

            Like

            • The thread that just came out showing that Lambert’s stance tipped Vandy off to which plays were passes vs which were running plays…

              Whoa, whoa, whoa, hoss. Seth didn’t say that.

              Like

              • Uglydawg

                WTF..Bluto…you’re supposed to be on the other end of this blog right now..not way back here policing my statements 🙂
                I didn’t say that Seth “said” that. I said that the article “showed” that.
                Hell, it could be a non sequitor. I do that sometimes.
                I suppose I made the assumption…even in highschool coaches watch film and pick up little stuff like that. Maybe Vandy didn’t. Anyway, I doubt it’s a problem that a defense won’t exploit…that’s closer to my point.

                Like

                • 69Dawg

                  It wouldn’t be the first time a UGA QB had some tells. I’m old and can’t remember which Richt QB it was but the coaches found out after it came out in the press. Something about the way he stood to receive the ball in the shotgun. Help a senior citizen out here.

                  Like

                • adam

                  It was Joe Cox and it was exactly the same issue.

                  Like

  15. ugadawgguy

    I assure you, I am generally not an “officials are against us” conspiracy theorist. But the officiating in Saturday’s game was the most overtly lopsided I’ve seen in years — maybe since the LSU game in which AJ Green was penalized for excessive celebration ( https://youtu.be/E-qccCuL4nQ ). That was the worst call in a game full of bad ones.

    Who was leading that officiating crew at Vanderbilt? Is he Penn Wagers’s replacement? I’m only half-joking. Maybe less.

    Like

    • Mayor

      I also thought the reffing was one-sided Vandy’s way. I’m pretty sick and tired of that. We need to ID the guys who are doing this (it’s not always the Ref himself) and get them fired. At minimum get things arranged so they can’t officiate UGA games any more.

      Like

    • Somebody got paid to make sure UGA didn’t cover. That hands to the face call was insane. Never heard an announcer scream “WHAAAT!?!?” after a shitty call before. Heard it Saturday.

      Like

  16. paul

    This weekend should tell us a lot about the playbook. Have we been keeping it under wraps? Are we keeping it simple to accommodate a quarterback who has only had a month or so in the system? Or is our new OC just and ultraconservative play caller? That’s certainly the knock on him by my NFL watching friends. We shall see.

    Like

  17. No comment on the kicker since I got scolded for it in the preseason. LOL! I agree with most everything, though. I didn’t like that Chubb didn’t get a TD and, to be honest, I don’t necessarily agree with giving his backups entire series or large chunks of.

    Like

  18. Lakatos Intolerant

    IMO, you either accept Richt/Schotty are playing the guy that gives us the best chance to win (at this moment), or you think the coaches are purposefully sabotaging the team, which is laughable. Even more than some of the mechanical stuff that’s been discussed here, I saw a guy who didn’t appear comfortable in the pocket for a lot of the game but particularly the first half. Lambert’s ‘oh shit’ clock seems to be going off too early at times, causing him to bail when it isn’t necessary, which then can lead to some wonky mechanics. And I’ll admit he looked a little more awkward/less athletic when he was on the move this game. I thought protection was pretty good for the most part so he’s got to learn to trust the pocket and understand that could mean taking a hit/sack occasionally. Other than game experience, I’m not sure what can be done to teach the more instinctual, cerebral aspect of hanging in the pocket, recognizing/feeling pressure even if only seen/felt peripherally, etc. I also thought it was a little strange there seemed to be a concerted effort to get Ramsey in a rhythm with a couple high percentage throws when Lambert could probably use some of that same sequencing of plays.

    Couple other streams of consciousness:
    – Zo has to be smarter. I understand he’s a big dude and it’s a football play, and he was probably aiming for the chest… but he’s there on time and is going to get a big hit regardless so just drive through the midsection. That’s going to be called 100% of the time.
    – “Hands team” alignment for the pooch was interesting. The ball is oblong and is prone to take unusual bounces. We’ve had enough issues countering non-traditional kickoffs the last 2-3 years that you’d think we’d have a better plan in place for all situations by now.

    Like

    • Mayor

      I think Zo was coached to believe that if he wrapped up on the tackle targeting WOULDN’T be called. A lot of coaches and commentators have said that publicly and in the media. Obviously that is completely wrong.

      Like

      • Biggus Rickus

        It’s not the wrapping up. It’s the contact at the head. It didn’t help that he also lowered his head briefly and caught the QB’s chin with the crown of his helmet.

        Like

    • Russ

      Disagree. Flakey targeting call and Carter made a form tackle, as I’m sure he was taught. It was about as bad as the calls the last time we were in Nashville.

      Like

      • Lakatos Intolerant

        I don’t disagree it was a form tackle and it wasn’t dirty, you just can’t put the crown of your helmet into the opposition’s face mask/neck area. It will be called every time, especially with the assistance of replay. I think he was going for the chest and either misjudged or the target changed (or both). My point was that he can get just as good a hit by targeting the midsection, and he won’t risk a ref flagging him for borderline hits (and then getting the chance to see it over and over on replay). Anything close to be “targeting” is going to go against the defender, just the way college football is these days.

        Sorry but Zo’s hit was nothing like Ramik’s in 2013. Ramik went shoulder to chest. The worst part about Ramik’s was the rule at the time – targeting was an automatic ejection unless the ref overturned it after seeing the replay. It should have been overturned but no ref has the backbone to make that call. At least now they can throw a flag and then go look at a replay to determine if ejection is warranted.

        Like

        • As far as what happened with Wilson, at the time the rule was that the targeting penalty itself couldn’t be overturned, only the player ejection. Which is what happened.

          Agree with you about Carter. Like it or not, it fell within the letter of the law. Plus, it was late.

          Like

          • Lakatos Intolerant

            Ah yes, the ‘we no longer think you’re guilty – and you can keep playing – but we’ll still fuck you over with the flag and a new set of downs for the opposition’ rule. Was spouting without remembering the rule exactly so thanks for correcting me. Whole situation was infuriating, I’ll be back after a quick walk around the building so I can cool off…

            Like

        • Uglydawg

          Lakatos..”It will be called every time”…true unless you’re hitting Aaron Murray…then it’s a no-call.

          Like

        • 69Dawg

          The minute the guys helmet came off I knew he was gone. I think the refs are calling this a lot at the beginning of the year to put the fear of God into the teams. I watched at least 3 DQ’s Saturday in the 12 o’clock games for targeting.

          Like

  19. Irwin R. Fletcher

    1) The damage the D did on Saturday was without if not the most physically gifted player, then 1A, on the field. Bellamy did nice work, but I don’t think McCrary gets as much time to scramble away from Jenkins in the 2nd half if Carter is still in the game.
    2) Dominic Sanders is a pretty good football player.
    3) I think the issue with Lambert was how bad that first half was. He wasn’t close on a lot of those throws. Should have thrown a pick. That’s what you just can’t have…you can have some bad throws, but you have to mix them in with some good ones.
    4) I hate Nashville. Just a bizzaro game everytime. But I’d like to posit that we typically play like that in the Carolina game. Lose. Then spend the rest of the year trying to catch up. If we can some how replace the Carolina brain-fart loss with a Vandy ugly win game, and now turn it on the rest of the way, I’ll be thrilled. For all the wailing, this is only the 2nd time in the past 7 seasons that UGA has started 2-0.

    Like

    • UGA85

      That last sentence is a heck of a statement. Wow.

      Like

    • I like your #3…I am no QB coach, and I can’t speak to the mechanics of a good throw, but I have seen enough football to know that throwing with both feet off the ground is an INT waiting to happen (Unless you play for Corch–and it is a jump pass by). Lambert jumped and threw one like that deep in our end with nobody within 5 yards of him. Eventually that and scrambling unnecessarily is going to be costly. Can somebody tell me how the new 6’5″ qb has as many tipped balls in 2 games and the 6’0″ qb from a few years ago had in 2 years?

      Like

      • *…pass by design)

        **…in 2 games AS the 6’0″…

        shit.

        Like

      • Mayor

        I think Lambert is still affected by what happened to him at UVa. He(like all QBs) has a clock in his head that tells him the ball has to go–now! Only at UVa that clock had to be really fast to avoid a sack. When he gets used to better protection and more time he’ll get better at that. The problems seemed to be in the first half. I thought Lambert played well in the second half.

        Like

  20. AusDawg85

    Lambert’s first pass was a dump off to Chubb over the middle he dropped. His next few incompletions were to receivers that were well covered. The first play “Chubb between the tackles” that got stuffed is the same play Chubb breaks open in the next series for a near TD. Of course CBS is calling it conservative…his RB playmakers are making plays, the D and ST are helping with scoring, we were not in danger of losing that game, and it’s Lambert’s 2nd start in the system. Pretty sure the coaches see..and understand…more than us armchair HC’s. Not all is well, but it’s probably not time to start Bauta and run triple reverse WR option passes either.

    I enjoyed beating Vandy. Feel confident and looking forward to hammering the OBC but always respect that he can be dangerous. Didn’t feel confident about Bama 6 weeks ago and nothing has changed that. Just win the SEC East and let’s see what happens in Atlanta. Jeez.

    Like

    • Please don’t try to make excuses for Lambert’s play. Just stop, seriously.

      Like

      • Macallanlover

        Mr.Ramsey, we all want to see more of your son in action too, and maybe we will this Saturday. If he is the right guy, it will work out for him soone enough. DJ Shockley was more talented and had to wai for his chance but his Dad didn’t come on here and whine 40 times a day. As someone noted earlier, this isn’t a conspiracy against him. The coach who made this decision has evaluated talent at a much higher level and his boss, Mark Richt has coached 2 Heisman QBs, a #1 draft pick QB, and the all-time SEC passing leader. Your repetitive comments on this one obsession is tiring. I am not saying Ramsey, or Bauta, may not end up being our guy but until then we should all support our QB.

        Like

      • Irwin R. Fletcher

        I think his reflections are a little optimistic, but I don’t think they are ‘excuses’ either.

        Chubb and Blazevich both had drops. They didn’t let Lambert throw on 1st down the entire first half.

        There were some bad throws but his throws were on 2nd and 9 (Chubb drop), 3rd and 9, 3rd and 6, 3rd and 6, and 1st and 15 (which I don’t count as a 1st down since they had already had a 5 yard run that got called back for holding). Vandy’s defense is good enough to be able to play the pass on clear passing situations.

        When they finally started mixing it up in the 3rd Quarter, they put together the makings of three good drives (with the first one getting stopped because of a freshman holding penalty on Godwin after Michel already had the first down and then a sack).

        It was a bit of a perfect storm of conservative play calling and ugly throws in that first half. That’s not excuses…just the way I see it.

        Like

  21. diving duck

    What exactly does Schott have to do to lose the ‘vanilla’ criticism? Outside of a better downfield passing game (which we saw reasons why he avoids that) it has looked like UGA football.

    Like

    • Macallanlover

      I think the toss sweep is the first reaction I have to your question. It has been a staple that has worked well for UGA. Secondly, just more of a passing mix, not just the deep throws. I am not concerned that we cannot win with what we have seen against the first four opponents, but it would help our OL and RBs if we reduced the clutter in the middle and made the safeties play back a few steps.

      Like

      • adam

        To be fair, outside of the Clemson game, we didn’t run many toss sweeps last year either. Lots of inside runs.

        Like

        • Macallanlover

          Take your word for it but I could have sworn Chubb and Gurley getting yardage out of that. So I will correct myself, we need to utilize that play with Chubb, Michel, and Marshall and do it often…especially led by a FB. Dives up the middle against Bama will not be effective. Make their ends play contain, or let their CB face the wrath of a bad ass FB in full stride. Will stop them from crashing from the back side on every running play.

          Like

  22. Addr

    The overall impression I got was that this is a young team with a huge amount of upside that still needs more snaps to settle in. But what is truly encouraging is that they didn’t seem to get rattled, and took care of business. In previous years I would’ve fully expected Georgia to play down to the level of its opponent, but even if there were hiccups in this game, you never truly got the feeling that the result was in doubt.

    Defense: despite the youth at key positions, this defense feels special. Even with the absurd number of plays that Vandy ran, these guys consistently stepped up, which is hugely encouraging. They didn’t seem to let off the gas like against ULM.

    Offense: constipated is the right word. Whether that was because Schotty is intentionally keeping the playbook vanilla or the offense has taken a big step back remains to be seen. I’m reserving judgment until this team is truly tested. Lambert’s play was by far the biggest red flag for me. If the offensive philosophy is somewhat a continuation of last year, he’s got a LOT of work to do. He came pretty close to making some huge mistakes that could’ve made this game turn out a lot different.

    Special Teams: feast or famine. On the one hand, things like the bobbled punt/first down and the pooch kick should never happen, and could be chocked up to bad luck rather than lack of preparation. And on the other hand, there is a lot to be excited about, especially McKenzie and the return game.

    Like

  23. doofusdawg

    Dolt call.

    Like

  24. Uglydawg

    Here’s a “what if” from somebody who’s been doing a lot of bitching (Ugly bitching) for the last couple of days.
    What if the coaches know Ramsey is the real deal and don’t want to show it to Saban? What if they want Saban to prepare to stop the running game because he believes Georgia can’t throw it much..and then Ramsey comes out and wows the world? It could be, couldn’t it?
    THAT would be the CMR I’ve been seeking!

    Like

    • Tlkdawg

      I believe that is the CMR that doesn’t exist…..sadly

      Like

    • Merk

      That would take Evil Richt from greatness to Legend status.

      Like

    • So you propose the evil Richt theory. I kind of like it. I just think the qb situation is our coaches’ effort to show Ramsey tough love. The simplest explanation , to my way of thinking…(and there are those who say that is my ONLY way of thinking) is that Lambert is the more disciplined and harder working player. Even a one eyed soccer coach could see that Ramsey is the more gifted/talented QB so the most rational explanation has to be coaches are dangling play time out there in front of Ramsey to see if they can get him to work a little hard and/or smarter.

      Like

  25. Uglydawg

    As far as the disappropriate number of plays ran…(and someone pointed this out yesterday..not my original thought)…when you run back a punt you get zero plays after the exchange. Same for running back a pic 6, That gave Vandy a big advantage and #s swing. This is one example of how stats can be very misleading. In fact..if a team ran back every kick or interception..they’d have zero plays run in a blowout.

    Like

  26. W Cobb Dawg

    Brother Bluto, ya got to give the D more credit. “There is ridiculous defensive speed.” That’s it?! The D played with a lot of heart and overcame a litany of O, ST, and officiating obstacles. If there’s anything that gives me optimism coming out of this game, its that our D is tough and dependable.

    Like

  27. All things considered – I think these first two weeks have gone pretty well.

    We won pretty handily against Vanderbilt (honestly did anyone think we were in danger of losing – even after the pooch kick?) and we still have a long way to improve.

    We haven’t suffered any major injuries as far as I can see. Chubb leads the conference in rushing. Defense has only allowed 2 touchdowns in each game. There is work to do in the passing game but we haven’t had any egregious errors either.

    Special teams have been great to confusing to brutal but there is still the upside of talent there.

    We need to improve execution this week but there are a LOT of other schools with far bigger problems than us. One of them is our opponents for this Saturday.

    Arkansas has issues. Auburn has issues. UT still looks not ready for primetime. ND has now lost their starting RB and QB for the season (think they like the grad transfer rule now?). Oregon probably has to run the Pac12 unscathed or they might be out of the playoff.

    If they work hard in practice this week and stay focused on Saturday’s game, we should have more than enough to win easily.

    Like

    • Russ

      When it was 24-14 and we just screwed the pooch (see what I did there?), I was worried we were about to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Up until that point, it was looking like 2013. Remember, we had a pick 6 in that game as well. Luckily, our pick 6 this time was a big swing, potentially a 14 point swing.

      Yes, Vandy still had work to do, but I still wasn’t sure how much we were going to continue to “help” them. So count me as at least one person that was a little more than worried at that point.

      Like

  28. DawgPhan

    SER guy. we are 2-0. think about how long it has been since we started 2-0 with no more suspension, injuries, or other non-sense.

    probably more recently than I remember, but damn it seems like forever.

    2-0 with the ‘cocks coming to athens. seems like a pretty good spot to be in.

    Like

  29. PTC DAWG

    The excellent. No turnovers.

    Like

  30. mamadawg

    I’m a little worried, not paranoid yet, but worried. What is Richt doing with this quarterback situation? Does it seemsurreal to anyone besides me? What do the coaches see that I’m not seeing? Make me believe, PLEASE!!

    With a top tier Heisman candidate in our ranks, all the defenses we play will want to be in the “I Stuffed Chubb” club. Remember last year? We had an anemic quarterback whose shots of brilliance were few and far between. Our backs had a rough season, they got banged up pretty good. We couldn’t win the big games. I don’t want to see that AGAIN!!! Not again!!!@!@

    I really like the way the defense played, warts and all. Mackenzie for President, that boy can run!

    I have tickets to the South Carolina game, first time ever at that game. I’ve never been to a Spurrier/GA game and I want to see us annihilate him and I want to see him throw in visor in agony in person, before I die. Please God, let it be this Saturday!

    I miss Bobo, not the cute Bobo, but yeah the Road Warrior Bobo, I miss him.

    Like

  31. Bulldog Joe

    I believe DeAndre Woods is due for a haircut.

    Like