Daily Archives: August 15, 2023

Drink up!

Shot.

Specifically, the PASS Act would:

  • Protect higher education institutions by:
    1. Ensuring that schools, conferences, and associations are not liable for their efforts to comply with the PASS Act.
    2. Prohibiting NIL agreements that involve alcohol, drugs, or conflict with existing school and conference licenses.

Chaser.

Man, I’ve waited so long to use that rhetorical device in this context.  Feels good.

By the way, Senators, it looks like the schools don’t need your protection — at least in this particular area.

22 Comments

Filed under Alabama, It's Just Bidness, Political Wankery

When you have three quarterbacks…

LOL.  Remind me never to attend a Kirby Smart presser.

Smart took umbrage with one blogger’s question Saturday evening about the Bulldogs’ “diversity” at quarterback and how they go about preparing for “QB run” when quarterbacks are not allowed to be hit during practice.

Blogger, please.  But I digress.  Smart’s point about the position isn’t one I suspect many Georgia fans assumed.

“I don’t really see any of our three quarterbacks as quarterback-run people,” Smart said following the Bulldogs’ first scrimmage of preseason camp. “I mean, I didn’t see Stetson (Bennett) that way. Could Stetson run? Yeah. But we didn’t design runs. Maybe a few in the red area, but we didn’t design runs. We don’t really want our quarterback physically getting hit.”

… Despite their supposed acumen for carrying the football, Smart said there are no plans to create special QB run packages for either Vandagriff or Stockton, who are expected to open the season as backups to Beck.

“Not the case,” Smart said sharply. “Now can one of them maybe run a little better than the others? Maybe a little bit. These three guys are all three pretty good athletes. I don’t know how diverse they are. When I hear diverse, I think, ‘oh, they’re all three really different.’ They’re all three really more the same than they are different.”

Which leads to this big picture take:

“We will not have an extensive quarterback run package. We just don’t. We’re going to give the ball to our backs and we’re going to throw the ball to the perimeter and let our skill guys do things with it.”

Whatever else 2023 may bring, “have the quarterback run the damn ball, Bobo” apparently won’t be a part of it.

21 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Strategery And Mechanics

Inevitable

Hey, you know how some folks in certain quarters have had the audacity to question whether, in the coming age of the 12-team playoff, we’d see teams rest their starters at season’s end, if there wasn’t much at stake?  And you know how other folks in certain quarters poo-poo’ed those concerns, brushing them aside because, they say, players want to play, or rivalries or college football isn’t wired that way?

Tell me which group Dabo Swinney falls into.

Resting starters before the playoffs is something that has happened for years in the NFL. Clemson head coach Dabo Swinney believes it will soon be happening in college football, too.

Swinney was asked at the ACC Football Kickoff event last month about the College Football Playoff expanding and some possible ramifications. With a 12-team playoff, Swinney believes some teams will rest starters late in the season if they appear to have a playoff spot locked up.

“I don’t think there’s any question that’s going to happen,” Swinney said. “I mean you’re basically kind of going to an NFL model from a playoff standpoint. The NFL has what, 14 teams? Is that what they’ve got? So you’re going to 12. It’s unfortunate. There’s always unintended consequences and that’s one of them.”

If a team is undefeated headed into its conference championship game or last regular season game and can afford a loss, Swinney predicts that some won’t risk suffering an injury.

He expects quarterbacks and other top players to sit out from time to time.

“That’ll happen. There will be situations, just like you see on any big tournament type sport. You see that in the NBA. You see that in baseball. You see it certainly in the NFL where they’re in the playoffs,” Swinney said. “I think that’s one of the downsides, one of the negative consequences. Again, [expanding the playoff] will probably still be a net good, but you adjust to it.”

Eh, what does he know?  He’s just a P5 head coach who wants to get his team in the CFP.

The powers that be want college football to become NFL-lite, because they’re convinced there’s more money in it.  The rest of us will just have to take Dabo’s advice and adjust to that.  Oh, and keep our wallets open.

29 Comments

Filed under BCS/Playoffs

Can Georgia pull off the wire-to-wire trick this season?

How could the Dawgs fall short?  Let Groo count the ways

1) The perfect storm. Georgia’s last home loss was a sleepy noon shocker in 2019 at the hands of South Carolina, a 20+ point underdog. Combine a disinterested Georgia team, a single big play, and four turnovers, including a pick-six right before halftime, with an uncharacteristic missed Blankenship field goal in overtime, and you got just enough to hand Georgia its lone regular season loss and kept the Bulldogs out of the playoff. Kirby Smart admittedly didn’t do a good job of “getting (their) ass ready to play.” Georgia might have been able to overcome that and snap out of it in time most days. Will Muschamp’s Gamecock defense was opportunistic enough and Georgia’s 2019 offense limited enough that South Carolina stretched it out to overtime and made the outcome a crapshoot.

Georgia will have a lot of games in 2023 in which they’re heavy favorites. A weak home schedule, especially in September, will feature several games in front of sub-capacity crowds sapped by the late-summer heat. Those fans, many of whom have decided the season comes down to the trip to Knoxville, will be disappointed if the team looks anything other than dominant in its home games. The team – with visions of a threepeat and basking in its #1 ranking – will have to find its own motivation each week, and, yes, South Carolina is among the home opponents again. Avoiding “that game” isn’t just a problem for the offense: Stephen Garcia made a career for himself in South Carolina’s 2010 upset of Alabama. We know that obvious fundamentals like turnovers and special teams can give even lopsided underdogs a chance. The challenge, as always, is seeing each week as an opportunity to improve and play to the program’s standard. It’s not always so easy.

2) Waning explosiveness. Georgia’s lack of explosiveness was a major theme in 2019. Without much of a deep threat and a razor-thin tight end position, defenses swarmed the line of scrimmage and made for a compact area of the field to attack. The constrained offense (along with the turnovers) played a role in the South Carolina upset but also left Georgia in a number of close games in which they had to lean on a very good defense. It’s hard to imagine an offense with Brock Bowers and Arian Smith – not to mention Dominic Lovett, Oscar Delp, or Ladd McConkey – having issues with explosiveness, but there’s someone else on the other end of those passes. The quarterback position remains unsettled heading deep into August though the depth chart looks solid. Georgia’s next quarterback will have to be as adept as Stetson Bennett at generating explosive plays, and Mike Bobo will have to be creative spreading the ball around to a dangerous group of receivers and tight ends. If the quarterback can’t get the ball downfield consistently, an offense with a banged-up group of tailbacks will find it difficult to move the ball.

Turnovers were a minor issue at Missouri in 2022 (-2) and didn’t help things, but we also saw problems with explosiveness that had begun to creep up in the Kent State game. With Missouri playing tight to the line of scrimmage and blitzing often, Georgia couldn’t get sustained success on the ground, and the screens and short passes that were an extension of the running game earlier in the season weren’t available. Stetson Bennett completed just 56% of his attempts at an unremarkable 7.25 yards per attempt. Georgia was held to their lowest SEC scoring output of the year until that frozen, windy game at Kentucky. Fortunately the defense never broke and the offense remained composed enough to find something that worked. Georgia had too much talent to completely slip back into its 2019 shell, but a lackluster night from the offense can be enough to keep even a mid-table opponent within a score or two.

3) Overwhelmed defense. Auburn and Oklahoma 2017. LSU 2019. Florida 2020. Alabama 2021. Ohio State 2022. Even the best Georgia defenses during the Kirby Smart era have found themselves in shootouts. Sometimes, as with Alabama in 2021, you get a second chance. Sometimes, as with Oklahoma or Ohio State, the offense can keep up. But those shootout wins have been the exception. Georgia has allowed 30 points or more in ten games since 2017. They’ve only won three of those games (Oklahoma 2017, LSU and Ohio State 2022.) In Georgia’s nine losses since 2017, they’ve given up at least 35 points in seven of those games.

Giving up 30 points doesn’t happen often – ten times in six seasons and usually in the postseason – but it does happen frequently enough and with enough regularity that the possibility has to be considered. It’s true that most of these high-scoring games have come at the hands of Heisman candidates and known explosive offenses. Georgia’s defense isn’t getting blindsided by Kentucky or Georgia Tech. It does suggest what we’ve come to accept as common knowledge: really good offenses are hard to stop by even the best defenses. That realization was the root of the crisis that spurred changes in Georgia’s own offense after 2019, and during their title run Georgia featured a high-performing offense of their own.

What does one of these offense look like? Ian Boyd put it like this (h/t Blutarsky): “…if you don’t have an elite space force or the tactics to beat a team with skill, and it just comes down to trench play, Georgia will whoop you.” It’s possible that Georgia won’t face an offense with those traits until the postseason. LSU and Alabama aren’t on the regular season schedule. We saw first-hand the breadth of Ohio State’s receiving talent, and USC has a special playmaker at quarterback in a proven system, but, again, those potential challenges are still hypothetical at this point.

Tennessee jumps out as the regular season opponent most likely to challenge Georgia’s defense. The Vols lost the quarterback and top receivers that led to their breakthrough season in 2022. They still return several productive receivers and add an important transfer in Dont’e Thornton. Kirby Smart has done well to keep the up-tempo Tennessee offense in check, but it doesn’t take much for them to get on a roll. Lane Kiffin and Hugh Freeze have been known for productive and explosive offenses in the past, but they might fall short of the level of skill that has given Georgia’s defense the most trouble.

Of those three, I’d rate the third one as the most logical threat, but it’s hard to see anyone other than possibly the Vols getting Georgia into a regular season shoot out.  All bets are off come the SECCG and CFP, of course.

The illogical threat is the one he mentions first:  South Carolina.  You’d like to think Smart will be prepared to dodge a perfect storm scenario, but all I can say is that I hope I’m glad the game isn’t a nooner.

What do y’all think of Groo’s list?

30 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football

“The money is pouring in, but the system is stretching fans and athletes to the breaking point.”

This is a smart piece on the steady, corrosive effect of conference realignment on both players and fans.

Every step in the recent conference realignment drama that has engulfed college sports and destroyed the Pac-12 makes sense in its own narrow way. Oregon and Washington have joined the Big 10, Colorado, Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah have joined the Big 12, and four other schools remain without a home. Sequencing is everything. It made sense for USC and UCLA to seek better money elsewhere; it made sense for Colorado to return to the Big 12; it made sense for Oregon and Washington to insulate themselves by joining the Big 10; it made sense for Arizona and Utah and Arizona State and the rest of the Pac-12 schools to desperately seek some kind of safe harbor, even if that harbor could end up being (for Cal and Stanford) the Atlantic Coast Conference.

But the accumulation of small, sensible decisions has led to wildly irrational outcomes. The longstanding system of building college athletics around geographic rivalries made its own kind of sense. Oregon and Washington, or Michigan and Ohio, will always resent one another more than USC and Rutgers. More importantly, regional proximity had the real and practical effects of allowing fans to attend road games and cutting down on the travel times that all athletes incur. We are now embracing a reality in which student athletes, already under intense pressure, will be stretched even farther by the demands of travel and practice.

What’s especially good about it is that the author doesn’t treat college athletes as a bunch of dummies, incapable of handling the academic grind.  Quite the contrary.

Contra many depictions of student athletes in the media, the vast bulk of Division I athletes across all sports are in fact interested in doing well in school, in earning their degrees, and in building careers in nonathletic fields. There’s obviously a great deal of variation from sport to sport and from athlete to athlete, but most athletes are fundamentally like other students, trying to navigate the demands of pursuing a college degree while having the equivalent of a full-time job along with plenty of travel. We should resist the assumption that even elite players in revenue sports like football and basketball don’t belong on a college campus; many of them are less academically prepared than the median student, but most of them are smart and all of them are very hard-working.

It’s illogical to think that these sprawling athletic conferences that are just now emerging aren’t going to have an impact on their academic pursuits.

Realignment will compound the “only so many hours in a day” problem for student athletes. Air travel has long been a fact of life (Pac-12 schools aren’t particularly close to one another by the standards of the Midwest or the Southeast), but it’s about to get worse. The Big Ten now spans three time zones, meaning that students need to navigate onerous time differences between the coasts. A flight from Seattle to Columbus isn’t that much longer than the Seattle to Los Angeles leg, but the time zone change makes it more physically demanding. At least in the Big Ten the West Coast schools will have the opportunity to schedule one another; if Cal and Stanford join the ACC they will effectively commit their athletes to virtually endless cross-continental travel.

And of course nonmonetary sports (which make up the balance of all student athletes) are at the mercy of football. Gymnasts, rowers, runners, and a whole host of other athletes will now need to account for travel between the Midwest, the Atlantic coast, and the Pacific coast. It is possible to do academic work in an airport, somewhat less so on an airplane, and not at all after a series of exhausting flights culminating in an elite-level athletic competition.

It sure seems to fly in the face of schools’ commitment to the academic mission.  Make sure to read the whole thing.

10 Comments

Filed under Academics? Academics., Crime and Punishment

In Athens at least, you can go home again.

As Kirby went out of his way to point out the other day, the football program has 26 UGA grads on staff.

“We have 26 UGA grads on our staff,” Smart, who has a finance degree from Georgia, said in his opening statement at SEC Media Days in Nashville. “Retention for us is the key to sustaining success.”

It’s also part of the recruiting sales pitch.

“We actually use that in our recruiting presentations,” Hartley said. “What that illustrates is Georgia’s willingness to welcome people back. The university’s willingness to say it’s not a four-year decision, it’s a 40-year decision. I’m not just going to take care of you in your time in Athens, but it does have the ability to help you find a career.”

Four of those 26 are assistant coaches:  offensive coordinator Mike Bobo, co-defensive coordinator Will Muschamp, wide receivers coach Bryan McClendon and tight ends coach Todd Hartley.  Speaking of Boom…

“This profession is different than a lot of professions,” Muschamp said in 2011 before facing Georgia for the first time at Florida. “You do your job for the school that you’re working for. … I don’t mean disrespect to anybody, but I’m loyal to people not places.”

Back at Georgia, Muschamp said last year of working with several UGA alums on the coaching staff: “All of those guys have a vested interest in the University of Georgia. Not that we didn’t at other places, but at the end of the day, this is where you went to school.”

He’ll have come full circle when he starts mocking the Gators in offseason talks with alumni.

21 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football