Kicking the sham injury can down the road

Surprise, surprise.

To address teams that are awarded an injury timeout through deceptive actions, the committee proposed a reporting and investigation process. Schools and conferences would be able to report questionable scenarios to the national coordinator of officials, who will review and provide feedback to the conference for further action. Any penalties levied would be up to the conference office or school involved.

“It is very difficult to legislate ethics, particularly when an injury timeout is being used to gain an advantage,” David Shaw said. “The small number of teams that seem to use these tactics should be addressed directly.”

The committee considered several in-game options to address this, including altering the injury timeout rule to remove the injured student-athlete for more than one play, which is the current rule. This concept was debated at length, but the committee was concerned with the additional issues that could be created and did not want to encourage players to continue to participate when injured.

Committee members discussed how the pace of play appears to be contributing to this concern. “We considered all options to address this issue, including allowing both teams an opportunity to substitute after a first down,” David Shaw said. “This is another step to consider in the future.”

I can’t wait to see the first school levy a punishment against its own head coach for this… although, now that I think about it, it’s probably a good thing McGarity isn’t in Athens now.

18 Comments

Filed under The NCAA

18 responses to “Kicking the sham injury can down the road

  1. Shorter Shaw: We want to spend more time and money on our friends as consultants to study the issue.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. spur21

    The examples I’ve seen while watching a game are pretty obvious (looking at you Brian Kelly) and could likely be monitored by one additional official in the booth. That being said it’s difficult to monitor ethics (looking at you Brian Kelly) when it comes to trying to beat a superior opponent.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. bcdawg97

    I kind of like Rick Neuheisel’s suggestion that the teams just have to stay on the field and that they can’t huddle on the sidelines. I think the player should have to sit for the rest of the possession. The keep out for more than 1 play isn’t going to affect players the way they think. Truly hurt players will come out and the ones that were going to play hurt will always do so, they aren’t coming out anyways.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. PTC DAWG

    Unfortunately, he’s gone.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. DC Weez

    There’s really a simple answer to this problem. A player that is injured must sit out at least four plays. Not perfect, but it provides a penalty for faking an injury.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Gaskilldawg

      Sure it does provide a penalty for faking an I jury but the concern is that an important player, such as Nakobi Dean, may be injured and his team needs him defending 1st and goal on the 8 and the injured guy doesn’t come out because missing 4 plays will hurt his team. They don’t want to deter injured players from letting their team know are injured.

      Like

      • Dylan Dreyer's Booty

        When I first read that there was a concern about a truly injured player not wanting to come out I briefly considered it as a legitimate concern. After all, it seems like Bowers played with a gimpy wing. But then I realized that Bowers didn’t ever act injured. What bcdawg said: “ Truly hurt players will come out and the ones that were going to play hurt will always do so, they aren’t coming out anyways.” That’s the truth and they really haven’t addressed anything. Plus, a truly injured player isn’t helping his team: a wideout with a torn ACL isn’t scoring touchdowns.

        Like

  6. It obviously happens and it’s annoying, but I just don’t think it’s something you can ever prove definitively. Making players sit out longer after an injury will only cause more injuries by forcing hurt players to keep playing. There’s no good solution…I think we’re just stuck with it.

    Like

    • junkyardawg41

      I am struggling with the “cause more injury” statement and maybe you can help me understand. Player A is “injured” and has to come off the field. Player B is hurt but not injured comes in to replace him. Player B has to play multiple plays versus one. The only difference is how injured/hurt Player A is. If he is unable to go the rest of the game, Player B is at the same risk for more injury. Maybe I am not understanding the concept of risk and injury in the scenario.

      Like

      • Skeptic Dawg

        I don’t want to speak for Bryan, but I read his comment as Player A is dinged up/hurt will not want to remove himself from the game due to the mandated missed play requirement and risks further injury.

        Like

        • junkyardawg41

          Thanks Skeptic. That makes a little more sense. Although if an official can pull a player for “concussion” like hits for player safety, I would think they could do the same for other injuries.

          Like

  7. originaluglydawg

    Does anyone think that the threat of a fine (which would never stand up to legal scrutiny unless you had a direct confession by a coach or a player) is going to keep a player from flopping with a national or even a conference championship at stake? Most schools or coaches will gladly anty up even a hundred grand if it’s the difference in first place and second place.
    I think it was Derek who pointed out (weeks ago) that the game was never intended to allow the taking of advantage of the rules to run an opponent to the brink of collapse. If the refs see a kid is winded and needs to come out, they should let him. It’s as simple as that.
    Have you ever noticed that during the bulk of the game, the side refs casually toss the ball to the ref that spots it and everyone is kind of laid back doing it…but when (some) teams decide to go HUNH, the refs expedite getting the ball spotted as if they’re working for the offense? It happens and it’s bullshit. The refs should have a standard and uniform time to recover, spot the ball and spike the timer. I’ve seen them break their asses to get the ball set when the clock was running for “favored” teams. It should be fairly standard.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. ciddawg

    There is a penalty,
    If a guy flops, its delay of game- 5 yards
    2nd time- unsportsmanlike conduct- 15 yards, loss of time out…
    Its obvious, we don’t need to pretend its not…

    Like