Maybe I’m missing something, but it sure seems like the new targeting rules are setting up as Penn Wagers’ wet dream.
2013 looks like it may go down as the best year for officiating evah.
Maybe I’m missing something, but it sure seems like the new targeting rules are setting up as Penn Wagers’ wet dream.
Targeting ejections will be reviewed, but can't be appealed after games.
— Sports internet (@Sportsinternet1) July 23, 2013
So, an ejection call can be overturned… but the 15-yard penalty will stand? HOW?
— ClevelandFootballTalk (@CFTalk) July 23, 2013
2013 looks like it may go down as the best year for officiating evah.
Filed under The NCAA
“We remember the Sugar Bowl, I think it my junior year of high school, we let Alabama beat us twice,” Brinson said of a team that also lost to the Crimson Tide in the SEC Championship game. “We’re not letting Alabama beat us twice. In the Sugar Bowl in 2018, they… thought they should have been in the playoffs and lost to Texas.” -- AB-H, 12/27/23
Well…shit.
LikeLike
You give Wagers too much credit as a man.
LikeLike
And it ain’t just the 15-yd penalty. If a player is ejected in the second half, he has to be suspended for the 1st half of the next game; i,e., if Matthews is judged to be ejected for a hit in the 2nd half of the Clemson game, he will have to sit out the first half of the SC game.
MrSEC had a good post on the subject this morning (left over from yesterday.).
LikeLike
Or, if Clowney decapitates someone in the first game, then he sits for part of ours. However, the Piss Wagers effect will GET US.
LikeLike
They are quickly turning college football officials into MLB umpires. Different strike zones and all that. I could see some crews not want to suffer the immense scorn of the fans, so they choose to just not call any targeting while others (like Wagers) who thrive on the “fame” of the position take it upon themselves to play God with the game on the field (a la Angel Hernandez).
LikeLike
The only way I can see for UGA to survive this is to go undefeated. Everyone knows if an SEC team is undefeated and ranked highly with an apparent track to the BCS game, the officials will protect the SEC’s investment. See Arkansas/Florida or UGA/LSU from a couple of years ago.
LikeLike
This.^^ If we win the Clemson game and are inside the top 5 for the USCe game, then win it without mishap, the 2008 and 2009 dream scenario for the SEC front office presents itself, i.e. the possibility of an undefeated SEC East Champion playing an undefeated SEC West Champion in the SECCG. After that Slive will see to it that both Bama and UGA get the benefit of all discretionary calls. If Wagers tries any shenanigans he will run the risk of being canned–and he knows it.
LikeLike
This is going to produce a meltdown at some point. Imagine Clowney getting tossed for a Michigan-style hit at a home game in a close one against an opponent like UF? The fans will tear the place down. I wonder how many officials would have the balls to make that call.
LikeLike
It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it!
LikeLike
Not if, but when. And I don’t think it will take long before someone is in an uproar over a questionable ejection in the first couple weeks. I just hope its not us 😉
LikeLike
Let’s not forget: the fear of litigation is causing rash changes to the fundamentals of our beloved game.
LikeLike
Do you mean that the NCAA isn’t doing this for the sake of protecting student athletes from serious long-term injury, but rather is doing this because of monetary considerations? (Gasp!)
LikeLike
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME
LikeLike