More Schotten-stats

Feel free to sneer at the level of opposition, if that’s what blows your skirt up, but the stats say Georgia’s offense ain’t missing a beat so far with its new offensive coordinator.

– Baylor, Georgia and Ole Miss have the most efficient offenses, averaging 1.3 plays per point scored. They’re followed by Texas Tech (1.4), USC (1.4), Memphis (1.5), Georgia Tech (1.6) and Arizona (1.6).

– Baylor has been the most explosive offense, with 13.3 percent of plays going for at least 20 yards. They’re followed by Ole Miss (11.6 percent), USC (11.4 percent), Georgia (11.3 percent), North Carolina (10.2 percent) and Kentucky (10.1 percent).

Efficient and explosive.  I can live with that.

Oh, and one more thing – Georgia’s first in the SEC in plays from scrimmage of ten yards or more.  And that’s despite running fewer plays per game than any other team in the conference.

About that opposition… yeah, it’s been subpar.  But isn’t this kind of statistical domination what we should expect to see from a very good offense against those defenses?

140 Comments

Filed under Georgia Football, Stats Geek!

140 responses to “More Schotten-stats

  1. sUGArdaddy

    About the competition…everyone is playing cupcakes right now. I’d argue our competition has been much stronger than many. I think the Vandy D is for real. Baylor’s schedule has been laughable and all those big 10 teams have to play all non-conference games in September. The rubber will meet the road in October, but I like what I’m seeing from Schotty.

    Like

  2. Russ

    Agree, we’ve taken care of business in the manner that we should have, including stomping Sackerlina and Spurrier, who was supposedly in our head. So far, I’m a happy camper. October will tell the story though. We can take a loss to Bama, but we have to beat the Vowels, Mizzou and the Gators. This team seems to take care of business, so hopefully we’ll all be happy at the start of November.

    Like

  3. Go Dawgs!

    Georgia’s not the only team that has faced subpar opposition thus far. That we’re above all the rest of the cupcake eaters on the stats is good enough for me.

    The good news is that all the parsing of stats and mental gymnastics of trying to put them into context ends in just four more days. How good are we? We’re about to find out. CAN’T WAIT.

    Like

  4. Merk

    According to the trolls, we are supposed to sit here and say this might be the crappiest UGA team ever, because for once in the last decade we did not open vs a good team and SC has returned to pre-2010 levels.

    Like

    • Aunt Edna

      This is the schedule most UGA fans have longed for. Damon Evans had us flying across the country for our first game trying to get the UGA “brand” out there. With the strength of the SEC I see no reason to make life that much tougher by trying to take down a ranked opponent week 1.

      Like

      • Go Dawgs!

        Flying across the country in Week 1 is no big deal. Flying across the country in Week 5 to Colorado or AZ State was the problem.

        Like

        • Mayor

          ^^This, although I don’t favor playing a ranked team week one either. Better a tune-up game at home for week one IMHO. This year’s schedule is perfect.

          Like

      • sUGArdaddy

        I’ve said it a million times, Edna. Mark Richt got 1 season since the advent of the permanent 12 game schedule in 2006 in which we play 3 cupcakes & Tech: 2012. We went 11-1 in the regular season. Nick Saban had 1 season since his arrival in 2007 that Bama played 2 Power 5 teams (which has been the norm for UGA). That season was 2010…and the Sabanator went 9-3. Guess what, the Dawgs get 3 cupcakes this year. It could be a fun one.

        Like

        • PatinDC

          Interesting observation.

          Like

        • UGA85

          I confess I have not looked up stats or specific schedules, but playing in the West has been more difficult than playing in the East for several years now. Our SEC schedule has not been very difficult when you include Kentucky and Vandy annually, along with struggling UF and UT teams.

          Like

          • Cojones

            Part of that ,”….playing in the West has been more difficult than playing in the East…..” comes from ESPN hype . That was shown to be true post season last year.

            Georgia has pretty much taken care of their West matchups through those ESPN-hyped years and I never saw it their way and still don’t. Bring’em on.

            Like

            • dawgtired

              True that. R-Kansas looks like a bottom feeder right now and TAMU struggled with them. We will see in this weeks games how East/West compares. UF vs OleMiss and UT vs Ark.

              Like

            • Mayor

              The only real difference in the East and West is 1 team at the bottom. The bottom team in the West is a more difficult out than the bottom team in the East. This “disparity” would go away if the SEC kicked the 4 interlopers out of the conference and went to a 9 team round robin schedule.

              Like

              • Cosmic Dawg

                Mmmmm….I would take Bama, LSU, and Ole Miss/Miss St/Auburn vs. Georgia, Mizzou, Tenn/Florida/South Carolina most of the last few years. I think they’ve been better top to bottom recently.

                Like

            • Biggus Rickus

              It wasn’t entirely hype. It was overblown, but there were three or four teams in the West better than anyone in the East but Georgia last year. Based on what i’ve seen so far, there are still three teams in the West better than anyone but Georgia this year. Possibly four if A&M is actually good.

              Like

            • UGA85

              Have you looked at head to head East vs. West records the last few years? It is near total domination apart from UGA. I just don’t know how anyone could say the East overall has been comparable to the West recently.

              Like

              • Cojones

                If you want to suck on that lollipop, then do so, but don’t bring Georgia into the conversation. I could care less that you buy other opinions outside the SEC and don’t listen to your own mind about judging SEC teams.

                Our two SEC losses last year were against SEC East teams and we beat the snot out of the SEC West teams.

                Don’t shine me on with that stupid ESPN rhetoric. I’ll bet you can’t vote for anyone unless Fox Nonnews ordains them. ESPN is no different when loading up your mind with their biased Big10 takes. They screwed over everyone’s minds last year and they are doing it this year as well with their nonlove of the SEC and promotion of Big10 and Pac12 teams. Their early predictions there are also fading as fast as Auburn reaching for someone else’s championships and claiming all those that were before a conscensus #1 was voted.

                When we are too lazy to investigate other teams/conferences, we shouldn’t take ESPN’s word for it. The few good pundits writing for ESPN aren’t loosed on tv like the idiot class they have chosen for this year. We have people here at gtp that pick lots better than any of those numbnuts at ESPN can, but they have a bully pulpit to influence a large number of voters as to poll selections and don’t be surprised to see no SEC team in this year’s NC unless we win out.

                Like

                • Cojones

                  If that’s a little too harsh, then I apologize. I’m venting against what ESPN planted in everyone’s minds last year about the SEC West and I disagreed with them last year. They come back later and it’s on the team letting them down when someone loses, not them being stupid about their guesses.

                  Like

                • Cosmic Dawg

                  You were way out of line with that lollipop bit…you trying to hurt his feelings?

                  Like

        • charlottedawg

          As it stands now, Alabama could be the only team on our regular season schedule that finishes ranked. I would be more than ok with that scenario.

          Like

        • Biggus Rickus

          Are you seriously arguing that Alabama lost 3 games in 2010 because they played a 3-9 Duke team that lost to Army?

          Like

  5. gastr1

    I would add having played one good defense in that mix…Vanderbilt has now played two of the top offenses of the early stats.

    Like

    • Brandon

      And held both waaaayyyy below their seasonal averages. That Vandy is gonna sneak up and get somebody

      Like

      • Go Dawgs!

        I don’t know if they’re going to sneak up and bag any big game, but the lessers among us like South Carolina and Missouri with their tire fire of an offense need to watch out. Of course, Vandy’s a dumpster fire on offense themselves so I don’t know that I anticipate them knocking off anyone serious. They’ll just scare a few teams. Their defense is legit. Each team they hold below their average offense only makes Georgia’s struggle game up there look better.

        Like

  6. A win this weekend is not imperative for us but a blowout loss does not bode well for psyche. If we sweep the East and manage a split in our West games we will be in the SEC Championship and that certainly seems like a reachable goal at the beginning of October.

    We should let it all hang out against Bama this weekend. Honestly, a loss here will not really hurt us – all of our goals will still be in place (East, SEC, Playoff.) A win will cement what some of us have thought about this team for awhile – best in the East, best in the conference and a playoff team.

    Like

    • Brandon

      Potential, maybe. But a win Saturday does not get us in the playoffs. Still got 7 more to go after that

      Like

      • Brandon

        8… SEC CH. game if we get there

        Like

      • Very true but it will confirm that this is a very good team that has chance to be great. A win will change our perceived status in the national CFB community which thinks the East team should just be happy they are cousins with the greatest collection of CFB in a single region ever.

        Like

        • Irwin R. Fletcher

          If we sweep the East

          Because that has happened…never.

          Winning this one is huge. Just like winning the next one.

          Like

          • RocketDawg

            True but I don’t think the East has ever been this bad before. Unless we shit the bed against UT or UF there is no way we lose to an East team this year. They all suck.

            Like

    • Go Dawgs!

      It’s put up or shut up time. I think we all know that the season continues with a non-divisional loss, but let’s get real. Georgia’s reputation nationally, regionally, and with recruits is on the line on Saturday. We’re getting these guys at home. We’re getting these guys when we’re healthy and we’re getting them when we’re playing well. There may be some lingering doubts about Greyson Lambert in a big game, but that would be one of the very few lingering doubts that we have about this team. Put up or shut up. If Georgia wins Saturday, they can do great things. If they don’t? Then they’re a team that can back their way into the Georgia Dome, but make plans now to visit the Outback Bowl after we lose there.

      Like

      • UGA85

        I don’t necessarily agree with you. I think we can lose to Bama, use that loss as a barometer to show us where we need to improve, and continue to get better. In fact, a loss may motivate us to win in Knoxville and Jacksonville and Atlanta.

        Like

        • Irwin R. Fletcher

          All of this ‘you don’t need to beat the West’ talk is fine…but completely ignores the reality that sweeping your cross divisional games are imperatively important to making the championship game.

          Since the conference expanded, Championship game participants are 12-0 against cross divisional opponents. You have to go back to 2010 South Carolina to find a team that lost a cross divisional game and made the championship game.

          It’s hard to run the table in your own division. You better beat the cross divisional team because odds are you’re going to lose one to the East. (or West…as it may be).

          Like

      • PTC DAWG

        I couldn’t disagree more with your last thought.

        Like

      • Biggus Rickus

        The last line makes a lot of assumptions. You can lose and still look like the better team. It also wouldn’t be “backing in” if Georgia makes it to the Dome with a 7-1 record in the conference with the only loss being to Bama. I want Georgia to win Saturday, but more importantly, I want them to play well. If they get blown out at home, then I’ll just assume it’s the same as it ever was.

        Like

        • UGA85

          This makes sense to me. If we truly are new and improved, we should either win or be compeititive in a loss to Bama. I think either of these is likely, and I am fine with either. On the other hand, if we get blown out at home by a flawed Bama team, it bodes poorly for all the “hope and change” I feel about this team and coaching staff. I honestly can’t see a blackout type game happening to this team.

          Like

          • Mayor

            Don’t put too much on just one game. The trend for the Dawgs is upward whether they beat Bama Saturday or not. That said, I sure hope the Dawgs win. It would go a long way toward getting that reputation of not winning the big one off CMR’s back.

            Like

            • UGA85

              You know, at some point we need to prove it on the field against a tough, physical team. Reputations are made in games like this.

              Like

              • Puffdawg

                UGA85, problem is every time we win a big game, our lunatic fringe seems to immediately declare that the other team was down or injured or whatever. If we blast Alabama out of the water Saturday (or even merely beat them in a tight game), many will be on here Saturday night proclaiming we got Alabama while they were down. It’s really a no win for our team with a lot of our fans. I just think we HAVE proven it on the field against tough physical teams again and again. If anything, we haven’t proven we can do it consistently.

                We beat the dog snot out of Clemson in 2014 and they ended up 10-3 and #15. Clemson had 9 guys on that team make pro rosters. Also beat eventual division champ 34-0 at their place. They finished 11-3 and #11. Beat dog snot out of Auburn 34-7 and they wound up 8-5 #23. They were #9 at the time and chasing the West.

                In 2013, we beat #6 USCe by two scores at home. They finished #4. Also beat #6 LSU and were on our way to SECC until the bottom fell out with injuries.

                In 2012, we beat #3 Florida in Jax and went toe to toe with Alabama in Atlanta, losing on a really fluky ending.

                I agree this game would boost our reputation in the short term, but I believe winning the East, winning the SEC, and performing well or winning the playoff would boost our reputation more than a victory here. And frankly this is not a must win for that to happen.

                However, I really, REALLY want to win Saturday. I think we can certainly could win, and dare I say probably SHOULD win, but as I mentioned yesterday NOTHING would surprise me.

                Like

                • UGA85

                  I think I agree with you. We need to win a championship, not just a game. If we beat Bama, but don’t win the SEC, then one could argue we underachieved. Again. I would much rather lose one game and win the SEC.

                  Like

                • Irwin R. Fletcher

                  and frankly this is not a must win for that to happen.

                  Says who? UGA has never swept the East. Every participant in the SECCG since 2011 has gone undefeated in cross-divisional play.

                  Plus, I tend to think Bama is probably the 2nd toughest team in the West. If we can’t beat them at home, we aren’t beating them or the SECW contender in the Dome.

                  I’m not a guy that undervalues what the team has accomplished over the past few years, but I think you do yourself a disservice by watering down the magnitude of this game. If you can’t handle Bama at home, I highly doubt you are going to run the table on the rest of your games because you probably aren’t elite.

                  Like

                • UGA85

                  So, it seems that an undefeated season is your goal? I think that is a great goal, and I hope we achieve it. But, if we do lose this weekend, it hardly means that we won’t sweep the East. Have you looked at the rest of our regular season games? It also doesn’t mean that we won’t win the SEC. Beating Bama is not an “all or nothing” game for us. I don’t think that a one loss regular season somehow prevents us from winning a championship.

                  Like

                • Irwin R. Fletcher

                  Is undefeated a goal? Sure. That’s not what I’m saying though.

                  I’m saying if UGA is going to win the SEC and/or go to the SECCG they probably win this game. They will probably lose a game after the Bama game regardless…but the odds are that if they win the Bama game, they probably don’t lose more than 1 other game on the schedule…however, if they lose to Bama at home, I think that means they definitely lose another game on the schedule and fall short of the SECCG and/or the SEC Championship. It’s a barometer game of how good they are…it isn’t in a vacuum. It’s a home game against a very good team…those are the games you have to win in order to have cushion to lose a game to a good team (or even ok team) on the road.

                  Name a team in the past 5 years that has lost to a cross divisional team and gone to the Championship game? The formula is you either go undefeated OR you sweep your cross division opponents and can afford 1 loss against a familiar foe.

                  This whole meme that it isn’t as important because they are in the West is just false.

                  Like

                • Puffdawg

                  First let me say I should have qualified my statement with “this is not necessarily a must win.” I can appreciate your disdain for my watering down of the game. It is important, no question. I think I was trying to make the point that it will not necessarily make or break or season. I don’t mean it to sound like I’m hedging. We need to curb stomp their ass for 2008. For 2012. for every fucking troll who has graced this board since its birth in 2007.

                  I just hate to get too polar and paint myself into a corner. I think with the way our division is shaping up, there’s a good chance we still make Atlanta even if we lose to Bama. Excellent and valid points on us never sweeping East and last 4 years of SECC participants sweeping cross division. No idea how the hell you knew that but I’m impressed – or at least a bit concerned about your social life!!! – or maybe both!

                  And for the record if we lose Saturday, my evening will be ruined. If we win Saturday, I will celebrate for a couple of hours and then start thinking, “Holy shit, we’ve gotta go up to Knoxville next weekend and get up AGAIN! how in the hell are we going to do that?” Scorp can articulate that part better than I.

                  Like

                • Irwin R. Fletcher

                  Hear you loud and clear. I agree…I don’t think this defines a ‘successful’ season. I just think it gets really, really hard to have one without a win this Saturday. GATA and Go Dawgs!

                  Like

        • PTC DAWG

          Yep, only a blowout would leave me thinking bad about this team.

          Like

      • Puffdawg

        Saban is justifiably regarded as one of the most successful college football coaches of all time. Do you know how many undefeated seasons he has posted in 18 seasons as a head coach? One.

        But let’s get real.

        Like

        • Mayor

          And if UGA posted an undefeated season, winning the East, the SECCG and the 4 team playoff that would be a 15 game undefeated season which NOBODY has ever accomplished in the history of Div. I-A. That would be an accomplishment of major proportions. Plus, CMR and Saban would be tied in the number of undefeated seasons category.

          Like

  7. Gurkha Dawg

    Football is a team game. The only stat that matters is who wins the game. Besides giving us something to talk about during the week these stats mean very little. Baseball is an individual game played on a team. Those stats are much more meaningful.

    Sat will decide who the better team is. We shall see.

    Like

  8. Dog in Fla

    “More Schotten-stats” = a double Schott of my baby’s love

    Like

  9. Charles

    If we enjoy our offense inflicting misery and discomfort on the defenses of others, does that mean we are experiencing “Schotten-freude”?

    Like

  10. CairoDawg

    I wonder how much analyzing Richt does on weeks like this of games like the SC ’12 , Bama 08, UF ’14….games where we just didn’t seem competitive mentally. I wonder what he might be doing different this week than in those weeks.

    Like

  11. 69Dawg

    This game is a meal grinder game and will be decided on the line of scrimmage. All the pretty skill players and QB’s will just have the best seats in the house to witness the carnage. IF our offensive line is meaner, stronger and tougher than Alabama’s defensive line and our defensive line is meaner, stronger and quicker than Alabama’s offensive line, we have a chance, otherwise it will be 2008 all over again. I’ve drank my last Kool-Aid for the year.

    Like

  12. HahiraDawg

    Our “plays per game” stat is skewed after game one.

    GATA

    Like

  13. Aunt Edna

    Speaking of stats, has anyone checked out the advanced stats this site linked to last week? The projections for Alabama ain’t favorable.

    http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2015-georgia-advanced-statistical-profile

    Like

  14. dudemankind

    Sorry, but why are some content with losing to Bama just as long as it’s not a blowout? WTH? I am gonna be pissed if we lose. It likely will be close, but we SHOULD win, especially at home. This is the worse Bama team in years! It’s now or never for our guys. Beat Bama, run the SEC table, and stomp Tech’s butt at the end. No more excuses. Anyway, I sure hope our players don’t feel like a close loss is acceptable.

    Like

    • PTC DAWG

      I have other things in my life that keep me from getting pissed off about a football game. Yeah, I want to win, sure, but it won’t bother my evenng if we lose. It is not my job…CMR is the one who needs a win, not me.

      Like

      • Q

        A loss won’t bother your evening?

        Like

        • 3rdandGrantham

          Not speaking for PTC, but that’s a firm No for me. I might be bummed out for 15 min or so afterwards, but otherwise I’ll carry on while focusing on/enjoying the things in life that I actually have control or say over…such as my family, hobbies, etc.

          Why let a loss by a football team, in which you had nothing to do with the preparation, direction, or anything else relating to the team bother your evening? Not to mention that, win or lose, it doesn’t have any meaningful impact on your life whatsoever.

          Like

      • 3rdandGrantham

        I always knew you were one of my favorite posters here…

        Like

        • Rocket Dawg

          I am missing the first half at least and maybe the first 3 quarters to watch my son play football and then immediately to my daughters lacrosse game. And I am perfectly ok with that.

          Like

          • 3rdandGrantham

            I’d call that a dad with his priorities firmly in place. I’ll probably spend most of my time playing with our 3 year old both inside and outside.

            Like

          • Mayor

            Tape it and watch it later. That’s what I do.

            Like

          • I’ll be at a soccer game for most of the first half (no, I’m not communist).

            You can watch it on your phone via CBS if you are so inclined.

            BD

            Like

            • 3rdandGrantham

              I didn’t think they allowed soccer in Alabama. Although, to be fair, soccer shorts are elastic in nature, so perhaps its more popular than I imagined.

              After all, Alabama leads the nation in sales of elastic waistband pants, so you do indeed have that connection.

              Like

              • RocketDawg

                Thanks guys.

                You know 5 years ago I would get pissed off if we lost and be miserable to be around for a few days afterward but I guess with maturity comes the realization that football is a great game but in the grand scheme of things not that important.

                I have a 9 year old who is playing football/basketball/baseball like his old man and a 12 year old daughter who is a swimmer and who is trying her hand at lacrosse this season. I have a finite amount of those games to watch and I’ll be damned if I miss any of them. UGA football has been around for over 100 years and may be around for another 100 in some form (depending on what happens with the pay for play etc.). We’ll have good years and we’ll have bad years and every fall a new team will take the field. I have plenty of time for that when my kids are grown.

                Like

                • AusDawg85

                  Kids and soccer!?. Talking to the enemy? On GTP!?. Listen, you guys had better shape up or…wait…is that a pledge pin? ON YOUR UNIFORM?!!!

                  Like

            • I’ll be at the game away from my three kids. Is this the Dad guilt thread? Oh and I’ll likely be pretty bummed if we lose. Life perspective not working its magic for me this week.

              Like

    • UGA85

      Just speaking for myself, a close loss to Bama, then beating UT and running the table and winning in ATL would accomplish a lot and likely get us in the playoff. One loss is acceptable to me because we can still win the SEC.

      Like

    • dawgtired

      I will NOT feel good if we lose. I’ll pout until our game against UT.

      Like

    • Biggus Rickus

      I wouldn’t say I’d be content. I just wouldn’t be enraged.

      Like

      • What if there are a couple of crappy calls thrown in there? Maybe a lineman downfield? There is some good perspective on this thread, which will help me ziltch on game night if we lose…especially if I run across Bama fans rubbing it in. 😉 Lets just beat these guys ok?

        Like

        • Biggus Rickus

          Then I’d be enraged at the officials, but I want them all fired anyway, because they generally stink at their jobs. Or I want the SEC to pay full-time officials. One or the other.

          Like

  15. Dolly Llama

    This is completely and utterly off-topic, so y’all forgive me and read past it if you’re offended, but this is perhaps the Stingtalk-est Stingtalk thread ever:

    http://www.stingtalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85219

    Even their own people — even the rancid barrel of ass that is their commentariat — are saying “Dude, have you no sense of decency? At long last?”

    Like

    • PTC DAWG

      Sort of what I mean by taking things too seriously, kudos to the GT fans for calling that dickhead out.

      Like

    • dawgtired

      Wow, how little class some people have. I wonder how the guy would have felt about CMR’s efforts if it was his son, nephew or one of the GaTech players that was injured.

      Like

      • Dolly Llama

        I don’t know, but if we had the same amount of class as those folks, we’d take a picture of his injured son/nephew/GT player, Photoshop a “crying smiley” on it, post a thread on it and gloat. That’s what they did when both Murray and Gurley got hurt.

        Like

    • Russ

      Well, not to side with Stingtalk, but pretty much all of them shouted the guy down. I especially liked the one poster (sarcastically) saying what an asshole Richt was for using Twitter. 🙂

      On a serious note, thanks for posting it as I made my way to the gofundme site for the injured player. I hope he makes a full recovery.

      Like

      • Dolly Llama

        They were “all in” on the Murray/Gurley injury threads and the Munson/UGA death threads, though. They must be getting soft to have not jumped on this opportunity. But I guess getting your ass kicked by Duke would soften any crowd.

        Like

        • Cojones

          I easily bet on Duke in the pool. Not only were they rivals of sort for years, any pools , etc, I picked Duke straight up more times than not whenever they played the GNATS. Having their caliber coach is just icing on the cake at Duke now.

          Like

  16. UGA85

    I just have this feeling that the higher we get for this game, the harder it will be to play well next week. If Arkansas beats UT, it doesn’t matter as much, but I surely want to play well in Knoxville. Obviously, winning both games is preferable, but 1 and 1 is acceptable, IMO.

    Like

  17. Turd Ferguson

    Just in time for the Bama game, Isaiah McKenzie is accused of threatening to kill some girl, and 4 other players are listed on the police report as well.

    Too perfect.

    Like

  18. Ohio State started 2014 with Navy, VaTech, Kent State, Cincinnati, Maryland, & Rutgers. I don’t remember anyone trolling them in January.

    Like

  19. DawgByte

    A lot of people questioned the Schotty hire. Not I. Schotty is running Walsh’s old San Fran offense from the early 80’s. High percentage passing game with plenty of balance. It’s an offense designed to maintain control of the ball and keep defenses on their heels. Lambert is looking rather Montana like over the last two games.

    Like